Judge denies attorneys fees in challenge to Texas voter ID law

McClatchy Washington BureauAugust 11, 2014 

— A federal judge on Monday rejected a request for attorneys fees by challengers to a Texas voter ID law.

It was an interesting request, because the challengers momentarily prevailed before a three-judge panel. They also won some tangible benefit, in the resulting delay in the imposition of the photo ID requirements imposed by the state’s SB 14. The three-judge panel’s decision, in time, was vacated by the Supreme Court.

In a somewhat similar case, a judge did award attorneys fees to parties who challenged Texas over redistricting. In that case, too, the challengers temporarily won before a three-judge panel before the Supreme Court vacated the decision as moot.

Noting that “the voter identification law is now in effect” and that “Texas maintained its position throughout this litigation,” U.S. District Judge Rosemary Collyer said the cases were distinguishable. Still, Collyer sounded unimpressed by the legal response by Texas, which she termed “threadbare.”

The challengers sought $353,150.97 in attorneys fees and costs.

McClatchy Washington Bureau is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service