• Posted on Monday, December 10, 2012
  • Bookmark and Share
  • email
  • |
  • print
  • |
  • rss

tool name

close
tool goes here

Poll: Voters want soft fiscal cliff landing, but offer no net

Dept of Treasury - cropped

The Department of Treasury in Washington, D.C. | Tish Wells/McClatchy

email this story print this story jump to comments
More information METHODOLOGY This survey of 1,246 adults was conducted Dec. 4-6. Adults 18 years of age and older residing in the continental United States were interviewed by telephone. Telephone numbers were selected based upon a list of telephone exchanges from throughout the nation. The exchanges were selected to ensure that each region was represented in proportion to its population. To increase coverage, this landline sample was supplemented by respondents reached through random dialing of cellphone numbers. The two samples were then combined and balanced to reflect the 2010 census results for age, gender, income, race and region. Results are statistically significant within plus or minus 2.8 percentage points. There are 1,091 registered voters. The results for this subset are statistically significant within plus or minus 3.0 percentage points. The error margin increases for cross-tabulations.

More on this Story

What should we do about the fiscal cliff?

View larger image

Americans clearly want Washington to solve its looming budget crisis, and they clearly reject almost every option to do that, according to a new McClatchy-Marist Poll.

The only option that voters endorse, by a ratio of 3-to-2, is to raise taxes on the wealthy.

A majority oppose other often-discussed options, including raising taxes on everyone, cutting Medicaid or Medicare spending, raising the age for Medicare, or taking away tax deductions for charitable contributions or home mortgage interest.

The survey helps explain why it’s so difficult for Washington to solve a problem everyone sees and everyone wants fixed.

President Barack Obama and Republican House Speaker John Boehner met secretly Sunday but there is still no sign that they’re moving toward a deal that could win support from both the Democrats who oppose any cuts in government spending or benefits and from the Republicans who oppose all tax increases.

“No one is very enamored of anything,” said Lee M. Miringoff, director of the Marist College Institute for Public Opinion in New York, which conducted the national survey of registered voted Dec. 4-6 for McClatchy.

Voters do see the fiscal mess of expiring tax cuts and looming spending cuts as a crisis that needs to be solved.

By 78 percent to 22 percent, they say they’re concerned about it, and by 75 percent to 21 percent, they say it’s more important for government officials to compromise to find a solution rather than standing on principle even if it means continued gridlock.

“They think a deal needs to be struck and they think it matters,” said Miringoff.

The one thing that voters support is letting the Bush tax cuts expire as scheduled on Dec. 31 – and thus raising taxes – for individual income above $200,000 and family income above $250,000.

Voters support that 57 percent to 40 percent.

Despite the solid majority in favor, the proposal backed by Obama is the most divisive, with Democrats supporting it 75 percent to 20 percent, and Republicans opposing it 68 percent to 30 percent.

If a majority of voters want to raise taxes on higher incomes, they do not want to raise taxes on everyone.

By 74 percent to 20 percent, they oppose letting the Bush tax cuts expire – and therefore raising taxes – on all income levels.

And by 50 percent to 33 percent, they oppose letting the Obama cut in the payroll tax expire as scheduled at the end of the month. The tax finances Social Security.

A plurality or majority also opposes several other high-profile options to cut government spending:

– Voters oppose, by 59 percent to 40 percent, raising the eligibility age for Medicare from 65 to 67. There’s a gender gap on that issue, with women more opposed to raising the age, perhaps reflecting their longer life expectancy.

– Voters oppose cutting overall spending for Medicare, by 74 percent to 23 percent.

– They oppose cutting spending for Medicaid, the program for the poor, by 70 percent to 26 percent.

– They oppose reducing the federal tax deduction for home mortgage interest, by 67 percent to 29 percent.

– They oppose eliminating the tax deduction for charitable contributions, by 69 percent to 28 percent.

“None of these things are attractive to a majority,” said Miringoff.

There are partisan differences.

Democrats are the most opposed to raising the age for Medicare, which could make it difficult for Obama to sell that to members of his party.

Republicans oppose every option mentioned in the survey.

“There’s no clear statement of what Republican voters want to happen. There’s opposition to everything,” said Miringoff.

“If you’re a Republican in Congress looking for what Republican voters are telling you, they’re not telling you much.”

Voters do signal that they will blame somebody if Washington does not solve the fiscal crisis and taxes jump or spending is slashed – but the forecast is mixed.

Overall, 47 percent of registered voters said they’d blame congressional Republicans, 36 percent said they’d blame Obama, 11 percent said they’d blame both, and 6 percent were not sure.

Email:sthomma@mcclatchydc.com; Twitter @stevethomma
  • Bookmark and Share
  • email
  • |
  • print
  • |
  • rss

tool name

close
tool goes here
JOIN THE DISCUSSION

We welcome comments. To post one, you must sign in using either your McClatchyDC login or your login for Facebook, Twitter or Disqus. Just click the appropriate box below.

Please keep your comment civil, short and to the point. Obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. If you find a comment abusive or inappropriate, please flag it for the moderator by placing your cursor on the comment, then clicking the "flag" link that appears. Thanks for your participation.

Stay Connected

Sign up for email newsletters RSS
Follow us on your iPhone Follow us on your Android device
Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us using Google Currents

POLITICS & GOVERNMENT BLOG

Planet Washington

"Planet Washington" is a group blog by journalists in McClatchy's Washington Bureau. Send a story suggestion.

LEGAL AFFAIRS BLOG

Suits & Sentences

"Suits & Sentences" is written by Mike Doyle, who covers the Supreme Court for McClatchy's Washington Bureau. Send a story suggestion.