Brazil's key diplomatic support of Iran's increasingly isolated regime is baffling the international community. There are several theories about Brazil's behavior, some of them quite troubling.
In recent days, as the traditionally cautious United Nations International Atomic Energy Agency finally concluded that Iran is likely to be developing a nuclear weapon, and even Russia began to distance itself from Iran, Brazil announced that President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva will go ahead with plans to visit Iran on May 15.
Brazil, one of the world's new rising powers, will thus be giving much-needed legitimacy to a regime that, in addition to dodging international nuclear energy rules, is considered by much of the world a leading sponsor of terrorism.
Iran is known to aid Islamic terrorist groups such as Hezbollah, and it publicly vows to wipe a nearby country -- Israel -- off the face of the earth. Even Argentina's populist government, which normally sides with Brazil on foreign-policy issues, says Iran was behind the 1990s Hezbollah terrorist bombings in Buenos Aires.
Late last year, Lula raised eyebrows throughout the world when he gave a red-carpet welcome in Brasilia to Iranian strongman Mahmud Ahmadinejad. Brazil thus became one of the first nonradical countries to give its blessings to Ahmadinejad after Iran's highly controversial June 12, 2009, elections.
Why is Brazil risking its reputation as a good international citizen by doing this? Among the most widespread theories:
The Brazilian president, who recently predicted that Brazil will be the world's fifth biggest economy within a decade, wants to send a message that his country is a new global player that will have to be taken seriously. So the theory goes: What better way to grab the world's attention than playing a role in the biggest international conflict of the moment?
Though it's hard to believe that Lula could solve anything in the Middle East -- during a recent visit to the United Arab Emirates and Israel, I didn't run into one single person who told me that Lula has a chance of succeeding where powerful U.S., French and Russian mediators have failed -- the Brazilian president may honestly think he will be able to make history.
Late last year, Brazil's vice president, Jose Alencar, created a ruckus when he said Brazil should have the right to have nuclear weapons. Lula's spokesman immediately clarified that the vice president was not reflecting the government's views, reminding the world that Brazil is barred from producing nuclear weapons by Latin American treaties and by Brazil's own constitution.
My opinion: It's a combination of the first theory, hubris, and the second, diplomatic day-dreaming. But I can't keep from wondering whether hubris won't lead sooner or later to greater nuclear ambitions.
For the time being, Brazil's overtures to Ahmadinejad are sabotaging international efforts to pressure Iran to abide by U.N. agreements, and are emboldening a repressive regime at home.
Rather than behaving like a responsible emerging power, Brazil is acting like a reckless newcomer seeking world attention at any cost.
ABOUT THE WRITER
Andres Oppenheimer is a Miami Herald syndicated columnist and a member of The Miami Herald team that won the 1987 Pulitzer Prize. He also won the 1999 Maria Moors Cabot Award, the 2001 King of Spain prize, and the 2005 Emmy Suncoast award. He is the author of Castro's Final Hour; Bordering on Chaos, on Mexico's crisis; Cronicas de heroes y bandidos, Ojos vendados, Cuentos Chinos and most recently of Saving the Americas. E-mail Andres at aoppenheimer @ herald.com Live chat with Oppenheimer every Thursday at 1 p.m. at The Miami Herald.