McClatchy DC Logo

Commentary: Fiorina's judical nomination views are unclear | McClatchy Washington Bureau

×
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Contact Us
    • Newsletters
    • Subscriber Services

    • All White House
    • Russia
    • All Congress
    • Budget
    • All Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • DOJ
    • Criminal Justice
    • All Elections
    • Campaigns
    • Midterms
    • The Influencer Series
    • All Policy
    • National Security
    • Guantanamo
    • Environment
    • Climate
    • Energy
    • Water Rights
    • Guns
    • Poverty
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Trade
    • Civil Rights
    • Agriculture
    • Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • All Nation & World
    • National
    • Regional
    • The East
    • The West
    • The Midwest
    • The South
    • World
    • Diplomacy
    • Latin America
    • Investigations
  • Podcasts
    • All Opinion
    • Political Cartoons

  • Our Newsrooms

Opinion

Commentary: Fiorina's judical nomination views are unclear

Dan Morain - The Sacramento Bee

    ORDER REPRINT →

August 12, 2010 10:46 AM

Based on Carly Fiorina's talking points, you'd think that U.S. Sen. Barbara Boxer burst the housing bubble, crashed the stock market and inflated the federal budget deficit to obscene dimensions all on her own.

At every campaign stop, Fiorina declares that the main issue in her race to unseat the incumbent Democrat is jobs, jobs and, oh yeah, jobs.

No doubt, California's economic woes will motivate many voters this fall. But the Republican challenger would be unable to do much to restore jobs if she wins on Nov. 2. She'd be a rookie in Washington, one of 100 senators in a body where seniority counts for everything.

There is, however, one area where Fiorina would have clout: Judicial appointments. On this issue, she and Boxer appear dramatically different.

SIGN UP

Unlike Boxer, Fiorina opposes abortion rights and same-sex marriage, and declares her support for Second Amendment gun rights. Federal judges have dealt with or are dealing with each issue.

Fiorina promises to have no litmus test, but also offered a rather vague standard at a campaign stop in Sacramento: "The Senate's advice and consent role is a very serious one and that is why it is incumbent on each senator to really examine the record of each individual, not make snap judgments, but make their decisions based upon what the results of that examination provide."

James Rogan, a Superior Court judge in Orange County, knows firsthand about the power that a single senator can wield over a judicial nominee.

Individual pieces of legislation are rarely remembered. But a single high court decision can have an impact across generations. Other than votes on matters of war and peace, senators take no more long-lasting actions than voting for or against a Supreme Court justice.

"It is one of the biggest parts of being a senator, and it is a part that Senate candidates talk about the least because most voters don't understand it," Rogan said. "Legislation can change from year to year, but lifetime appointments are just that."

Rogan was a Republican congressman from Burbank in 1998, when he helped manage President Bill Clinton's impeachment in the House, a move that incurred the everlasting enmity of Democratic partisans, Boxer among them.

To read the complete column, visit www.sacbee.com.

  Comments  

Videos

“It’s not mine,” Pompeo says of New York Times op-ed

Trump and Putin shake hands at G20 Summit

View More Video

Trending Stories

Justice declines to pursue allegations that CIA monitored Senate Intel staff

July 10, 2014 12:02 PM

Lindsey Graham finds himself on the margins of shutdown negotiations

January 04, 2019 04:46 PM

Trump officials exaggerate terrorist threat on southern border in tense briefing

January 04, 2019 05:29 PM

Your DNA kit begins a ‘journey of discovery’ – but are results in safe hands?

December 04, 2017 05:00 AM

‘Like losing your legs’: Duckworth pushed airlines to detail wheelchairs they break

December 21, 2018 12:00 PM

Read Next

A preview of 2019 and a few New Year’s resolutions for Trump and Pelosi

Opinion

A preview of 2019 and a few New Year’s resolutions for Trump and Pelosi

By Andrew Malcolm Special to McClatchy

    ORDER REPRINT →

January 02, 2019 06:00 AM

The president might resolve to keep his mouth shut some and silencing his cellphone more this year. Pelosi too could work on her public speaking and maybe use notes a bit more to remind of the subject at hand.

KEEP READING

MORE OPINION

The West has long militarized space. China plans to weaponize it. Not good.

Opinion

The West has long militarized space. China plans to weaponize it. Not good.

December 27, 2018 04:52 PM
Trump’s artless deal: The president’s Syria decision will have long-term consequences

Opinion

Trump’s artless deal: The president’s Syria decision will have long-term consequences

December 26, 2018 06:00 AM
This is not what Vladimir Putin wanted for Christmas

Opinion

This is not what Vladimir Putin wanted for Christmas

December 20, 2018 05:12 PM
The solution to the juvenile delinquency problem in our nation’s politics

Opinion

The solution to the juvenile delinquency problem in our nation’s politics

December 18, 2018 06:00 AM
High-flying U.S. car execs often crash when when they run into foreign laws

Opinion

High-flying U.S. car execs often crash when when they run into foreign laws

December 13, 2018 06:09 PM
Putin wants to divide the West. Can Trump thwart his plan?

Opinion

Putin wants to divide the West. Can Trump thwart his plan?

December 11, 2018 06:00 AM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

Icon for mobile apps

McClatchy Washington Bureau App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Newsletters
Learn More
  • Customer Service
  • Securely Share News Tips
  • Contact Us
Advertising
  • Advertise With Us
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service


Back to Story