Holder decries states' efforts to restrict ease of voting

McClatchy NewspapersJanuary 16, 2012 

COLUMBIA, S.C. — In his bluntest comments to date, Attorney General Eric Holder said Monday that voting rights, particularly for minorities, are under assault in some states.

Speaking at a Martin Luther King Jr. holiday event in Columbia, Holder said some states had sued to challenge provisions of the Voting Rights Act and had approved new laws that would make it difficult for some minorities to register and vote this year, five decades after King and other civil rights leaders fought for access to the ballot box.

"Each of these lawsuits claims that we've attained a new era of electoral equality, that America in 2012 has moved beyond the challenges of 1965 ... ," Holder told hundreds who gathered outside the domed Capitol. "I wish that were the case. But the reality is that — in jurisdictions across the country — both overt and subtle forms of discrimination remain all too common."

He added: "Protecting the right to vote, ensuring meaningful access, and combating discrimination must be viewed not only as a legal issue but as a moral imperative. And ensuring that every eligible citizen has the right to vote must become our common cause."

Holder's comments come nearly four weeks after the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division ruled that South Carolina's voter identification law was discriminatory because it would make voting harder for minorities, who lack sufficient forms of government-approved ID more often than whites do.

Justice Department officials weighed in on the law under Section 5 of the 1965 Voting Rights Act, which requires approval of proposed voting-law changes in 16 mostly Southern states because they have histories of discrimination.

"We'll also continue to review other types of changes to our election systems and processes — including to the procedures governing third-party voter registration organizations, to early voting procedures and to photo identification requirements — to ensure that there is no discriminatory purpose or effect, " Holder said.

South Carolina is one of 13 mostly Republican-controlled states that have approved new voting laws that include requiring government-approved photo ID to register or vote, shortening early voting periods and curtailing voter registration efforts by third-party groups such as the League of Women Voters or the NAACP.

Supporters of the new laws say they're needed to protect against voter fraud. Several studies and investigations — including a five-year probe by President George W. Bush's Justice Department — indicate that voter fraud in the United States is negligible, however.

Opponents view the new laws as a thinly veiled attempt to suppress the votes of minorities, the elderly and the young — key voting blocs for the Democratic Party.

An October study by New York University's Brennan Center for Justice estimated that the new laws would adversely affect more than 5 million voters nationwide, mostly minorities who lack sufficient government-sanctioned photo IDs or the materials to obtain the IDs.

"The spate of recent laws — the state ID laws, the laws that cut out voting on Sundays. The rationale of voter fraud — when we know the evidence of significant voter fraud is zero," said Norman Ornstein, a political research scholar at the American Enterprise Institute. "I'm left with the conclusion that it's an attempt to shape the electorate. I really view these as a modern-day equivalent of a poll tax."

Most of the Republican presidential contenders have derided the Justice Department's ruling on South Carolina's voter law as unwarranted federal meddling.

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich of Georgia, former Sen. Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania and Texas Gov. Rick Perry have accused the Obama administration of turning a blind eye to voter fraud and President Barack Obama's re-election campaign of trying to steal the 2012 election.

Perry, whose state's voting laws are under Justice Department review, told a restaurant crowd last week in Blythewood, S.C., that the Palmetto State is at war with Washington.

"You're in a war with the federal government," he said. "When they walk in with their Department of Justice and they are going to take you to task, so to speak — sue your state for a voter identification law that your Legislature says should be allowed — this right to vote should be protected."

Such arguments didn't appear to faze Holder on Monday.

"We need — and the American people deserve — election systems that are free from discrimination, free from partisan influence and free from fraud," he said. "And we must do everything within our power to make certain that these systems are more, not less, accessible to the citizens of this country."

MORE FROM MCCLATCHY

Romney's Bain made millions as S.C. steelmaker went bankrupt

GOP's Iowa race tightens, poll finds, as contenders urge support

Santorum savors boost from poll, promises to compete everywhere

Santorum is peaking in Iowa, but then what?

Check out McClatchy's politics blog: Planet Washington

McClatchy Newspapers 2012

McClatchy Washington Bureau is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service