Senate won’t advance measure to ease Hobby Lobby ruling

McClatchy Washington BureauJuly 16, 2014 

Hobby Lobby

Rev. Bruce Prescott, left, applauds during a vigil outside a Hobby Lobby store in Edmond, Okla., Monday, June 30, 2014, in reaction to the Supreme Court's decision that some companies like the Oklahoma-based Hobby Lobby chain of arts-and-craft stores can avoid the contraceptives requirement in President Barack Obama's health care overhaul, if they have religious objections.


The Senate Wednesday was unable to advance legislation aimed at easing the Supreme Court’s June birth control decision.

The Democratic-authored alternative won 56 votes, four short of the 60 needed. Fifty-one Democrats, two independents and three Republicans voted to limit debate. Forty-two Republicans voted no, as did Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada. Reid’s vote was a procedural maneuver. He backs the measure, but voted no so he could move to reconsider at a later time. One Democrat was absent.

The vote was no surprise, as Republicans and Democrats battled over the measure all week.

The effort got a boost Wednesday from the White House, which said it strongly supports the bill.

“The Supreme Court's rulings in Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. v. Burwell, allow some employers to now withhold contraception coverage from their employees based on their own religious beliefs that their employees may not share,” the administration said in a statement. It added it “believes that women should make personal health care decisions for themselves, rather than their employers deciding for them.”

Senate Democratic leaders have been adamant the June Hobby Lobby ruling needs to be eased. “Women should not be denied health care because Republican men are too afraid to debate the issue on the Senate floor,” said Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada.

But a Republican woman--Sen. Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H., is leading an effort to consider an alternative.

She said she plans legislation that will “reaffirm that no employer can prohibit an employee from purchasing an FDA-approved drug or medical device, including contraception.” The bill also is “going to focus on expanding access for women to have access to contraception. And so we have a sense of the Senate and we are asking the FDA to undertake a study to determine whether over-the-counter purchase of contraception is safe and effective for adult women so that we can look at this issue to see, are there ways we can give greater access for women to purchase contraceptives? So that will be included in our bill.”

Finally, she said, “we want to increase affordability” by giving people “greater rights to use health savings accounts and flexible spending accounts.”

McClatchy Washington Bureau is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service