McClatchy DC Logo

U.S. opposes Pakistani plans for talks with militants | McClatchy Washington Bureau

×
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Contact Us
    • Newsletters
    • Subscriber Services

    • All White House
    • Russia
    • All Congress
    • Budget
    • All Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • DOJ
    • Criminal Justice
    • All Elections
    • Campaigns
    • Midterms
    • The Influencer Series
    • All Policy
    • National Security
    • Guantanamo
    • Environment
    • Climate
    • Energy
    • Water Rights
    • Guns
    • Poverty
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Trade
    • Civil Rights
    • Agriculture
    • Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • All Nation & World
    • National
    • Regional
    • The East
    • The West
    • The Midwest
    • The South
    • World
    • Diplomacy
    • Latin America
    • Investigations
  • Podcasts
    • All Opinion
    • Political Cartoons

  • Our Newsrooms

Latest News

U.S. opposes Pakistani plans for talks with militants

Warren P. Strobel and Jonathan S. Landay - McClatchy Newspapers

    ORDER REPRINT →

February 28, 2008 06:37 PM

WASHINGTON — Senior Bush administration officials Thursday said they oppose plans by some Pakistani politicians to open talks with Islamic militants, saying that could lead to a repeat of a failed 2006 peace accord.

That accord "didn't really work," Deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte told a Senate committee. U.S. officials say the agreement gave al Qaida and other militant groups breathing space to regroup.

Assistant Secretary of State Richard Boucher, the State Department's point man on South Asia, was blunter.

"We've always found that a negotiation that's not backed by a certain amount of force can't really force out the bad guys," Boucher said in an interview on National Public Radio, referring to militants in the Pakistan-Afghanistan border region.

SIGN UP

"Ultimately, it's the outcome that matters," he said.

The two parties that triumphed in the Feb. 18 elections for the national parliament, however, have stressed the need for a political — rather than a military — solution to the insurgency.

Also, McClatchy reported on Tuesday that the smaller secular party that won the elections in Pakistan's Northwest Frontier Province plans to open talks with local Islamic insurgents allied with al Qaida.

Negroponte and Boucher, though, both expressed optimism that Pakistan's new federal and provincial governments, which are still to be formed after the Feb. 18 elections, will continue to cooperate with the U.S. against Islamic extremists.

Their comments underscore the dilemma that the administration is facing since his party's poor showing in the elections undermined President Bush's long-time ally in Pakistan, President Pervez Musharraf.

In Pakistan Thursday, a pre-dawn missile strike killed at least 12 suspected foreign Islamic militants in a village near the border with Afghanistan, according to residents contacted by phone.

The militants were staying at a guesthouse belonging to a member of an Islamic political party with links to the Afghan and Pakistani Taliban, residents said.

It's not clear who fired the missile, but it's widely believed that U.S. forces in Afghanistan or a pilotless U.S. drone staged the attack in Azam Warzak in the South Waziristan tribal agency, which has been a refuge for al Qaida fighters and Afghan and Pakistani militants.

A U.S. missile strike in the same area last month killed a senior al Qaida commander, Abu Laith al-Libi.

Robert Grenier, a former CIA station chief in Pakistan, said that Pakistan's new political leaders are likely to be torn about how to confront terrorism.

After the December murder of former prime minister Benazir Bhutto, they realize that you cannot conclude a "separate peace" with radicals, Grenier told a forum sponsored by the Council on Foreign Relations.

On the other hand, he said, a temptation remains "to try to make that separate peace," he said. "The problem is, it's unsustainable."

At Thursday's Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing, Negroponte appeared to back away slightly from the strong endorsement the White House gave Musharraf after his party lost at the polls.

"We intend to pursue (both countries') common interest vigorously with whatever government emerges from the election," he said.

However, Negroponte refused to give a U.S. position on whether judges Musharraf fired in November should be reinstated. If reinstated, the judges could void Musharraf's October re-election as president.

"We have . . . been silent on the subject," Negroponte said.

Senators peppered him with demands that the White House increase non-military aid, particularly for Pakistan's ungoverned tribal areas, and send a signal of support for moderate political leaders in the election's aftermath.

Sen. Joseph Biden, D-Del., has proposed tripling non-military aid to Pakistan to roughly $1.5 billion annually.

"It seems to me that this is a crucial turning point," said Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Ind. He urged Negroponte to "at least spell out what type of money we're thinking about."(Landay reported from Peshawar, Pakistan.)

ON THE WEB

Related McClatchy stories:

Pakistan winners seek talks with Islamic militants

Exclusive: U.S. urges Pakistanis to keep Musharraf, despite election defeat

  Comments  

Videos

Suspects steal delivered televisions out front of house

Stabenow: No security for farmers if government shuts down

View More Video

Trending Stories

Cell signal puts Cohen outside Prague around time of purported Russian meeting

December 27, 2018 10:36 AM

Sources: Mueller has evidence Cohen was in Prague in 2016, confirming part of dossier

April 13, 2018 06:08 PM

Hundreds of sex abuse allegations found in fundamental Baptist churches across U.S.

December 09, 2018 06:30 AM

California Republicans fear even bigger trouble ahead for their wounded party

December 27, 2018 09:37 AM

This is not what Vladimir Putin wanted for Christmas

December 20, 2018 05:12 PM

Read Next

Does Pat Roberts’ farm bill dealmaking make him an ‘endangered species?’

Congress

Does Pat Roberts’ farm bill dealmaking make him an ‘endangered species?’

By Bryan Lowry and

Lindsay Wise

    ORDER REPRINT →

December 26, 2018 08:02 AM

After getting the farm bill passed with historically large majorities, Pat Roberts is spending the holiday break weighing another run for Senate after nearly four decades in Congress. Is his bipartisan dealmaking an asset or a red flag with Republican voters?

KEEP READING

MORE LATEST NEWS

‘Remember the Alamo’: Meadows steels conservatives, Trump for border wall fight

Congress

‘Remember the Alamo’: Meadows steels conservatives, Trump for border wall fight

December 22, 2018 12:34 PM
With no budget fix in sight, partial federal shutdown drags on

Congress

With no budget fix in sight, partial federal shutdown drags on

December 21, 2018 03:02 PM
‘Like losing your legs’: Duckworth pushed airlines to detail  wheelchairs they break

Congress

‘Like losing your legs’: Duckworth pushed airlines to detail wheelchairs they break

December 21, 2018 12:00 PM
Trump’s prison plan to release thousands of inmates

Congress

Trump’s prison plan to release thousands of inmates

December 21, 2018 12:18 PM
Why some on the right are grateful to Democrats for opposing Trump’s border wall

Immigration

Why some on the right are grateful to Democrats for opposing Trump’s border wall

December 20, 2018 05:12 PM
Graham, Trump go to war over Syrian troop withdrawal

Congress

Graham, Trump go to war over Syrian troop withdrawal

December 20, 2018 02:59 PM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

Icon for mobile apps

McClatchy Washington Bureau App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Newsletters
Learn More
  • Customer Service
  • Securely Share News Tips
  • Contact Us
Advertising
  • Advertise With Us
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service


Back to Story