WASHINGTON — Passing a health care overhaul bill might be one of the hardest things Congress has ever attempted, but waiting until next year might jeopardize the top priority for President Barack Obama and the Democrats in Congress.
The political peril of waiting until 2010 — a midterm election year — could mean the death of comprehensive health care legislation, according to some analysts. "If they're going to do it, they have to do it this year," University of Virginia political analyst Larry Sabato said. "Everyone knows that. They know it."
If there isn't a bill on Obama's desk by Christmas, Obama supporters fear that lawmakers could face a repeat of the brutal August town hall meetings, where angry constituents railed against a government-run "public plan" and other elements of proposed bills. Under that scenario, lawmakers could return to Washington in January considerably less enthusiastic about health care legislation.
In addition, Tuesday's election results — Republicans won the Virginia and New Jersey governors' races with heavy support from independent voters — might make some moderate Democrats who are facing re-election next year hesitant to back a health care measure that will cost $900 billion or more over the next decade. Exit polls showed substantial numbers of voters in both states expressing concern that government "is doing too many things better left to business and individuals," according to ABC News.
As for delaying health care until next year, Sabato said, "If you're talking about having everything done except for tying it in a ribbon, that's one thing. Once everything is lined up you could have the final votes once Congress comes back ... but it has to be done." Because of the risks of waiting, he doubts that Obama and congressional Democrats would let the health care debate drag into next year.
Steve Elmendorf, once a top aide to former House of Representatives Majority Leader Richard Gephardt, agreed. Elmendorf said that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., needed to keep his troops in town and get the health bill passed.
"I think they can't ever stop," said Elmendorf, who's now a lobbyist. "If it carries over to next year, you can't leave for two weeks at Christmas and then come back. You always have to look like you're trying to push the ball down the field." Waiting until January won't make it easier with moderate Democrats who have concerns about the bill or Republicans, who've promised a lengthy floor fight, he said.
Others don't think the situation is so dire. They say that Democrats could deliver a bill to Obama by the State of the Union speech early next year or even in the spring. Between Christmas and the new year, they say, people are focused on their families rather than politics and would be unlikely to participate in town hall meetings aimed at health care or any other legislative issue.
House Democrats are expected to begin debate on their health care overhaul measure Friday and may vote as soon as Saturday. In the Senate, Reid is awaiting a Congressional Budget Office analysis of a measure that the chamber could begin considering later this month.
Obama took office vowing to make a health care overhaul his premier domestic-policy goal, and for much of the year it appeared that the legislation had great momentum. Then a series of angry town hall meetings in August set back the legislation and raised questions about whether Congress could pass a bill this year. Once the Senate Finance Committee finally passed a measure last month with one Republican vote, it appeared that the bill was back on track.
However, with some moderate Democrats hanging back, Reid has been unable to put together a 60-vote majority to take up and pass the bill. Reid and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., have struggled to win support from moderates, who've expressed concern about the cost of the bill and the expansion of government. Other House Democrats have threatened to block the measure over contentious abortion and immigration issues.
Reid shocked the Senate on Tuesday when he said that the chamber might not act on health care legislation this year. "We're not going to be bound by any timelines," he said. "We need to do the best job for the American people."
Reid spokesman Jim Manley later clarified the senator's remarks. "Our goals remain unchanged," he said. "We want to get health insurance reform done this year, and we have unprecedented momentum to achieve that. There is no reason why we can't have a transparent and thorough debate in the Senate and still send a bill to the president by Christmas."
Even if House Democrats move their measure quickly, debate in the Senate could take considerably longer.
"I think this is as big and complicated an issue as Congress has faced in a long, long time. I think it's very difficult to truncate the time," said Sen. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D. "... I think it's going to take a while in the Senate."
Noting the size and complexity of the health care bill, as well as its historic significance, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., has signaled that Republicans intend to have a long debate over the measure.
"We don't think we ought to be passing a 2,000-page, trillion-dollar bill. I think we ought to be going step by step to fix the problems the American people see in our health care system," he said.
MORE FROM KAISER HEALTH NEWS
Coverage of the health care debate
ON THE WEB
Side-by-side comparison of health care bills
Kaiser Family Foundation survey of employer health benefits
MORE FROM MCCLATCHY
Health care: Some agreement, then there's the public option
Pelosi unveils House version of health care bill
Blue Dogs aren't there yet on new House health bill
Follow the latest politics news at McClatchy's Planet Washington
Comments