New details emerge on how the bailout would work
- Story | California lawmakers skeptical of historic financial bailout
- Story | Groups say bailout doesn't do enough to aid homeowners
- Story | Hostile Congress likely to revise Wall Street bailout plan
- Story | House votes to rein in credit-card fees, interest rates
- Story | Obama concedes that bailout costs may force him to adjust plans
- Story | As Congress rushes to back bailouts, a senator cries foul
- On the Web | The Economy in Turmoil
By Kevin G. Hall | McClatchy Newspapers
WASHINGTON — What Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke didn't say before the Senate Banking Committee on Tuesday was as important as what they did say about their proposed $700 billion bailout of the financial system. Here's a closer look at important fine points of their testimony.
Q: Would this vast sum of money be limited to mortgage-backed securities and mortgage loans?
A: No. Although they're selling the plan publicly that way, arguing that it's vital to get the housing market back on track, Paulson acknowledged that he wants to have discretion to take in virtually any kind of asset for which there is no market.
That's important because it suggests that Treasury is worried broadly about securitization — the process by which loans of all sorts are pooled together and packaged for sale to investors as asset-backed securities. It suggests that there could be a buyer's strike for bonds backed by car loans, student loans and credit-card debt similar to the one occurring now for mortgage-backed securities. That could be devastating for consumers who depend on credit for big purchases.
Q: The $700 billion plan would involve Treasury issuing more debt to pay for the "bad assets" it will be taking in. How do we know there will be buyers?
A: We don't. When asked that question directly, Paulson skirted it by saying he and Bernanke are talking with counterparts in Europe and elsewhere, urging them to take steps like those taken here.
Treasury plans to finance the $700 billion by issuing new debt. It's not clear what terms must apply for there to be buyers for that debt. Japan and China traditionally have been the biggest buyers of Treasury debt. But they may have a changed view of the safety and soundness of investing in U.S. government-issued debt now. If they demand a higher yield for this debt, that could drive up U.S. consumer-lending rates.
Q: Will the Bush administration's plan directly help struggling homeowners avoid foreclosure?
A: Paulson acknowledged that it wouldn't. Many homeowners simply don't have the income to stay in their homes, he said. Bernanke noted that financial markets are interwoven, and since credit markets are clogged up, removing bad assets from the balance sheets of banks and other lenders opens a path for more lending in the broader economy. That could help some people avoid foreclosure. In addition, Democrats in Congress are determined to include language in the bailout plan that helps rescue people facing foreclosure, but the final terms still are being negotiated.
Q: Since banks are moving very slowly to modify distressed mortgages, won't allowing bankruptcy judges to do that help, as some lawmakers suggest?
A: Paulson said Tuesday that such a move would discourage lending, but didn't say how. Democrats are pressing to add such a provision.
Q: Did the government officials hint at the next shoe to drop?
A: Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Christopher Cox pointed to credit-default swaps. These insurance-like instruments are private contracts in which an investor insures against default on a bond or loan by making payments like a premium. In exchange, he gets a big payout if there's a default.
"The $58 trillion notional market in credit default swaps — double the amount outstanding in 2006 — is regulated by no one," Cox said. "Neither the SEC nor any regulator has authority over the CDS market, even to require minimal disclosure to the market."
Americans got a whiff of the danger of credit-default swaps when the Fed rescued American International Group on Sept. 16, providing an $85 billion loan in exchange for taking a 79.9 percent stake in the global insurance giant.
Authorities justified it by citing AIG's presence in foreign markets. What they meant in part was that it'd be a nightmare trying to determine who really owed what to whom in the swaps market if AIG defaulted and avoided settling its commitments in the unregulated swap markets.
Cox called Tuesday for regulation of the swaps market. New York Insurance Commissioner Eric Dinallo on Monday took the first crack at regulating swaps — by issuing guidelines that effectively classified some credit-default swaps as insurance and therefore subject to state regulation.
Paulson called Tuesday for a federal regulator over the insurance industry, which is now governed by 50 different state laws.
MORE FROM MCCLATCHY
To ask a question about this story or any economic question, go to McClatchy's economy Q&A
Economy in turmoil: America confronts the crisis
Lawmakers hostile to Treasury bailout plan, insist on changes
Can you trust a Wall Street veteran with a Wall Street bailout?
McClatchy Newspapers 2008
We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. Obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part — and abiding by these simple rules.
Comments are displayed newest first. If you would like to read a thread from beginning to end, select "Oldest first" from the drop down menu.
@Nyx.CommentBody@