McClatchy DC Logo

Petraeus renews limits on airstrikes in Afghanistan | McClatchy Washington Bureau

×
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Contact Us
    • Newsletters
    • Subscriber Services

    • All White House
    • Russia
    • All Congress
    • Budget
    • All Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • DOJ
    • Criminal Justice
    • All Elections
    • Campaigns
    • Midterms
    • The Influencer Series
    • All Policy
    • National Security
    • Guantanamo
    • Environment
    • Climate
    • Energy
    • Water Rights
    • Guns
    • Poverty
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Trade
    • Civil Rights
    • Agriculture
    • Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • All Nation & World
    • National
    • Regional
    • The East
    • The West
    • The Midwest
    • The South
    • World
    • Diplomacy
    • Latin America
    • Investigations
  • Podcasts
    • All Opinion
    • Political Cartoons

  • Our Newsrooms

World

Petraeus renews limits on airstrikes in Afghanistan

Nancy A. Youssef - McClatchy Newspapers

    ORDER REPRINT →

August 04, 2010 06:45 PM

WASHINGTON — Afghanistan commander Army Gen. David Petraeus has renewed orders to American troops to refrain from calling in artillery or air power when battling Taliban forces unless they're certain that no civilians are present.

The Aug. 1 order, Petraeus' first since he assumed command early this summer from ousted Army Gen. Stanley McChrystal, was an effort to fine-tune a McChrystal directive that had angered some U.S. troops, who said the restrictions on the use of artillery and air power exposed them to greater danger. Petraeus' order, unclassified portions of which were released Wednesday, seemed unlikely to mollify that complaint, however.

In his directive, Petraeus sought to strike a balance between protecting the population — the cornerstone of counterinsurgency — and minimizing the risks to U.S. and allied troops.

He wrote that protecting civilians "does not prevent commanders from protecting the lives of their men and women as a matter of self-defense where it is determined no other options are available to effectively counter the threat."

SIGN UP

Petraeus, however, used virtually the same language as McChrystal to prohibit the use of artillery and airstrikes unless a commander knows civilians won't be wounded or killed.

Before using firepower, "the commander approving the strike must determine that no civilians are present," Petraeus wrote. "If unable to assess the risk of civilian presence, fires are prohibited" except in two cases that weren't released because of operational security.

"We must pursue the Taliban tenaciously," he added. "But we must fight with great discipline and tactical patience."

Petraeus did make two changes to the rules:

  • He ordered U.S. troops to have Afghan security forces with them at all times to make sure civilians aren't at risk. "Some civilian casualties result from a misunderstanding or ignorance of local customs and behaviors. No individuals are more attuned to the Afghan culture than our Afghan partners," he wrote to his troops.
  • He also called for better training for U.S. troops to know how to apply the rule in ways that don't put them at risk.
  • Many U.S. troops in Afghanistan had hoped that Petraeus would give them more room to use air power, the one area in which the U.S. military dominates the Taliban. Petraeus, however, indicated little change from McChrystal's stance on the issue.

    Like McChrystal, Petraeus made the directive his first major order of his tenure. Many portions of the order used virtually the same language as McChrystal's July 1, 2009, directive, which some soldiers said they resented because it put them at risk to avoid any chance of civilian casualties.

    In the wake of McChrystal's order, some airmen refused to drop ordnance and sought alternatives, such as dropping flares, flying aircraft so that the insurgents could see them and dropping bombs harmlessly in the mountains in hopes that the sound of the blasts would scare off fighters.

    Civilian casualties caused by U.S. and NATO troops dropped significantly after McChrystal's order, but American troop deaths rose as the U.S. military sent 30,000 more troops into Afghanistan. July, with 66 American deaths, was the deadliest month for U.S. troops of the nine-year war.

    Troops are also unlikely to embrace the admonition that Afghan security forces must accompany them on every mission. Currently about 85 percent of combat missions are joint operations, the Pentagon said.

    U.S. soldiers, however, disparage the Afghan forces as poorly motivated, equipped and trained.

    There are 98,000 U.S. troops in Afghanistan.

    MORE FROM MCCLATCHY

    McChrystal recall culminates months of tensions with White House

    Obama ousts Gen. McChrystal, nominates Petraeus

    Troops told to stop Taliban pursuit if civilians are at risk

    Follow McClatchy on Twitter.

    Related stories from McClatchy DC

    world

    Ex-Guantanamo detainee now campaigning in Afghanistan

    August 04, 2010 04:36 PM

    world

    U.S. PR offensive highlights insurgent attacks on Afghan civilians

    August 04, 2010 05:24 PM

      Comments  

    Videos

    Argentine farmers see promising future in soybean crops

    Erdogan: Investigators will continue search after Khashoggi disappearance

    View More Video

    Trending Stories

    Cell signal puts Cohen outside Prague around time of purported Russian meeting

    December 27, 2018 10:36 AM

    Ted Cruz’s anti-Obamacare crusade continues with few allies

    December 24, 2018 10:33 AM

    Sources: Mueller has evidence Cohen was in Prague in 2016, confirming part of dossier

    April 13, 2018 06:08 PM

    California Republicans fear even bigger trouble ahead for their wounded party

    December 27, 2018 09:37 AM

    Hundreds of sex abuse allegations found in fundamental Baptist churches across U.S.

    December 09, 2018 06:30 AM

    Read Next

    Why some on the right are grateful to Democrats for opposing Trump’s border wall

    Immigration

    Why some on the right are grateful to Democrats for opposing Trump’s border wall

    By Franco Ordoñez

      ORDER REPRINT →

    December 20, 2018 05:12 PM

    Conservative groups supporting Donald Trump’s calls for stronger immigration policies are now backing Democratic efforts to fight against Trump’s border wall.

    KEEP READING

    MORE WORLD

    World

    State Department allows Yemeni mother to travel to U.S. to see her dying son, lawyer says

    December 18, 2018 10:24 AM
    Ambassador who served under 8 U.S. presidents dies in SLO at age 92

    Politics & Government

    Ambassador who served under 8 U.S. presidents dies in SLO at age 92

    December 17, 2018 09:26 PM
    ‘Possible quagmire’ awaits new trade deal in Congress; Big Business is nearing panic

    Trade

    ‘Possible quagmire’ awaits new trade deal in Congress; Big Business is nearing panic

    December 17, 2018 10:24 AM
    How Congress will tackle Latin America policy with fewer Cuban Americans in office

    Congress

    How Congress will tackle Latin America policy with fewer Cuban Americans in office

    December 14, 2018 06:00 AM

    Diplomacy

    Peña Nieto leaves office as 1st Mexican leader in decades not to get a U.S. state visit

    December 07, 2018 09:06 AM
    Argentina “BFF” status questioned as Trump fawns over “like-minded” Brazil leader

    Latin America

    Argentina “BFF” status questioned as Trump fawns over “like-minded” Brazil leader

    December 03, 2018 12:00 AM
    Take Us With You

    Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

    Icon for mobile apps

    McClatchy Washington Bureau App

    View Newsletters

    Subscriptions
    • Newsletters
    Learn More
    • Customer Service
    • Securely Share News Tips
    • Contact Us
    Advertising
    • Advertise With Us
    Copyright
    Privacy Policy
    Terms of Service


    Back to Story