Justice Department is investigating Shell’s Arctic drilling

McClatchy NewspapersMarch 27, 2013 


Problems on the Shell's Arctic Challenger, shown on September 17, 2012, at the Port of Bellingham in Washington, caused Shell to give up for the year on drilling for oil in the Arctic waters off Alaska.

PHILIP A. DWYER — Bellingham Herald/MCT

— The Coast Guard has asked the Justice Department to investigate possible pollution violations by both the drilling rigs Shell used in its botched efforts to explore for oil last year in the Arctic Ocean waters off the northern coast of Alaska.

Coast Guard Rear Adm. Thomas Ostebo said Wednesday that he’d turned over to the Justice Department for review and possible prosecution an investigation into the troubled Shell drilling rig Kulluk. Ostebo said it was an “investigation into potential Marpol violations.”

Marpol is short for marine pollution, and it’s a name used to refer to the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution From Ships.

The Coast Guard earlier had sent the Justice Department a list of 16 safety and environmental violations by the other rig used in Shell’s Arctic efforts, the Noble Discoverer.

“As the Coast Guard and Department of Justice are still actively engaged in these investigations, it would not be appropriate for me to provide additional information at this time,” Ostebo said at a Senate hearing in Anchorage, Alaska, chaired by Alaska Democratic Sen. Mark Begich.

Shell Alaska Vice President Pete Slaiby said at the hearing that he also wouldn’t discuss any matters under investigation, but he defended Shell’s efforts.

“Our drilling operations were completed safely and successfully. . . . It was while leaving the theater of operations that issues with the Discoverer were identified by the Coast Guard and the Kulluk ran aground,” Slaiby said.

The Kulluk was grounded for several days off Kodiak Island after a New Year’s Eve storm. Ostebo, who’s the Coast Guard’s commander for Alaska, said the grounding was an “event that highlights the rigors of operating in Alaskan waters.”

Ostebo said the Coast Guard was investigating the Kulluk grounding with help from experts with the National Transportation Safety Board and the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement. Such an investigation might several take months to complete.

The Noble Discoverer was found to have 16 violations after a Coast Guard inspection at the end of November. They included pollution control problems and a finding that the vessel couldn’t go fast enough to maneuver safely in rough Arctic conditions.

The rigs were able to drill only a partial well apiece. The Interior Department says Shell won’t be allowed to drill the Arctic waters again until it presents a plan that shows it can handle the conditions. “Shell screwed up in 2012,” Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said this month.

Shell has dropped plans to drill in Arctic waters this year in the wake of the problems, but the company promises to return at a "later stage."

Shell has spent more than $4.5 billion on its efforts to drill off the Alaska coast. David Lawrence, Shell’s executive in charge of exploration in the Arctic and the rest of North America, has announced that he’s resigning from the company. Lawrence told Dow Jones Newswires last year that the drilling off the northern coast of Alaska would be “relatively easy.”

Last summer, Shell was the first company in two decades to drill in Alaska’s Arctic waters. “It marked an historic re-entry into the U.S. Arctic offshore. . . . The first step to validating the enormous offshore resource potential,” Shell executive Slaiby said Wednesday.

Environmental groups are calling on the Obama administration to shut down the Arctic offshore drilling program, but the president has declined to do so.

“The administration is committed to supporting safe and responsible exploration of potential energy resources in frontier areas such as the Arctic,” Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Director Tommy Beaudreau said Wednesday.

Email: scockerham@mcclatchydc.com; Twitter: @seancockerham

McClatchy Washington Bureau is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service