• Posted on Sunday, September 23, 2012
  • Bookmark and Share
  • email
  • |
  • print
  • |
  • rss

tool name

close
tool goes here

Commentary: Doesn't Romney want the 47% on his side?

email this story print this story jump to comments

More on this Story

If 47 percent of Americans really were freeloaders, the way Mitt Romney suggests, don't you think the federal government would be a lot more than $16 trillion in debt?

And if Romney believes that 47 percent of Americans can be written off as automatic Obama votes, doesn't that show that the Republican nominee understands the electorate even less than he understands the real world most of us live in?

It might make a terrific Rush Limbaugh rant, pretending nearly half the country is a bunch of fat slackers who sit around whining. And no doubt there are those among us who do precious little to earn their keep.

But the men who want to lead our nation should be leading a rational and essential conversation about cutting government excess without slashing the social safety net. Instead, Romney is on video from May spouting ill-informed mishmash that he after-the-fact claims is all about debating government's proper role. If only he were doing that.

The Heritage Foundation says more than 67 million Americans rely on the federal government for housing, food, income, student aid and or other assistance, and the number's growing dangerously. (www.herit.ag/PE6TQ9) But it's a mistake to think they're all leeches expecting taxpayers to underwrite their dependence.

It's been widely reported that there are many reasons people don't pay income taxes, including that they qualify for tax breaks such as the Earned Income Credit and child tax credit.

Romney carelessly lumped together people who arguably are too dependent on government with older Americans who've earned their retirement, paid off their mortgages and use the Social Security they paid for. With young people studying toward degrees they've been told will help them achieve the American dream. With workers like the servers who were busing the tables at the private fundraiser where he was writing off people like them.

Even some mega-millionaires don't pay income tax: six of them, according to Internal Revenue Service data about the 400 returns listing the highest adjusted gross income for 2009 (a $202 million average), The New York Times reported. (nyti.ms/P5wljM).

The nonpartisan Tax Policy Center explains that even those who don't owe federal income tax frequently pay payroll and excise taxes, plus sales and property taxes and, except in Texas and a handful of other places, state income tax, too. (bit.ly/nynn0C).

This isn't a contest between productive Americans and parasites.

Plenty of retirees across the political spectrum believe that government does owe them for what they put into the system all those hard-working years.

Military veterans and their families probably do believe that their country owes them healthcare and a decent life for the sacrifices they made -- and they're right.

And taking part in government programs does not make someone a shiftless ingrate.

I'm not convinced that having the government loan qualifying parents money at lower interest rates is the best way to help families afford college. But the program was available when I needed it, and I'm dutifully paying the money back.

I dare say many Americans these days might feel like victims of circumstance or bad luck or a rotten economy. But they may well think government offers nowhere to turn because it's doing a terrible job of helping people like them.

There are hard questions these presidential candidates should be addressing -- we, the people, need solutions.

The New York Times columnist David Brooks, a political conservative, on Monday called Romney "a kind, decent man" who's pretending to be "some sort of cartoonish government-hater." (nyti.ms/QVve74)

A kind and decent candidate should give the impression that he cares about that 47 percent, even if he doesn't expect them to vote for him.

If he gets elected, he's going to have to govern them, too. And he'll want them on his side.

  • Bookmark and Share
  • email
  • |
  • print
  • |
  • rss

tool name

close
tool goes here
JOIN THE DISCUSSION

We welcome comments. To post one, you must sign in using either your McClatchyDC login or your login for Facebook, Twitter or Disqus. Just click the appropriate box below.

Please keep your comment civil, short and to the point. Obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. If you find a comment abusive or inappropriate, please flag it for the moderator by placing your cursor on the comment, then clicking the "flag" link that appears. Thanks for your participation.

Stay Connected

Sign up for email newsletters RSS
Follow us on your iPhone Follow us on your Android device
Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us using Google Currents

FEATURED COLUMNIST

leonard pitts jr.

Miami Herald columnist Leonard Pitts Jr. won the Pulitzer Prize for commentary in 2004. He is the author of the Novel, Before I Forget. Read his latest commentary here.

COMMENTARY AROUND MCCLATCHY

FEATURED COLUMNIST

joe galloway

McClatchy's veteran war correspondent, Joseph L. Galloway, retired in January 2010 after half a century in the newspaper business. Read his farewell column, and an archive of his take-no-prisoners commentary. Here's one of his most-requested columns, "Fridays at the Pentagon."