Obama agrees to let Congress see secret legal memo on drone program

McClatchy NewspapersFebruary 6, 2013 

US NEWS DRONE-MARINES LA

January 9, 2010: a Predator unmanned drone flies a training mission over Victorville, California.

DON BARTLETTI — Los Angeles Times/MCT

  • More information The senators who sent a letter to President Barack Obama asking that he give Congress “any and all legal opinions that lay out the executive branch’s official understanding of the president’s authority to deliberately kill Americans” were: Ron Wyden, D-Ore., Mike Lee, R-Utah, Mark Udall, D-Colo., Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, Jeff Merkley, D-Ore., Susan Collins, R-Maine, Richard Durbin, D-Ill., Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., Tom Udall, D-N.M., Mark Begich, D-Alaska and Al Franken, D-Minn.

— President Barack Obama on Wednesday ordered the Justice Department to share with Congress a classified memo that explains the legal rationale that justifies the targeted killing of Americans suspected of being members of al Qaida.

The decision came after years of refusing to make the memo available and two days after a Justice Department "white paper" that described the memo’s contents was made public. The memo provides the legal framework for U.S. drone attacks that have killed at least three American citizens and as many as 3,500 others.

Obama’s counter terrorism adviser, John Brennan, Obama’s nominee to head the CIA, is expected to face tough questioning over the program Thursday from the Senate Intelligence Committee considering his nomination.

“Today, as part of the president’s ongoing commitment to consult with Congress on national security matters, the president directed the Department of Justice to provide the congressional intelligence committees access to classified Office of Legal Counsel advice related to the subject of the Department of Justice white paper,” the White House said in a statement emailed to reporters.

A further explanation provided by the White House said Obama made the decision in an effort to include Congress in discussion of the country’s counterterrorism policies. The explanation called the decision "an extraordinary action."

Targeted killing, which began under former President George W. Bush, officially remains a classified CIA program. To date, it is known to involve only missile strikes by unmanned aircraft in Pakistan, Somalia and Yemen against what U.S. officials say are leaders of al Qaida and “associated groups” plotting imminent attacks on U.S. targets.

The Obama administration repeatedly has denied requests that the memo justifying the program be released and has fought in court to keep it secret. In December, a federal judge in Manhattan rejected a request that the memo be made public under the country’s Freedom of Information Act.

A bipartisan coalition in Congress that includes both liberal Democrats and conservative Republicans nevertheless have demanded that the memo be made public, most recently on Monday when three Republican and eight Democratic senators wrote the president asking that he share the memo.

Obama’s decision to allow members of the House and Senate intelligence committees to see the memo came after the publication of a so-called "white paper" that described the reasoning behind the Justice Department memo. U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., chairwoman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said the 16-page white paper had been provided to her committee last June and had provided the background the committee needed to oversee the drone program. The memo leaked to NBC News, which published it Monday.

Critics of the drone program immediately attacked the logic described in the paper, saying it relied on a misinterpretation of both U.S. and international law, and misconstrued the definition of "imminent" in its search to justify the killing of people who had not been accused of a crime.

The paper asserts that the government has the constitutional power to kill a U.S. citizen who is believed to be a leader of al Qaida or an “associated force” and is in another country “actively engaged in planning operations to kill Americans.”

The memo said that three conditions must be met: “An informed, high-level official of the U.S. government has determined that the targeted individual poses an imminent threat of violent attack against the United States; (2) capture is infeasible, and the United States continues to monitor whether capture becomes feasible, and (3) the operation would be conducted in a manner consistent with applicable law of war principles.”

The white paper, however, spells out rules under which such attacks can be ordered that appear to be much less stringent that what administration officials have said.

It says, for example, that the United States isn’t required “to have clear evidence that a specific attack on U.S. persons and interests will take place in the immediate future.”

It also says the United States has the right under international law to act under the suspicion that an attack might take place.

“It must be right that states are able to act in self-defense in circumstances where there is evidence of further imminent attacks by terrorist groups even if there is no specific evidence of where such an attack will take place or of the precise nature of the attack,” it says. “Delaying action . . . would create an unacceptably high risk that the action would fail and that American casualties would result.”

Several experts called that an exaggerated rewrite of the legal definition of “imminence,” something that the administration has labeled “elongated imminence.”

The three Americans killed under the program all died in drone strikes in Yemen in 2011. They were Anwar al Awlaki, a New Mexico native Obama administration officials claim was the operations chief of al Qaida’s Arabian Peninsula branch; Samir Khan, an Islamist writer who grew up in New York City and whose family now lives in North Carolina, and Awlaki’s teenage son, Abdulrahman, who was born in Colorado. The elder Awlaki and Khan were killed on Sept. 30, 2011; the younger Awlaki died in a separate drone strike two weeks later.

Jonathan S. Landay contributed to this report.

Email: mseibel@mcclatchydc.com; Twitter: @markseibel

McClatchy Washington Bureau is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service