• Posted on Friday, November 2, 2012
  • Bookmark and Share
  • email
  • |
  • print
  • |
  • rss

tool name

close
tool goes here

Coast Guard to investigate HMS Bounty sinking

Hurricane Sandy

A frame from a video shows a crew member of the HMS Bounty being lifted to a Coast Guard rescue helicopter | (Coast Guard via Raleigh News & Observer/MCT

email this story print this story jump to comments

More on this Story

The Coast Guard announced Friday that it will conduct a formal investigation into the sinking of the tall ship HMS Bounty off the North Carolina coast Monday.

The ship, a 180-foot, 3-masted replica built for a 1962 Marlon Brando movie, had sailed from New London, Conn., on Oct. 25 with a crew of 16 en route to St. Petersburg, Fla.

It began taking on water as it tried to dodge Hurricane Sandy by heading east, far out into the Atlantic. The crew abandoned the ship about 4 a.m. Monday about 90 miles southeast of Cape Hatteras.

Fourteen crewmembers were rescued by Coast Guard helicopters flying out of an air station at Elizabeth City. Another, Claudene Christian, 42, who had joined the crew in May, was pulled from the water that afternoon and couldn’t be revived.

That left the captain, Robin Walbridge, 63, still missing. The Coast Guard called off the search for him Thursday.

The investigation will explore every aspect of the accident, according to the Coast Guard, and will try to answer several questions, including the cause of the accident; whether a failure of material or equipment was involved; and if any misconduct, negligence, inattention to duty, or willful violation of the law on the part of any licensed or certified person contributed to the loss of life.

The ship’s website made it clear that the crew was aware of the hurricane when the Bounty left port. It isn’t specific about the reasoning behind the decision for the Bounty to sail, and surviving crewmembers have not spoken publicly about the trip.

There is a sharp debate on the ship’s Facebook page about the decision to sail. One post notes that relatively slow speed of the Bounty made it vulnerable once the decision was made to sail, reducing its options as the storm approached.

In a forum on the ship’s website, an official posting before it hit the storm indicated that the Bounty was moving at 8.6 knots, or less than 10 miles per hour.

Large ships capable of handling extreme wind and wave conditions sometimes put to sea as major storms approach to avoid damage from smashing into docks and other ships, or going hard aground. The U.S. Navy sent more than two dozen ships, including an aircraft carrier, to sea from Hampton Roads as the hurricane approached.

They were larger and much faster than the Bounty, though, and the goal was for them to dodge the brunt of the storm by steaming at high speeds eastward and out of its path.

Some posts on the Bounty’s Facebook page point out that the crew, at least, would have been safer in port, and that other ships remained in port during the storm without any problems.

Others argue that it made sense to get away from port.

The investigating officer will be Cmdr. Kevin M. Carroll, the chief of the Coast Guard 5th District Marine Inspections and Investigations Branch, based in Portsmouth, Va. He will be assisted by investigating officers from Coast Guard Sector North Carolina in Wilmington.

Such investigations often take months, according to the Coast Guard. They aren’t aimed at placing blame for criminal or civil legal action, but rather are “for the purpose of taking appropriate measures for promoting safety of life and property…”

  • Bookmark and Share
  • email
  • |
  • print
  • |
  • rss

tool name

close
tool goes here
JOIN THE DISCUSSION

We welcome comments. To post one, you must sign in using either your McClatchyDC login or your login for Facebook, Twitter or Disqus. Just click the appropriate box below.

Please keep your comment civil, short and to the point. Obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. If you find a comment abusive or inappropriate, please flag it for the moderator by placing your cursor on the comment, then clicking the "flag" link that appears. Thanks for your participation.

Stay Connected

Sign up for email newsletters RSS
Follow us on your iPhone Follow us on your Android device
Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us using Google Currents