Politics & Government

GOP tries to shift California rail money to Midwest flood relief

WASHINGTON - Congressional Republicans this week are side-tracking $1.5 billion in high-speed rail funds already awarded California and other states.

In an adroit maneuver, GOP lawmakers propose shifting the high-speed rail dollars to pay for Midwestern disaster relief. The ploy would help ease the federal deficit while it underscores Republican resistance toward the Obama administration's rail plans.

"The flooding in the Midwest has been devastating," declared Rep. Rodney Frelinghuysen, R-N.J., adding that "we must be serious about controlling the deficit."

If House Republicans succeed, California would lose $368 million. The Amtrak Northeast corridor would lose $795 million, and a Midwestern high-speed rail corridor linking Chicago, Detroit and St. Louis would lose $404 million.

The high-speed rail grants were announced by the Transportation Department in May, after Florida had rejected the money. The checks, though, have not yet been sent.

"They're taking after this because it's sponsored by the president," Rep. Jim Costa, D-Fresno, complained Monday, adding that "I think it's a real slap at California."

California has planned to use its $368 million to help extend the initial high-speed rail route from Bakersfield to a rural junction near Chowchilla. The California money would also help pay for additional rail cars and locomotives.

Frelinghuysen chairs the House energy and water appropriations panel and added the funding shift as part of a fiscal 2012 energy and water bill. The bill is often a popular one in California's Central Valley, as it provides money for Sacramento-area flood control, safety upgrades at the Tule River's Success Dam and other projects.

The must-pass bill can also become a vehicle for controversial policy prescriptions, as well. The 2012 House bill, for instance, would block further spending on San Joaquin River restoration for the coming year.

This year's bill would add $1 billion for the Army Corps of Engineers to respond to floods, tornadoes and other natural disasters in the Mississippi and Missouri river basins. The post-disaster work is considered an emergency, which usually means lawmakers don't need to offset the additional spending.

Since Hurricane Katrina devastated New Orleans, for instance, Congress has provided some $5 billion on an emergency basis without demanding budget offsets.

"We have always treated those as stand-alone items," Costa noted.

Nonetheless, the Republican-controlled House Appropriations Committee wrote its energy and water bill to include taking away the high-speed rail funds. The committee on Friday rejected previous Democratic efforts to restore the funding on a party line 20-26 vote.

"It is important for the federal government to learn to live within its means," Rep. Hal Rogers, the Kentucky Republican who chairs the House Appropriations Committee, stated during the committee debate.

The funding maneuver prompted Costa, Rep. Dennis Cardoza, D-Merced, and other members of the congressional High-Speed and Intercity Passenger Rail Caucus to rally together in a blizzard of emails and phone calls Monday, though it's unclear whether they can force a House vote before the overall bill is approved later this week. Politically, it may not be advantageous to force a vote if it's likely to lose in the GOP-run House.

The House and Senate must eventually reconcile their different versions of the energy and water bill. The high-speed funding transfer is among the divisive items likely to incite intensive negotiations, as is the San Joaquin River restoration funding ban.

ON THE WEB

California High-Speed Rail Authority

MORE FROM MCCLATCHY:

California bulks up high-speed rail lobbying efforts, but is it working?

Northeast, Midwest, California get more high-speed rail funds

California's not along in seeking high-speed rail funds

  Comments