Mueller declines to clear Trump in first statements on Russia Investigation
Most congressional Democrats heard one message in Robert Mueller’s public statement on Wednesday: It’s up to you to punish President Donald Trump.
But House Speaker Nancy Pelosi signaled unwillingness Wednesday to take a leap that many on the political left have already made — impeachment.
Investigating and potentially impeaching Trump dominated Capitol Hill hall talk on Wednesday, both behind closed doors where influential Democrats urge starting an inquiry and out loud among progressives demanding action.
Pelosi didn’t utter the word Wednesday in her terse five-paragraph statement issued two hours after Mueller left it to Congress to investigate Trump further.
“The Congress holds sacred its constitutional responsibility to investigate and hold the President accountable for his abuse of power,” Pelosi said. “The Congress will continue to investigate and legislate to protect our elections and secure our democracy. The American people must have the truth.”
Mueller said in his statement, “If we had had confidence that the president did not commit a crime, we would have said so.”
Notably, Mueller also said he did not have the power to indict the president.
“Under longstanding department policy, a president cannot be charged with a federal crime while he is in office,” he said. “That is unconstitutional. Even if the charge is kept under seal and hidden from public view, that too is prohibited.”
House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler of New York saw the statement as a charge to Congress to look further into allegations that, among other things, Trump may have obstructed justice.
“Given that Special Counsel Mueller was unable to pursue criminal charges against the president, it falls to Congress to respond to the crimes, lies and other wrongdoing of President Trump – and we will do so,” Nadler said.
House committees have been pursuing different allegations from the Mueller report. Judiciary has issued subpoenas to former White House aides Hope Hicks and Annie Donaldson. It also wants to hear from former White House Counsel Don McGahn, who ignored a judiciary committee subpoena to testify.
The House Ways and Means Committee has issued subpoenas for Trump’s tax returns, which he refuses to turn over. The House Oversight Committee is seeking documents from Trump’s accounting firm. Trump’s attorneys challenged the subpoena but a federal judge last week ruled against them. They plan to appeal.
How far Congress’ investigations go will depend largely on two factors: Pelosi’s directives and political reality.
Democrats control 235 of the House’s 435 seats. It would probably take 218 votes to approve an article of impeachment. Thirty-one Democrats elected in 2018 represent districts that Trump won in 2016, and Republicans see several more Democratic seats as vulnerable.
Most of the incumbents with potentially tight races have been clear that the public wants to hear about economics, health care, immigrant and other issues that impact their day to day lives — not impeachment.
Among them is Rep. Lucy McBath, a Georgia Democrat who won her seat last year with 50.5 percent in a district Trump narrowly won in 2016. She did not mention impeachment.
“We need the full (Mueller) report and its underlying evidence, and we need this Administration to stop stonewalling Congress. This blanket policy of refusing to comply with congressional oversight must end,” she said.
Rep. Debbie Mucarsel-Powell, a Florida Democrat, defeated a GOP incumbent last year. Now a Judiciary Committee member, she called for additional investigation Wednesday but did not mention impeachment.
“Congress must defend the foundation of our democracy when it is under attack from the Executive Branch,” Mucarsel-Powell said in a statement.
“We will continue to fulfill our constitutional duty of Congressional oversight. No one – not even the president – is above the law,” she said.
Rep. TJ Cox, a California Democrat who won his seat last year by less than a thousand votes, said though investigations should proceed he was not ready to call for impeachment proceedings.
“The troubling conclusions of the Mueller report are the beginning of a discussion on how to protect our democracy, not the end,” Cox said. “And it’s why it is important for Congress to continue the work of investigating, asking the tough questions, and holding the administration accountable.”
Other vulnerable Democrats had similar thoughts. Rep. Josh Harder, a California Democrat, struck nearly the exact same tone as Cox, calling for further investigation but not impeachment proceedings.
“The rule of law is extremely important – no one is above it. The Mueller report made it clear there are serious ethical violations and still many unanswered questions,” Harder said. “We have to get to the bottom of what happened and we need more transparency and accountability from Washington, especially from the White House.”
In Kansas, Rep. Sharice Davids stopped short of mentioning impeachment.
“While we still need to access the underlying documents and evidence, I continue to have full faith in my colleagues on the relevant House committees to conduct necessary oversight and uphold the rule of law,” the Democrat said. “Congress has a constitutional obligation to serve as a check on the executive branch.”
Rep. Emanuel Cleaver, a Missouri Democrat, had previously said he would make his decision on whether to support impeachment after Mueller testified before Congress. Even though Mueller said his testimony would not differ from the report, Cleaver remained convinced Wednesday that it was crucial for Mueller to testify.
“I understand his reticence to perform in the likely political circus that will come with his public testimony, but this matter is too important to our democracy and to the constituents I represent to forgo his public testimony. I’ve said it before, and I will say it now: Robert Mueller needs to testify publicly,” Cleaver said.
But pressure is growing. Last week, some House leaders tried to convince Pelosi to consider impeachment; she refused but called a special meeting of House Democrats Wednesday to discuss the road ahead. Afterwards she said Trump was engaged in a coverup.
She continued to warn that there are political risks, though, and Wednesday her tone did not change.
Her pragmatism makes sense, said former South Carolina Gov. James Hodges, a Democrat.
“She understands that something as significant as an impeachment hearing sucks all the oxygen out of the ring. If Congress could accomplish anything, it’s not going to happen under the cloud of an impeachment hearing,” said Hodges, now a Columbia, S.C., lawyer.
But, he noted, should evidence mount and impeachment demands mount, “she’s kept her options open.”