Attorney defends prosecutor Bottini in Ted Stevens case

McClatchy NewspapersApril 19, 2012 

US NEWS STEVENS 1 MCT

Sen. Ted Stevens (R-AK) appears at a Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, Tuesday, July 29, 2008. Stevens, the longest-serving Republican in the U.S. Senate and one of the chamber's most powerful members, was indicted Tuesday in Washington, a result of a year-long investigation into corruption in Alaska politics. The 7-count indictment comes nearly one year after federal agents raided Stevens' home in Girdwood, a resort town about 40 miles south of Anchorage. (Chuck Kennedy/MCT)

CHUCK KENNEDY — MCT

— Assistant U.S. Attorney Joe Bottini has been wrongfully smeared by allegations he purposely hid evidence from the defense in the case against then-Alaska Sen. Ted Stevens, his attorney said Thursday in the face of calls for Bottini to be fired and even disbarred.

“The special prosecutor decided not to file charges against Joe, but then turned around and publicly declared to the world that he was guilty of the worst thing one can say about a federal prosecutor, that he is dishonest and a cheater,” Bottini’s lawyer, Ken Wainstein, told members of Congress.

Bottini remains a federal prosecutor in Alaska and is working one of the state’s highest profile cases, an alleged militia plot to kill a federal judge.

Alaska Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski and a group called Alaskans for Justice have called for the firing of Bottini and another prosecutor in the case, James Goeke, who was based in Anchorage but now is prosecuting federal crimes in Yakima, Wash.

Wainstein defended Bottini on Thursday in front of the House Judiciary Committee’s subcommittee on crime, terrorism and homeland security, members of which said prosecutors who concealed evidence in the Stevens case ought to be disbarred.

“I don’t understand why anyone who took Ted Stevens’ life should ever be allowed to practice law again,” said Texas Republican Rep. Louie Gohmert, who said he never even liked Stevens but believed the prosecution of him was an injustice.

The subcommittee’s chairman, Wisconsin Republican Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner, said he wanted to see a disbarment investigation of the Stevens prosecution team. “It was probably one of the blackest incidents in the history of the Justice Department,” Sensenbrenner said.

A Washington jury in 2008 found Stevens guilty of seven counts of accepting excessive gifts and failing to report them on his disclosure forms. Shortly afterward, Stevens, a Republican, lost his election bid for a seventh term in the Senate. The Obama administration came into office in the same election and the new attorney general, Eric Holder, said that important evidence had been withheld by the prosecutors under the Bush Justice Department and that the charges should be dismissed.

Stevens died in a plane crash a year later.

Special prosecutor Henry Schuelke last month released a scathing report on Justice Department misconduct in the Stevens case. He singled out Bottini and Goeke for “willful nondisclosure,” and he has suggested the prosecutors were driven by a desire to win at all costs.

Bottini’s attorney, Wainstein, told the congressional subcommittee Thursday that Schuelke’s report is flawed. It was the first time a lawyer for one of the prosecutors has appeared before Congress, and Wainstein said it was in a bid to clear his client’s name.

He described Bottini as a modest, 27-year veteran of the Alaska U.S. Attorney’s Office, and a “model public servant.”

“He’s human, he makes mistakes. He acknowledges he made mistakes, serious mistakes, in the Ted Stevens case … but Joe does not acknowledge, I do not acknowledge, and most importantly the facts don’t acknowledge that he committed those mistakes intentionally in bad faith,” Wainstein said.

Wainstein said Schuelke also failed to consider the chaotic circumstances under which prosecutors were working, including a prosecution team with little supervision and no one in charge, the time crunch after Stevens demanded a speedy trial to have it settled before the election, as well as the “combative defense tactics that kept the prosecutors off-balance once they got into trial.”

Subcommittee members were unsympathetic, especially to the claim that combative defense tactics played a role. Sensenbrenner said Bottini was an experienced prosecutor and there were a “litany of errors” in the case.

Wainstein said Bottini repeatedly tried to bring evidence forward for disclosure and was rebuffed by his superiors in the Justice Department.

Email: scockerham@mcclatchydc.com; Twitter: @seancockerham

McClatchy Washington Bureau is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service