Judge Rosemary Collyer and the art of judicial writing

McClatchy Washington BureauMay 9, 2014 

Is it ever right to start a judicial opinion with a question?

Sure it is!

On Friday, U.S. District Judge Rosemary Collyer shows how to draw in readers with this effective kick-off to a 30-page decision:

What happens when the District of Columbia abruptly stops payments for hundreds of home health care aides to Medicaid beneficiaries? When the D.C. Department of Health Care Finance ceased payments, without prior warning, to fifty-two percent of the providers who care for seventy-nine percent of the city’s needy beneficiaries, chaos ensued. And, thus, this litigation.”

This works well, for a couple of reasons.

The question in the first sentence immediately grabs the reader, who thinks something like: “yes, that’s right, what does happen?” The adjective “abruptly” foreshadows the dire circumstances to come. The “without prior warning” hints at judicial disapproval. The “chaos ensued” quickly and vividly sums up events in the real world, and the use of “And” propels the final sentence.

Nice.

McClatchy Washington Bureau is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service