McClatchy DC Logo

Gates' donations causes ripple effect in global health | McClatchy Washington Bureau

×
    • Customer Service
    • Mobile & Apps
    • Contact Us
    • Newsletters
    • Subscriber Services

    • All White House
    • Russia
    • All Congress
    • Budget
    • All Justice
    • Supreme Court
    • DOJ
    • Criminal Justice
    • All Elections
    • Campaigns
    • Midterms
    • The Influencer Series
    • All Policy
    • National Security
    • Guantanamo
    • Environment
    • Climate
    • Energy
    • Water Rights
    • Guns
    • Poverty
    • Health Care
    • Immigration
    • Trade
    • Civil Rights
    • Agriculture
    • Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • All Nation & World
    • National
    • Regional
    • The East
    • The West
    • The Midwest
    • The South
    • World
    • Diplomacy
    • Latin America
    • Investigations
  • Podcasts
    • All Opinion
    • Political Cartoons

  • Our Newsrooms

Latest News

Gates' donations causes ripple effect in global health

Frank Greve - Knight Ridder Newspapers

    ORDER REPRINT →

May 19, 2005 03:00 AM

WASHINGTON—John D. Rockefeller was a piker compared with Bill Gates.

The Microsoft magnate, who's 49, has spent nearly as much in the past five years just to improve global health—$5.4 billion—as Rockefeller gave to all causes in his 97-year lifetime.

That largess has made Gates the world leader in the main area that his foundation funds: vaccines and childhood immunizations for the developing world. The United Nations World Health Organization credits the Seattle-based Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation—the world's richest, with an endowment of $28.8 billion—with helping to save 670,000 lives.

Using his "superpower access without superpower baggage," as James Sherry of the advocacy group Global Health Council put it, Gates is convincing rich and poor countries, international health organizations and drug makers to do more to prevent Third World diseases. Typically, they're organized into new Gates-funded global coalitions with single goals: a malaria vaccine, for example, or a spermicide for women that also can ward off AIDS.

SIGN UP

Donors from the singer Bono to the Bush administration have followed Gates' lead, multiplying the effects of his donations. It helps that many see the Gates Foundation's giving as not just massive but also shrewd.

Last week's Gates donation of $250 million, for example, announced at the World Health Assembly in Geneva, backs research on tough technical problems that, if solved, would greatly improve global health. One challenge is to devise vaccines that don't require refrigeration. Another is to create vaccines that can be administered without needles. A third pays for genetic research to incapacitate disease-carrying insects.

Gates is also the world's leading supporter of research into vaccines for malaria and tuberculosis and the biggest nongovernment funder of AIDS-vaccine research. This trio causes more than 6 million deaths a year worldwide, according to the WHO. Another 2.1 million people—two-thirds of them younger than 5—die of infectious diseases that already available vaccines could avert.

For various reasons, mainly the indifference or distraction of U.S. and international global-health agencies, Third World preventive medicine "stagnated and regressed" in the 1990s after big improvements in inoculation rates in the 1980s, according to Dean Jamison of the National Institutes of Health's Disease Control Priorities Project and other experts.

The Gates-led revival has a legion of grant recipients saying nicer things about Microsoft's founder than many users of his software.

"The Gates Foundation introduced a lot of optimism into the field of global health at a time when there was real and growing despair," said Ruth Levine of the Center for Global Development, a Washington-based group that fights rich-poor inequalities. "We got an explosion of interest and money and work from the Gates Foundation, but the optimism was probably the most important thing. It's the original can-do foundation."

Take the case of researcher Scott Halstead, who's spent 40-some years seeking a dengue-fever vaccine. Dengue, an infectious mosquito-borne tropical disease of the joints that kills about 3,000 South American and Asian children a year, also afflicts developing-world economies because outbreaks sideline workers, deter trade and discourage tourism.

The U.S. military sustained dengue research for years, but it's been flat since the early ྖs, according to Halstead. Drug companies have done modest, uncoordinated research. U.S. and international agencies showed more interest in African diseases, especially AIDS.

Then, last year, $55 million from the Gates Foundation doubled the worldwide dengue-research budget to $10 million a year. Halstead's research teams, which suddenly controlled the lion's share of the money, were positioned to run a coordinated global campaign against dengue.

"This is like a new dawn," Halstead said. "The money allows us to organize and focus a serious program. Every day we're talking to lab researchers capable of doing something important who wouldn't have been talking with us a year ago."

Other donors—the WHO, the European Union and the Swiss drug company Novartis—followed Gates with new commitments to fight dengue.

The Rockefeller Foundation, whose roughly $20 million a year in grants had made it the dominant private global-health donor until Gates came along, played a bit part. Its small grant helped Halstead design his Gates Foundation proposal.

Gates, his wife, Melinda, and his father, Bill Sr., are hands-on managers of the foundation, which was created after Gates' mother, Mary, died in 1994. The fourth principal is foundation President Patty Stonesifer, a former Microsoft executive and close family friend. Since 1999, they've focused mainly on global health and on education, where the Gates foundation is one of many players.

All three Gates family members have spoken out against disparities in preventive health between rich and poor countries. Gates himself, who wasn't available to be interviewed for this story, has said he got into the issue by reading a 1993 World Bank report titled "Investing in Health."

"Every page screamed out that human life was not being treated as nearly as valuable in the world at large as it should be," Gates told a Seattle AIDS conference in 2003.

The basic problem is that vaccines, which typically offer long-term immunity from one battery of shots, aren't nearly as profitable as drugs that are taken daily. Pfizer's cholesterol-lowering Lipitor, for example, with $10 billion in global sales, grosses more than all the world's vaccines combined.

To compensate, the Gates Foundation picks up research costs and helps with clinical trials in return for cut-rate sales to poor countries. It pools potential buyers to create and guarantee drug-makers the largest possible vaccine markets. It's assembled an international public-private consortium, the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization, to bring cheaper, better preventive health to the world's 75 poorest countries.

The alliance's money comes from The Vaccine Fund, mainly $1.5 billion in Gates Foundation grants and pledges. Norway and the United States, the next biggest donors, chip in about $660 million. By comparison, WHO's entire annual budget is about $800 million.

For all its generosity, the Gates Foundation draws some complaints these days. Once famously fast and informal at awarding grants, its system now takes 18 months from proposal to check. Its once-lean staff of about 20 has grown to about 200. The four top decision-makers may be walled off from the open debate about grants and direction that a larger board might provide.

There's also a challenge to Gates' overall strategy of stoking research and development rather than trying to improve conditions in Third World countries, a strategy that's also proved to deliver big gains in health.

Anne-Emanuelle Birn, a Canadian public-health scientist, made that argument in the British medical journal The Lancet in March. She said Gates' bets on technology "share an assumption that scientific and technical aspects of health improvement can be separated from political, social and economic aspects."

She favors "support for universal, accessible and comprehensive public-health systems (to ensure vaccine coverage, among many activities) in the context of overall improvements in living and working conditions."

Gates, in announcing his $250 million grant in Geneva last week, addressed her argument.

"The world didn't have to eliminate poverty in order to eliminate smallpox," he said, "and we don't have to reduce poverty before we reduce malaria."

———

To read Bill Gates' May 16 speech on global health, go to www.gatesfoundation.org, where it's the lead story, and click on "View speech." For more information, click on "Global Health" on the Gates home page.

For a primer on vaccine economics, go to the Center for Global Development site, www.cgdev.org, and click on "Making Markets for Vaccines."

For more on Gates' global vaccine consortium go to www.vaccinealliance.org.

———

(c) 2005, Knight Ridder/Tribune Information Services.

ARCHIVE PHOTOS on KRT Direct (from KRT Photo Service, 202-383-6099): Bill Gates

GRAPHIC (from KRT Graphics, 202-383-6064): 20050519 GATES diseases

Need to map

Related stories from McClatchy DC

latest-news

1017870

May 24, 2007 04:20 AM

  Comments  

Videos

Lone Sen. Pat Roberts holds down the fort during government shutdown

Suspects steal delivered televisions out front of house

View More Video

Trending Stories

Justice declines to pursue allegations that CIA monitored Senate Intel staff

July 10, 2014 12:02 PM

RIP Medical Debt donation page

November 05, 2018 05:11 PM

Trump’s prison plan to release thousands of inmates

December 21, 2018 12:18 PM

Trump administration wants huge limits on food stamps — even though Congress said ‘no’

December 20, 2018 05:00 AM

Jerry Moran to push for speedy final vote on ending U.S. role in Yemen

December 11, 2018 01:21 PM

Read Next

Lindsey Graham finds himself on the margins of shutdown negotiations

Congress

Lindsey Graham finds himself on the margins of shutdown negotiations

By Emma Dumain

    ORDER REPRINT →

January 04, 2019 04:46 PM

Sen. Lindsey Graham is used to be in the middle of the action on major legislative debates, but he’s largely on the sidelines as he tries to broker a compromise to end the government shutdown.

KEEP READING

MORE LATEST NEWS

Kansas Republican Pat Roberts announces retirement, sets up open seat race for Senate

Congress

Kansas Republican Pat Roberts announces retirement, sets up open seat race for Senate

January 04, 2019 11:09 AM
Mitch McConnell, ‘Mr. Fix It,’ is not in the shutdown picture

Congress

Mitch McConnell, ‘Mr. Fix It,’ is not in the shutdown picture

January 04, 2019 05:14 PM
Delayed tax refunds. Missed federal paychecks. The shutdown’s pain keeps growing.

Congress

Delayed tax refunds. Missed federal paychecks. The shutdown’s pain keeps growing.

January 03, 2019 04:31 PM
Sharice Davids shows ‘respect’ for Pelosi’s authority on Congress’ first day

Congress

Sharice Davids shows ‘respect’ for Pelosi’s authority on Congress’ first day

January 03, 2019 03:22 PM
As Cornyn exits Senate leadership, Texas is shut out of its own border talks

Congress

As Cornyn exits Senate leadership, Texas is shut out of its own border talks

January 03, 2019 05:21 PM
Joe Cunningham votes no on Pelosi as speaker, backs House campaign head instead

Congress

Joe Cunningham votes no on Pelosi as speaker, backs House campaign head instead

January 03, 2019 12:25 PM
Take Us With You

Real-time updates and all local stories you want right in the palm of your hand.

Icon for mobile apps

McClatchy Washington Bureau App

View Newsletters

Subscriptions
  • Newsletters
Learn More
  • Customer Service
  • Securely Share News Tips
  • Contact Us
Advertising
  • Advertise With Us
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service


Back to Story