GOP candidates still talking strong on immigration

McClatchy NewspapersJanuary 8, 2012 

WASHINGTON — When it comes to illegal immigration, Republican presidential candidates are talking like it's 1999.

Listening to the GOP White House aspirants, voters might not know that the number of illegal immigrants in the United States is down, attempted border crossings are at a 40-year low and President Barack Obama has deported undocumented workers at twice the rate as his predecessor.

With slight variations, the top GOP candidates back mass deportations, tough state enforcement laws and extending the 675-mile fence along the U.S.-Mexico border, where illegal crossings were near their highest back in 1999. The top Republican candidates also oppose giving most illegal immigrants a path to legal residency.

"Border crossings are at a historic low, deportations are at a historic high, yet every Republican presidential candidate says the first thing we have to do is secure the border," said Frank Sharry, executive director of America's Voice, a Washington group that wants immigration enforcement to focus on serious criminals and national security threats.

The issue will likely heat up in the next two weeks as the White House hopefuls

campaign to win South Carolina's first-in-the-South Republican primary Jan. 21.

Illegal immigration has long been a hot-button topic in South Carolina, where U.S. Sen. Jim DeMint was lionized among Republican activists for his leading role in killing 2007 reform legislation he branded as amnesty.

Conservative radio commentator Rush Limbaugh mocked South Carolina U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham as "Senator Grahamnesty" for his efforts to pass the measure, and Graham has since adopted harder positions on illegal immigration.

Now, a federal judge has blocked an S.C. immigration-enforcement law that was to have taken effect Jan. 1.

Sharry, other pro-immigration advocates and Hispanic lawmakers criticized former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney last week for vowing as president to veto the Dream Act, a bill that would provide legal residency to illegal immigrants who attend college or serve in the military and who entered the country before the age of 16.

Charlie Black, a North Carolina native and prominent Republican consultant who ran President Ronald Reagan's winning 1980 campaign, now is advising Romney.

Black acknowledged that Romney's hard-line immigration stance runs counter

to Reagan, who granted the nation's last broad amnesty, and to Black's support for

comprehensive reforms providing a path to legal residency.

"That's the right thing to do, but I'm not running for president and Romney is," Black told McClatchy. "He's entitled to his own view, and I support him."

While Romney used the immigration issue to skewer GOP rival Rick Perry, the governor of Texas, in an early debate, other influential Republicans have warned about reversing the inroads Reagan, President George W. Bush and 2008 GOP nominee John McCain made among Hispanics, the country's fastest-growing demographic group with 21.7 million eligible voters _almost three times the 7.7 million in 1988.

"The Republican Party has to discuss [immigration] in as humane a way as possible," McCain told CNN last month. "We have to have empathy, we have to have concern and we have to have a plan."

Former Bush adviser Karl Rove and former House Republican leader Dick Armey also have warned against alienating Hispanics.

Their advice has not been heeded.

Former U.S. Sen. Rick Santorum's calls for mass deportations and opposition to any leniency helped him in Iowa, where he came within eight votes of defeating Romney in the Jan. 3 GOP presidential caucuses.

Romney and other rivals pilloried former House Speaker Newt Gingrich for saying in a November debate that undocumented workers who've been in the country for decades should be given a chance to gain legal status.

Under attack, Gingrich issued an "immigration fact sheet" detailing his past tough

stances. He flew to South Carolina and declared his support for the state's beefed-up

enforcement law, now enjoined by a federal judge.

An MSNBC poll last month of likely voters in South Carolina's presidential primary showed them split over a key issue, with 46 percent backing and 48 opposing "limited amnesty for some illegal immigrants."

DeMint introduced a bill in November to prevent the Justice Department from suing South Carolina, Arizona, Alabama, Georgia and other states that have passed toughened immigration laws.

"It's absurd that the Obama administration, which has failed to enforce the nation's immigration laws, is now stopping (states) from taking commonsense steps to protect citizens and uphold the law," DeMint said. "South Carolina has a duty to uphold the law and to protect our citizens from criminals who are in the country illegally."

Those states have suffered setbacks in federal courts. In the most recent ruling, U.S. District Judge Richard M. Gergel last month suspended provisions of the South Carolina law criminalizing the failure to carry immigration papers and requiring police to check the status of people they stop and suspect of being in the country illegally.

"The weight of the federal courts has sided undeniably with the Department of Justice and against those conservative legislators bent on pursuing a starvation strategy against their states' undocumented population," said Angela Kelly, an immigration analyst with the Center for American Progress, a liberal think tank in Washington.

The U.S. Supreme Court will take up Arizona's law later this year in a potential decision that will likely be applied to other states.

Hispanic lawmakers and advocates find irony in the claims by DeMint, Romney,

Santorum and other Republicans that Obama has been soft on illegal immigration.

The federal government deported a record 395,000 foreigners in 2009 and 387,000 in 2010, compared with 189,000 in 2001 and 165,000 in 2002 — George W. Bush's first two years in office.

The number of illegal immigrants in the United States has dropped to 11.2 million from its peak of 12 million in 2007.

It fell in South Carolina from 70,000 to 55,000 in the same period and from 375,000 to 325,000 in North Carolina, according to the Pew Hispanic Center, a Washington policy group.

The number of people apprehended by the U.S. Border Patrol while trying to enter the country illegally plummeted to 340,000 last year, one-fifth its peak of nearly 1.7 million in 2000.

"It indicates that fewer people are trying to come over," Sharry said. "It's mostly because of the (poor) economy and because enforcement has become more effective."

Meanwhile, GOP presidential candidates don't seem to have noticed the decline. Their attacks on illegal immigration, some analysts say, could sabotage a chance to cut into Obama's political base.

A Pew Hispanic Center survey found widespread anger among Hispanic voters over Obama's deportation levels and his failure to fulfill 2008 campaign promises to pursue comprehensive reforms that would give a path to permanent residency or citizenship to some illegal immigrants.

Yet in the same survey, Obama trounced Romney and Perry by 3-1 margins among Hispanic voters in head-to-head matchups.

In a remarkable protest by a fellow Democratic lawmaker, U.S. Rep. Luis Gutierrez of Illinois was arrested last July when he joined a rally outside the White House against Obama's deportation rate.

Clarissa Martinez will direct get-out-the-vote efforts for the National Council of La Raza, an advocacy group based in Washington. She plans to dispatch door-to-door canvassers to key swing states with large Hispanic populations, among them Florida, Colorado, Nevada, Pennsylvania and North Carolina.

"By being so anti-immigrant, the Republicans are missing a huge opportunity," Martinez said. "They are pushing Latinos towards the Democrats."

MORE FROM McCLATCHY

As GOP's race quickens, Romney's on top and the target

Romney edges Santorum for Iowa win-by eight votes

Analysis: Romney tax plan would most benefit wealthy

Check out McClatchy's politics blog: Planet Washington

McClatchy Newspapers 2012

McClatchy Washington Bureau is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service