McClatchy DC Logo

Senate Dems hope to add immigration measure to defense bill | McClatchy Washington Bureau

×
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Contact Us
    • Newsletters
    • Subscriber Services

    • All White House
    • Russia
    • All Congress
    • Budget
    • All Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • DOJ
    • Criminal Justice
    • All Elections
    • Campaigns
    • Midterms
    • The Influencer Series
    • All Policy
    • National Security
    • Guantanamo
    • Environment
    • Climate
    • Energy
    • Water Rights
    • Guns
    • Poverty
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Trade
    • Civil Rights
    • Agriculture
    • Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • All Nation & World
    • National
    • Regional
    • The East
    • The West
    • The Midwest
    • The South
    • World
    • Diplomacy
    • Latin America
    • Investigations
  • Podcasts
    • All Opinion
    • Political Cartoons

  • Our Newsrooms

Politics & Government

Senate Dems hope to add immigration measure to defense bill

Michael Doyle - McClatchy Newspapers

    ORDER REPRINT →

September 17, 2010 03:49 PM

WASHINGTON — Senate Democrats want to use a defense bill to put hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants on the path toward legal U.S. residency. Or at least they want to talk about it.

In a maneuver that combines election-year posturing with legislative hardball, senior Democrats will stage an effort to add a long-stalled immigration provision to a defense bill that's scheduled for Senate debate next week.

"Kids who grew up as Americans should be able to get their green cards after they go to college or serve in the military," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said Tuesday.

States such as California, Texas and Florida have particularly big stakes in the so-called DREAM Act. So does the Pentagon. Not least, so do some senators who are running for re-election.

SIGN UP

First introduced nine years ago in a different form, the legislation covers certain illegal immigrants who are younger than 35. Immigrants who were 16 or younger when they entered the United States at least five years ago and who have completed high school or attained GED certificates could attain a six-year temporary residency.

The qualified immigrants then could become permanent U.S. residents by completing at least two years of college or serving two years in the military.

An estimated half-million California residents, 258,000 Texas residents and 192,000 Florida residents could become eligible for legal U.S. status under the bill, according to the Migration Policy Institute, a nonpartisan Washington research center that studies migration worldwide. The true number of beneficiaries would be lower, analysts say.

The Pentagon could gain additional recruiting power through the U.S. residency incentive, bill advocates say.

"The president was a supporter of the DREAM Act as a senator," White House spokesman Robert Gibbs noted Wednesday. "The administration is supportive of that legislation."

California's senators, Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer, both Democrats, are co-sponsors of the legislation, as is Florida's Democratic senator, Bill Nelson.

Still, despite the high-profile support, the bill confronts tough terrain on Capitol Hill. Motives, prospects and consequences are equally complicated.

All 39 of the DREAM Act's current co-sponsors are Democrats, giving the debate a strictly partisan hue. Some Republicans who've backed the legislation in the past, including Sens. Orrin Hatch of Utah and John McCain of Arizona, oppose it now.

Supporters will need at least 60 votes to proceed. It seems a very high hurdle, in part because some think that unrelated provisions have no business in the $726 billion defense bill.

In 2007, DREAM Act author Sen. Richard Durbin, D-Ill., likewise tried to slipstream behind a defense authorization bill. He failed. In April 2005, Feinstein had argued against using a defense spending bill to secure the passage of an agricultural guest-worker and legalization provision about which she was skeptical.

"This is not the place for this bill," Feinstein said at the time. "I believe it is a mistake to pass this bill on an emergency (defense spending bill) that is designed to provide help for our military, fighting in extraordinary circumstances."

Whatever happens to the DREAM Act itself, Democrats see an advantage in jamming Republicans by forcing them either to vote against a defense bill or swallow an unwanted immigration plan. Democrats also see gain in demonstrating their own sympathies for Hispanic voters.

Reid's re-election bid, in particular, gives him an extra reason to tout immigration legalization. Hispanics account for 25 percent of Nevada residents and are a potentially invaluable resource for Reid as he faces a challenge from Republican Sharron Angle.

Even if Congress approves the defense bill with the DREAM Act attached, White House officials say, Obama would veto the whole package because it includes funding for expensive jet engines the Pentagon doesn't want. That raises the prospect that Congress will come back and pass another bill; this one, perhaps, stripped of all but the military fundamentals.

ON THE WEB

Migration Policy Institute report on the DREAM Act

MORE FROM MCCLATCHY

DREAM Act receives renewed interest in immigration debate

Obama calls for immigration overhaul, but prospects bleak

Undocumented children pin hopes on revival of DREAM Act

Follow the latest politics news at McClatchy's Planet Washington

  Comments  

Videos

Trump says he could use executive power on border wall

A historic day for women as 116th Congress is sworn in

View More Video

Trending Stories

RIP Medical Debt donation page

November 05, 2018 05:11 PM

Here’s when the government shutdown will hurt even more

January 04, 2019 03:25 PM

Justice declines to pursue allegations that CIA monitored Senate Intel staff

July 10, 2014 12:02 PM

Lindsey Graham finds himself on the margins of shutdown negotiations

January 04, 2019 04:46 PM

Trump officials exaggerate terrorist threat on southern border in tense briefing

January 04, 2019 05:29 PM

Read Next

Racist? Immoral? The shutdown fight becomes a rhetorical war

Congress

Racist? Immoral? The shutdown fight becomes a rhetorical war

By Emma Dumain

    ORDER REPRINT →

January 07, 2019 05:21 PM

Sen. Lindsey Graham declared there would be no deal to end the government shutdown until Democrats stopped calling Republicans “racists” — the latest example of incendiary rhetoric in both parties.

KEEP READING

MORE POLITICS & GOVERNMENT

Congress

Liberals push for a Green New Deal as the way forward on climate change

January 07, 2019 08:23 AM

Congress

Here’s when the government shutdown will hurt even more

January 04, 2019 03:25 PM
Mitch McConnell, ‘Mr. Fix It,’ is not in the shutdown picture

Congress

Mitch McConnell, ‘Mr. Fix It,’ is not in the shutdown picture

January 04, 2019 05:14 PM
Lindsey Graham finds himself on the margins of shutdown negotiations

Congress

Lindsey Graham finds himself on the margins of shutdown negotiations

January 04, 2019 04:46 PM
Who will replace Roberts? Kansas senator’s retirement could spur wild 2020 race

Congress

Who will replace Roberts? Kansas senator’s retirement could spur wild 2020 race

January 04, 2019 04:12 PM
Trump officials exaggerate terrorist threat on southern border in tense briefing

Immigration

Trump officials exaggerate terrorist threat on southern border in tense briefing

January 04, 2019 05:29 PM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

Icon for mobile apps

McClatchy Washington Bureau App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Newsletters
Learn More
  • Customer Service
  • Securely Share News Tips
  • Contact Us
Advertising
  • Advertise With Us
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service


Back to Story