McClatchy DC Logo

Bush asks Congress for billions more for Iraq | McClatchy Washington Bureau

×
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Contact Us
    • Newsletters
    • Subscriber Services

    • All White House
    • Russia
    • All Congress
    • Budget
    • All Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • DOJ
    • Criminal Justice
    • All Elections
    • Campaigns
    • Midterms
    • The Influencer Series
    • All Policy
    • National Security
    • Guantanamo
    • Environment
    • Climate
    • Energy
    • Water Rights
    • Guns
    • Poverty
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Trade
    • Civil Rights
    • Agriculture
    • Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • All Nation & World
    • National
    • Regional
    • The East
    • The West
    • The Midwest
    • The South
    • World
    • Diplomacy
    • Latin America
    • Investigations
  • Podcasts
    • All Opinion
    • Political Cartoons

  • Our Newsrooms

Congress

Bush asks Congress for billions more for Iraq

Renee Schoof - McClatchy Newspapers

    ORDER REPRINT →

September 26, 2007 07:36 PM

WASHINGTON — The Bush administration asked Congress on Wednesday for $42 billion more next year for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, an increase that would raise spending on the wars to $189 billion in 2008 — and to more than $600 billion for Iraq alone since the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq.

War spending would be higher in 2008 than any year since the Iraq war began in March 2003. The Iraq war's total cost is approaching that of the 1964-73 Vietnam War's estimated total of $518 billion, in 2007 dollars.

Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., the chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee, said the total for Iraq didn't include indirect costs such as veterans' care or the ultimate costs of long-term involvement, which the Congressional Budget Office has said could exceed $2 trillion.

"That's quite a burden this president is leaving to our grandchildren," Byrd said at a hearing at which top administration officials made their case for more money. Byrd, who's opposed the war from the beginning, wants Congress to restrict war funding as a way to wind down U.S. involvement there.

SIGN UP

"This committee will not — N-O-T — rubber-stamp every request submitted by the president," Byrd said.

However, many members of Congress, both Democrats and Republicans, fear that cutting off money for the war would be the wrong way to change course because American troops might be denied the supplies and protection they need.

There's strong support in Congress, for example, for Mine Resistant Ambush Protected Vehicles, which greatly increase the chances of soldiers surviving huge blasts from improvised explosives. More than a quarter of the $42 billion request — $11 billion — would pay for 7,000 more MRAPs.

The war so far has cost the lives of 3,801 Americans, and more than 27,000 have been wounded, while many thousands of Iraqi civilians and government security forces have been killed.

The Pentagon estimated in 2002 that the Iraq war would cost $50 billion, though the president's then-economic adviser, Lawrence Lindsey, estimated that costs could run as high as $200 billion. White House officials called Lindsey's estimate "premature," and he left the administration later that year.

Bush requested $141.7 billion in February for the Iraq and Afghan wars in fiscal year 2008, which begins Monday. In July he requested $5.3 billion more for MRAPs. The $42 billion he sought Wednesday brings the 2008 request to $189 billion. Byrd said Iraq's costs alone would exceed $600 billion if this request were approved.

In a report this month, Steven M. Kosiak of the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, a research group, said the Iraq war's cost would "almost certainly surpass the cost of the Vietnam War by the end of next year." He estimated that Vietnam cost the United States $518 billion in inflation-adjusted dollars.

Byrd asked Defense Secretary Robert Gates what President Bush meant when he said the United States might be involved in Iraq for 50 years, just as it had remained in South Korea for five decades after the end of hostilities there.

Gates said Bush was referring to a long-term agreement worked out with the Iraqis that would involve only a "small fraction" of the number of American forces there today. The length of the commitment would depend on how the Iraqi government develops and on conditions in the Middle East, Gates said.

"The purpose of that kind of longer-term presence would be to continue the fight against al Qaida, prevent foreign intervention, and train and equip Iraqi forces. It would be a very different kind of mission than our troops have today," Gates said.

Byrd allowed members of the antiwar group Code Pink to cheer while he spoke at the beginning of the hearing, but later slammed down his gavel and warned them after they shouted while Gates and other administration officials were speaking. Byrd eventually ordered security staffers to escort the protesters from the hearing room.

The $42 billion would include:

_ $6 billion for Army and Marine combat forces in Iraq.

_ $9 billion for equipment and technology.

_ $6 billion for training and equipment to improve the deployment readiness of American Army and National Guard units.

  Comments  

Videos

Some Republicans were against executive power on immigration. Now they aren’t.

Trump wants people to come into the US ‘in the largest numbers ever’ legally

View More Video

Trending Stories

Jared Kushner privately working on reshaping legal immigration

February 20, 2019 05:00 PM

Republicans rally around Trump after McCabe asserts DOJ discussed removing the president

February 20, 2019 04:53 PM

Vice President Mike Pence will go to Colombia to demand Maduro step down

February 21, 2019 10:07 AM

Fatalities from police chases climbing, could be higher than records indicate

February 21, 2019 12:00 AM

Massive public lands bill expected to receive easy approval in the House

February 20, 2019 12:54 PM

Read Next

‘Wide open race’ and open wallets in Kansas after Pompeo rules out 2020 Senate run

Congress

‘Wide open race’ and open wallets in Kansas after Pompeo rules out 2020 Senate run

By Bryan Lowry

    ORDER REPRINT →

February 21, 2019 05:00 PM

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo’s comments on The Today Show that he has ruled out a 2020 run for Senate in Kansas has emboldened candidates on both sides of aisle. The race is now wide open.

KEEP READING

MORE CONGRESS

Mitch McConnell pitches Kentucky’s Kelly Craft as Trump’s UN ambassador

Congress

Mitch McConnell pitches Kentucky’s Kelly Craft as Trump’s UN ambassador

February 21, 2019 11:50 AM
Texas think tank adds former Indiana Congressman to D.C. policy shop

Congress

Texas think tank adds former Indiana Congressman to D.C. policy shop

February 20, 2019 07:00 AM
Trump’s emergency could divert millions from military projects in Missouri, Dems say

Congress

Trump’s emergency could divert millions from military projects in Missouri, Dems say

February 20, 2019 02:13 PM
Republicans rally around Trump after McCabe asserts DOJ discussed removing the president

Congress

Republicans rally around Trump after McCabe asserts DOJ discussed removing the president

February 20, 2019 04:53 PM
Texas Republican rejects Dems’ criticism of Homestead facility for migrant kids

Congress

Texas Republican rejects Dems’ criticism of Homestead facility for migrant kids

February 20, 2019 04:37 PM
Funding for West Coast SEALs and submarines at risk under Trump border plan, Democrats say

National

Funding for West Coast SEALs and submarines at risk under Trump border plan, Democrats say

February 20, 2019 03:01 PM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

Icon for mobile apps

McClatchy Washington Bureau App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Newsletters
Learn More
  • Customer Service
  • Securely Share News Tips
  • Contact Us
Advertising
  • Advertise With Us
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service


Back to Story