McClatchy DC Logo

Senators slam Air Force over $35 billion tanker contract | McClatchy Washington Bureau

×
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Contact Us
    • Newsletters
    • Subscriber Services

    • All White House
    • Russia
    • All Congress
    • Budget
    • All Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • DOJ
    • Criminal Justice
    • All Elections
    • Campaigns
    • Midterms
    • The Influencer Series
    • All Policy
    • National Security
    • Guantanamo
    • Environment
    • Climate
    • Energy
    • Water Rights
    • Guns
    • Poverty
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Trade
    • Civil Rights
    • Agriculture
    • Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • All Nation & World
    • National
    • Regional
    • The East
    • The West
    • The Midwest
    • The South
    • World
    • Diplomacy
    • Latin America
    • Investigations
  • Podcasts
    • All Opinion
    • Political Cartoons

  • Our Newsrooms

Economy

Senators slam Air Force over $35 billion tanker contract

Rob Hotakainen - McClatchy Newspapers

    ORDER REPRINT →

January 27, 2011 04:56 PM

WASHINGTON — Senators from both parties lambasted the U.S. Air Force Thursday after military officials acknowledged that they'd accidentally disclosed secret data to competing bidders as part of their effort to award a $35 billion contract to build a new fleet of aerial refueling tankers.

At a hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee, Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., called the incident "a debacle" and asked what punitive action had been taken. She said those involved in the error should be fired.

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., called it "a fiasco" and part of an ongoing "saga of mismanagement."

"Thank goodness it wasn't classified," said Sen. Scott Brown, R-Mass., who also expressed wonder that it has taken the Air Force more than a decade to award the contract. "It's only the federal government that would take 10 years to do a contract. ... It just makes no sense to me."

SIGN UP

"This is not the finest moment for the Air Force, and I am part of it," said Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., a colonel in the Air Force Reserve.

The hearing came only weeks before the Air Force is expected to award the contract to either Chicago-based Boeing or the European Aeronautic Defence and Space Company, commonly known as EADS, the parent of the aircraft maker Airbus.

In November, Air Force officials shared analyses of each side's bid with the other company. Military officials investigated the disclosure and decided that the bidding process could proceed.

"I would come to the conclusion that it wasn't damaged," Maj. Gen. Wendy Masiello told the committee.

In her prepared remarks, she said: "While the department regrets that the incident occurred, department leadership is satisfied that both companies responded to the incident correctly and professionally."

That satisfied two Republicans on the panel — both from states whose congressional delegations have offered strong backing to EADS, which has said it would build its tankers in Mobile, Ala.

Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., defended the Air Force, saying its reputation shouldn't suffer because of a human error.

"They did everything they could do," he said.

Sessions suggested that backers of the Boeing bid were out to "destabilize the process," adding: "I am not happy about it."

Sen. Roger Wicker, R-Miss., said the Air Force had responded correctly and professionally, noting that both companies were "relatively relaxed" and that neither had filed a formal complaint about the process.

Masiello called the data sharing "an inadvertent disclosure of information" and said that the two employees involved in the incident had been reassigned.

"I would like to know where they are," McCaskill told Masiello, saying she feared they would "resurface" elsewhere. She said the incident was "beyond the pale" and that the Air Force had failed at "a core competency."

Sen. Maria Cantwell, a Democrat of Washington, where officials have backed the Boeing bid because they expect it to mean thousands of new jobs there, requested the hearing to air the disclosure and assess whether it had given either company an unfair advantage.

On Wednesday, Cantwell and Republican Sen. Jerry Moran of Kansas introduced a bill that would require the Pentagon to consider any unfair advantages for either company gained through subsidies before awarding the contract.

Boeing backers allege that EADS has an advantage because it receives government subsidies. Boeing has large manufacturing facilities in Washington state, Kansas, Missouri and another plant slated to open this year in South Carolina.

"American workers, warfighters, and taxpayers deserve a level playing field in the tanker competition," Cantwell said.

Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., who cosponsored the bill, said that illegal foreign subsidies "are distorting this competition and stacking the deck against American workers."

A decision on which company will get the contract is expected in February or March.

After the hearing, Cantwell said she'd ask the Defense Department inspector general to investigate the incident.

"Today's hearing did not get at the core of the problem," she said. "The tanker competition is a price competition, and EADS saw Boeing's proprietary data. ... EADS now has an unfair competitive advantage to adjust its bid to undercut Boeing."

MORE FROM MCCLATCHY

Europe's Airbus to bid without U.S. partner for Air Force tanker

More controversy looms as Air Force re-bids tanker contract

WikiLeaks: U.S. officials pushed Brazil to buy Boeing fighters

Follow McClatchy on Twitter.

  Comments  

Videos

Lone Sen. Pat Roberts holds down the fort during government shutdown

President Trump makes surprise visit to troops in Iraq

View More Video

Trending Stories

Cell signal puts Cohen outside Prague around time of purported Russian meeting

December 27, 2018 10:36 AM

Ted Cruz’s anti-Obamacare crusade continues with few allies

December 24, 2018 10:33 AM

With no agreement on wall, partial federal shutdown likely to continue until 2019

December 21, 2018 03:02 PM

Lone senator at the Capitol during shutdown: Kansas Sen. Pat Roberts

December 27, 2018 06:06 PM

‘Possible quagmire’ awaits new trade deal in Congress; Big Business is nearing panic

December 17, 2018 10:24 AM

Read Next

Are Muslim-owned accounts being singled out by big banks ?
Video media Created with Sketch.

Policy

Are Muslim-owned accounts being singled out by big banks ?

By Kevin G. Hall and

Rob Wile

    ORDER REPRINT →

December 17, 2018 07:00 AM

Despite outcry several years ago, U.S. banks are back in the spotlight as more Muslim customers say they’ve had accounts frozen and/or closed with no explanation given. Is it discrimination or bank prudence?

KEEP READING

MORE ECONOMY

The lights are back on, but after $3.2B will Puerto Rico’s grid survive another storm?

National

The lights are back on, but after $3.2B will Puerto Rico’s grid survive another storm?

September 20, 2018 07:00 AM
Title-pawn shops ‘keep poor people poor.’ Who’s protecting Georgians from debt traps?

Investigations

Title-pawn shops ‘keep poor people poor.’ Who’s protecting Georgians from debt traps?

September 20, 2018 12:05 PM

Agriculture

Citrus disease could kill California industry if Congress slows research, growers warn

September 11, 2018 03:01 AM

Politics & Government

The GOP’s new attack: Democrats wants to ‘end’ Medicare

September 07, 2018 05:00 AM
KS congressman: Farmers are ‘such great patriots’ they’ll ride out Trump trade woes

Economy

KS congressman: Farmers are ‘such great patriots’ they’ll ride out Trump trade woes

August 30, 2018 02:17 PM
Democrats’ fall strategy: Stop talking Trump

Midterms

Democrats’ fall strategy: Stop talking Trump

August 24, 2018 05:00 AM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

Icon for mobile apps

McClatchy Washington Bureau App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Newsletters
Learn More
  • Customer Service
  • Securely Share News Tips
  • Contact Us
Advertising
  • Advertise With Us
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service


Back to Story