Supreme Court declines to hear Alaska’s ‘Katie John’ waterway case

McClatchy Washington BureauMarch 31, 2014 

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to take up a long-running dispute over management of Alaska’s waterways.

The decision effectively upholds a lower court’s decision in what’s become popularly known as the “Katie John case.” This continues the federal government control’s over hunting and fishing on navigable state-owned waters adjacent to federal land.

The decision, a blow to the state and a victory for the Alaska Federation of Natives, upholds a 2013 decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The state of Alaska had petitioned the high court, seeking review.

“Alaska’s authority over its navigable waters strikes at the core of what it means for Alaska to be a state,” the state’s brief declared.

As is customary, the court did not issue any explanation for the decision not to reconsider the case. Chief Justice John Roberts, Jr., recused himself from participating.

At least four of the Supreme Court’s nine justices must agree to hear a case in order for it to be considered. Only about 75 cases are heard every term, a small percentage of the total number of petitions filed.

McClatchy Washington Bureau is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service