Bell Helicopter loses to Iran in appeals court

Posted by Michael Doyle on November 1, 2013 

An appeals court has shot Bell Helicopter Textron's claims against Iran.

In a 19-page decision Friday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld a trial judge's earlier ruling siding with Iran. The trial judge had vacated a default judgement against the country concerning the manufacture and marketing of a helicopter that resembles Bell’s Jet Ranger 206.

As summarized by the appeals court, "in the 1970s, Bell operated a helicopter plant in Iran, which it abandoned after the Iranian revolution of 1979. In December 2002, Bell became aware that the Iran Aircraft Manufacturing Industrial Company, a company wholly owned and controlled by the Iranian government, was using the plant to manufacture helicopters that resembled the Jet Ranger 206."

Bell sued in 2006, Iran was a no-show in court and so Bell won a default judgment of $22,035,002.28 plus attorneys fees. Iran subsequently got the judgment tossed out.

The appeals court, in a decision written by Judge Judith W. Rogers, reasoned in part that Bell could not exploit the commercial activity exemption in the Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act (whose intent is just as it sounds) because of a "lack of evidence that Iran’s commercial activity caused a 'direct effect' in the United States."



McClatchy Washington Bureau is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service