McClatchy DC Logo

Commentary: What about rights of women in the abortion debate? | McClatchy Washington Bureau

×
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Contact Us
    • Newsletters
    • Subscriber Services

    • All White House
    • Russia
    • All Congress
    • Budget
    • All Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • DOJ
    • Criminal Justice
    • All Elections
    • Campaigns
    • Midterms
    • The Influencer Series
    • All Policy
    • National Security
    • Guantanamo
    • Environment
    • Climate
    • Energy
    • Water Rights
    • Guns
    • Poverty
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Trade
    • Civil Rights
    • Agriculture
    • Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • All Nation & World
    • National
    • Regional
    • The East
    • The West
    • The Midwest
    • The South
    • World
    • Diplomacy
    • Latin America
    • Investigations
  • Podcasts
    • All Opinion
    • Political Cartoons

  • Our Newsrooms

Opinion

Commentary: What about rights of women in the abortion debate?

Issac J. Bailey - The Myrtle Beach Sun

    ORDER REPRINT →

May 07, 2012 02:52 AM

Sometimes I get the feeling that many of those who insist that life begins at conception and call abortion of any kind murder forget that the pregnant woman has a life, too, one that needs to be honored, to be loved.

By doing that, they’ve taken a legitimate position – upholding the sanctity of life – and perverted it.

The latest example came recently in the S.C. General Assembly. On a 3-0 vote in a Senate panel, a budget clause that would eliminate a woman’s ability to get an abortion through a state health plan if she’s a victim of rape or incest was approved.

It is expected to be debated by the full Senate in May. And because the state has not elected a woman to the Senate, that debate will take place only among men.

SIGN UP

It’s just the latest in a string of related proposals that have either been pushed or approved in several states the past couple of years.

They’ve included attempts to force women to be vaginally-penetrated before they could have an abortion and declaring that life begins at conception, which would not only outlaw all abortions but even some forms of birth control.

A record 92 bills in 24 states that restrict abortion rights were passed in 2011, according the Guttmacher Institute.

And though Planned Parenthood does a lot to keep down the abortion rate – by helping women avoid unwanted pregnancies – its government funding has been targeted because a sliver of the services it provides includes abortions. (Almost 2 million unintended pregnancies are prevented every year because of government funding, according to a report by Guttmacher. It prevents more than 1 million abortions and miscarriages every year.

“The unborn child in the womb has a right to life,” Sen. Ken Bryant, R-Anderson, told the Associated Press after the Senate panel approval.

What rights does the woman have?

If Bryant’s proposal passes, a woman who is raped and can’t afford the medical procedure on her own, is forced via government orders to carry her rapist’s fetus for 9 months – and after birth decide if she wants to raise her rapist’s baby or make the painful choice of giving the child away to be raised elsewhere.

What’s worse is that it essentially would not affect South Carolina’s abortion rate, which is already fairly low because of anti-abortion statues that make it hard to legally abort a fetus that could survive on her own outside the womb.

The state’s health plan has not covered a single abortion caused by rape or incest since at least 2006. Most of those paid for during that period included removing a fetus that had already died or to save the woman’s life.

Given that, the only reason for such a law is to further push the idea that the sanctity of life claims by anti-abortion foes are exclusively about a developing fetus, and that the pregnant woman is little more than a means to an end.

Why stop there? Why pay for abortions where the life of a mother is in danger? Why even allow them under such circumstances?

Why not flood the jails with pregnant women who hint that they might want to abort?

If the only person in the equation who must be protected is the fetus, why would any of that be wrong?

As I said earlier, there is a legitimate reason to beat back abortion on demand or abortions done strictly out of convenience because those sorts of reasons, if given carte blanche, undermine the sanctity of life, something we all should guard against.

But there are two lives involved – not one.

The facts of life are these:

People will continue to have sex as surely as people will continue to eat.

Some of that sexual activity will end in pregnancies that threaten the health of the mother.

Some of it will end in pregnancies that are unwanted, for a variety of reasons.

And because of that, we have a choice to make, either try to fight against tens of thousands of years of human nature that have proven not everyone will be responsible when they become sexually active – or try to reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies, which will lead to fewer abortions and a greater respect for life.

  Comments  

Videos

“It’s not mine,” Pompeo says of New York Times op-ed

Trump and Putin shake hands at G20 Summit

View More Video

Trending Stories

Trump slams California’s ‘fast train’ as Gavin Newsom leads 16 states suing over border wall

February 19, 2019 10:46 AM

Stacey Abrams appearance at voting rights hearing has political overtones, GOP says

February 19, 2019 10:20 AM

VP Mike Pence plans visit to South Carolina to tour Opportunity Zones with Tim Scott

February 19, 2019 05:22 PM

Why Trump’s tweets could be used against him in California’s border emergency lawsuit

February 19, 2019 05:15 PM

Texas GOP searches for candidate to take on Colin Allred

February 19, 2019 05:00 AM

Read Next

Trump’s foreign policy is pushing allies into China and Russia’s waiting arms

Opinion

Trump’s foreign policy is pushing allies into China and Russia’s waiting arms

By Markos Kounalakis

    ORDER REPRINT →

February 14, 2019 06:26 PM

The United States now watches agog as, one-by-one, the global chess pieces get moved and America keeps losing its partners and its pawns.

KEEP READING

MORE OPINION

Parkland massacre riveted us in anguish, yet we still don’t act

Opinion

Parkland massacre riveted us in anguish, yet we still don’t act

February 14, 2019 05:07 PM
President Trump’s not-so-carefully considered decisions have consequences

Opinion

President Trump’s not-so-carefully considered decisions have consequences

February 12, 2019 06:00 AM
Quest for the Fountain of Youth remains a continually updated story

Opinion

Quest for the Fountain of Youth remains a continually updated story

February 07, 2019 06:04 PM
Trump is putting the U.S. on a refreshing new foreign policy path

Opinion

Trump is putting the U.S. on a refreshing new foreign policy path

February 05, 2019 09:34 AM
Small farms in the Midwest can heal the environment and prosper with ‘Green New Deal’

Opinion

Small farms in the Midwest can heal the environment and prosper with ‘Green New Deal’

February 04, 2019 04:18 PM
Brexit aside, Poland and Italy are Europe’s latest troublemakers

Opinion

Brexit aside, Poland and Italy are Europe’s latest troublemakers

January 31, 2019 06:31 PM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

Icon for mobile apps

McClatchy Washington Bureau App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Newsletters
Learn More
  • Customer Service
  • Securely Share News Tips
  • Contact Us
Advertising
  • Advertise With Us
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service


Back to Story