NRA helped spread 'stand your ground' laws across nation

Center for Public IntegrityMarch 26, 2012 

In 2004, the National Rifle Association honored Republican Florida state legislator Dennis Baxley with a plum endorsement: its Defender of Freedom award.

The following year, Baxley, a state representative, worked closely with the NRA to push through Florida's unprecedented "stand your ground" law, which allows citizens to use deadly force if they "reasonably believe" their safety is threatened in public settings.

People no longer would be restrained by a "duty to retreat" from a threat while out in public, and they'd be free from prosecution or civil liability if they acted in self-defense.

Florida's law is now under a cloud as a result of the controversial February shooting of Trayvon Martin, 17, in Sanford, Fla. The 28-year-old shooter, George Zimmerman, who was licensed to carry a gun, said he acted in self-defense after a confrontation with Martin, and some legal experts say Florida's law could protect Zimmerman, who hasn't been charged. Baxley, whose state party has benefited from large NRA donations, contends that his law shouldn't shield Zimmerman at all, because he pursued Martin.

The NRA has been quiet on the matter since the shooting as the nation takes stock — in light of the Martin case and similar examples — of whether "stand your ground" laws are more dangerous than useful to public safety. The gun-rights organization didn't respond to requests for comment. But its silence contrasts with its history of activism on stand-your-ground legislation. Since the Florida measure passed, the NRA has flexed its considerable muscle and played a crucial role in the passage of more than 20 similar laws nationwide.

The Florida law is rooted in the centuries-old English common-law concept known as the "Castle Doctrine," which holds that the right of self-defense is accepted in one's home. But the Florida law and others like it expand that established right to venues beyond a home.

Since Florida adopted its law, the NRA has aggressively pursued stand-your-ground laws elsewhere as part of a broader agenda to increase gun-carrying rights it believes that citizens are rightly due under the Second Amendment.

To gain attention and clout at the state level, the NRA gives money and offers endorsements to legislators from both parties. The NRA and the NRA Political Victory Fund, its political action committee, have donated about $2.6 million to state political campaigns, committees and individual politicians since 2003, according to records compiled by the nonprofit National Institute on Money in State Politics.

And ambitious politicians take note that the NRA is heavily invested and involved in congressional races.

Following the Florida victory, the "Stand Your Ground" movement accelerated. In July 2006, the NRA posted celebratory news on its website, noting that legislators in eight more states — Alabama, Arizona, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kentucky, Mississippi and South Dakota — already had followed Florida's lead.

"This train keeps a rollin' — Castle Doctrine Sweeps America," the NRA's 2006 message said. The campaign, the group said, "is turning focus from criminals' rights to those of the law-abiding who are forced to protect themselves."

Since then, a host of other states have passed various laws expanding the Castle Doctrine. Among them: Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Washington and West Virginia.

To spread the word, the NRA said in an Aug. 12, 2005, website posting, it approached the conservative American Legislative Exchange Council, which drafts legislation for like-minded state lawmakers. The council adopted model stand-your-ground legislative language in 2005 after Florida's top NRA representative made a presentation.

Along the way, key lawmakers benefited from NRA support. In Indiana, for instance, GOP Gov. Mitch Daniels, who took office in 2005, received $12,400 in NRA donations from 2004 to 2008. Georgia Gov. Sonny Perdue got $7,500 from the group from 2004 to 2006. Mark Shurtleff, Utah's attorney general, received $22,500 from 2004 to 2008.

But it hasn't been smooth sailing quite everywhere. An emotional debate in Minnesota this year resulted in passage of a proposal in both houses, which are GOP-controlled, but a veto this month from Democratic Gov. Mark Dayton. A couple of GOP lawmakers changed their votes from no to yes in the course of the legislative process, state records show.

"We had a few people tell us apologetically and privately that they were afraid of the NRA," said Joan Peterson, a Minnesota activist with the Northland chapter of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence. Proponents didn't get enough votes to override Dayton's veto.

Opposition to the laws has gone beyond gun-control activists. Some of the staunchest critics the NRA has faced while promoting "stand your ground" laws have been state police chief's and sheriffs' associations and district attorneys' groups.

In 2007, the Virginia-based National District Attorneys Association issued a report, "Expansions to the Castle Doctrine," warning that the phenomenon "could have significant implications for public safety and the justice system's ability to hold people accountable for violent acts."

Scott Burns, the association's executive director, said legislators' decisions to buck law-enforcement officials on this issue could be explained only by "the volatile issue of guns rights and the Second Amendment." He said that many of these laws, in his opinion, had nothing to do with the true intent of the Castle Doctrine.

How can the Castle Doctrine apply, he said, seven miles from your home, at a shopping mall?

In Florida, the Tampa Bay Times reported that "justifiable homicides" in Florida spiked after the 2005 law, from an average of 34 yearly to more than 100 in 2007.

Prosecutors said the law permitted gang-related assailants from being prosecuted after a 2008 shootout in Tallahassee that killed a 15-year-old boy, the paper reported. A judge dismissed charges based on the "stand your ground" defense.

In 2010, Trevor Dooley, upset about a skateboarder on a Valrico, Fla., basketball court, marched into a park with a handgun, for which he was licensed and legally able to take into the park. Dooley ended up in a confrontation with David James, who was in the park with his young daughter. Dooley and James scuffled, and Dooley shot James dead. In a case that's still pending, Dooley was arrested on suspicion of manslaughter but he claims he's protected by the "stand your ground" law.

Dan Gross, the president of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, accuses the NRA of "feeding on fear and paranoia" to expand concepts such as the Castle Doctrine. His group's research, he said, shows that politicians can survive without an NRA stamp of approval better than they think, and that his priority is to convince more politicians that the group is a "paper tiger."

"We are behind closed doors with politicians all the time," Gross said, "who say they want to do the right thing, but that the gun lobby will ruin them."

Back in Florida, the soul-searching about the law has extended to the legislature. Baxley, its sponsor, told CBS News that "sometimes the application or interpretation of its use is the problem." He defended the law as important to "law-abiding citizens," but suggested, according to other reports, that perhaps legislators should look at limiting crime-watch volunteers' ability to pursue people and confront them.

"Nothing," he said, "is ever finished in the legislature."

(The Center for Public Integrity is a nonprofit organization focused on investigative journalism.)

MORE FROM MCCLATCHY

Trayvon Martin shooting rouses church

After Trayvon Martin, hoodie goes from fashion statement to sociopolitical one

Florida grand jury to probe Trayvon Martin killing

McClatchy Newspapers 2012

McClatchy Washington Bureau is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service