U.N. numbers on Syrians in need of help far too low, survey suggests

McClatchy NewspapersFebruary 18, 2013 


Three hundred people a day arrive at the Atma camp for displaced persons in northern Syria, adding to the 20,000 already there. There's no heat, water or electricity in the flimsy tents, which allow water in during rainstorms.


— The first detailed survey of the humanitarian crisis in northern Syria suggests that the United Nations has grossly underestimated the number of civilians in dire need of assistance, a situation that experts say plays down the scope of the catastrophe.

“Syria is the largest IDP crisis in the world,” said Clare Spurrell of the Internal Displacement Monitoring Center, the leading body monitoring internally displaced people worldwide. “The longer we underestimate the reality of what is happening on the ground, the further we are getting from an appropriate response.”

The Office of the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees released new figures Monday showing 2.08 million people in urgent need in six provinces of northern Syria. That’s way below a partial survey of the same provinces that the Syrian opposition and 10 international aid agencies conducted over four weeks in January.

That survey, undertaken by teams of researchers who met with local relief committees, religious leaders and local police, among others, estimated that the number of people in urgent need totaled at least 3.2 million in those provinces: Idlib, rural Aleppo, Latakia, Raqqa, Hasaka and Deir el Zour. That’s nearly three-quarters of the 4.3 million people thought to be living now in the surveyed areas of those provinces.

Of those, the survey found that 1.1 million are people who’ve been forced from their homes, making them dependent on others for food, shelter, health care and clean water.

And the situation is almost certainly worse than that: The researchers completed the survey in only about 40 percent of the provinces’ area and excluded the city of Aleppo, Syria’s largest, where fighting has raged since July. Once the survey is completed in the remaining 60 percent, the numbers are expected to go up.

“The size of the crisis is huge, much bigger than anyone had thought,” said Ghassan Hitto, the director of humanitarian relief for the Syrian Opposition Coalition, the collection of opposition groups that the United States and other countries have recognized as the sole legitimate representative of the Syrian people.

Hitto added that the figure of 3.2 million for those in urgent need of humanitarian aid in 40 percent of the six provinces “throws other numbers used for the entire country out of the water.” Nearly all of Syria’s 14 provinces are now engulfed in fighting.

The survey, whose results were compiled into an interim report titled “Joint Rapid Assessment of Northern Syria,” was released Jan. 27.

A spokeswoman for the U.N.'s Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, Stephanie Bunker, said the U.N. was aware of the survey but didn’t take it into account in the numbers it released Monday. She said the UNHCR’s new figures came from the Syrian Arab Red Crescent, whose leadership is closely tied to the Syrian government.

Mark Bartolini, who retired at the end of last year as the director of the U.S. government’s Office of U.S. Foreign Disaster Assistance, said he believed that the U.N. was “grossly understating the numbers,” though he cautioned that the opposition-sponsored survey may overstate the situation.

“It’s never going to be perfect,” he said. “But in this case, it’s pretty far off.”

The United States says it relies on the United Nations’ numbers and has made no estimate of its own on the scope of the humanitarian crisis in Syria. Based on the current estimate of needs, the U.S. has provided $355 million for assistance.

Why the United Nations would underestimate the number of Syrians in need of assistance is unclear, but the issue affects all the U.N.'s numbers. The website for the Humanitarian Affairs office shows just 4 million people in urgent need of humanitarian assistance and 2 million internally displaced – for the entire country.

Valerie Amos, the U.N.’s undersecretary for humanitarian affairs, did make use of the opposition-sponsored survey’s results in a presentation at a donors conference Jan. 30 in Kuwait, where she sought $1.5 billion in assistance for Syrians in need.

But even then her presentation understated the situation, when she failed to note that the 3.2 million people the survey identified as in need were in less than 50 percent of the six surveyed provinces.

“Her figures are out of context,” said a West European humanitarian aid expert who provided advice for the opposition survey. The aid expert asked not to be named as he hadn’t been designated to be a spokesman for the study.

Amos’ spokeswoman did not explain Amos's use of the statistics, despite repeated email and telephone requests by McClatchy.

What the true numbers are is difficult to say, however. A simple mathematical computation would suggest that if 3.2 million people in the area surveyed are in need of food aid, the country as a whole may hold as many as 15 million hungry people. The area surveyed represents at most 21 percent of the country’s population.

Hitto said the opposition and the international aid groups that had helped conduct the survey – all of whom asked not to be identified because of the sensitivity of their work – had agreed that they wouldn’t make such extrapolations, waiting instead for the completion of the research.

The U.S. government admits that it has doubts about the U.N. numbers, but it’s sticking to them anyway.

At a news conference Jan. 25 in Ankara, Turkey, Nancy Lindborg, a top official at the U.S. Agency for International Development, called the U.N. numbers “a starting point,” and on Feb. 6, a top State Department official cautioned that the U.N. numbers might not be correct.

Still, said Anne Richard, the assistant secretary of state for population, refugees and migration, “We’re using their numbers.”

“It’s such a chaotic situation inside Syria, I think you are right to be skeptical of any numbers you hear, but we’re using the U.N.’s numbers, and those are the best available.”

In a telephone interview last week, Lindborg didn’t dispute that the number of people in need might be as many as 15 million. “I can’t tell you definitively right now what is the right number,” she said. “The numbers are unacceptably large, whichever one is correct and accurate.”

The numbers, however, show how little aid is being provided to ease the humanitarian cost of the civil war. The U.N. says it’s providing food aid to only 1.5 million Syrians.

CORRECTION: This story has been updated to correct an error in the U.N. affiliation of Stephanie Bunker in Paragraph 10.

Email: rgutman@mcclatchydc.com; Twitter: roygutmanmcc

McClatchy Washington Bureau is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service