WASHINGTON — Congressional Republicans on Tuesday escalated their case against the California high-speed rail program, with calls for an independent audit by a non-partisan watchdog agency.
Led by House Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy, R-Bakersfield, Calif., the GOP lawmakers formally requested a review by the Government Accountability Office. In particular, the congressional skeptics want a closer look at California's ridership and cost projections.
"Allowing the money of hard-working Americans to be wasted on a questionable project with many unanswered questions would be an abdication of our responsibilities," McCarthy wrote in a letter signed by 11 other House members. Ten of the letter's signers are from California.
Because of the agency's carefully maintained reputation for neutrality and thoroughness, a GAO study could effectively shape both public and political attitudes toward the California project. One way or another, it's likely to become ammunition.
"As one of the largest projects in the country and as one of the largest job creators in the country, we realize this project deserves careful review," acknowledged Tom Umberg, chairman of the California High-Speed Rail Authority Board.
Umberg, in a statement Tuesday, added that it is "more than appropriate" for the Government Accountability Office to weigh in.
The GAO seems likely to heed the request, whose backers include Rep. Jeff Denham, R-Atwater, Calif., and two House committee chairmen in addition to McCarthy. Separately, McCarthy and other Republican lawmakers have introduced legislation to mandate a GAO study.
One of the chairmen urging the GAO audit, Rep. John Mica, R-Fla., already used his House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee position last week to convene a hearing designed to showcase criticism of California's ambitious plan.
"The California project is turning out to be an additional disaster in a long list of projects touted for high speed rail," Mica declared at the start of last week's four-hour hearing.
The latest business plan prepared by the California High-Speed Rail Authority anticipates a $98.5 billion price tag over the next 20 years, more than twice the original cost. Planners anticipate connecting Los Angeles to San Francisco with trains traveling through the San Joaquin Valley at speeds of up to 220 miles per hour.
California voters have approved a $9.9 billion bond measure. The Obama administration has provided $3.6 billion, plus several hundred million dollars for other California rail projects.
The Republicans' request identifies seven specific areas for investigation. For instance, the lawmakers want the GAO's assessment of the "accuracy of ridership projections" prepared by California high-speed rail planners. By the year 2034, officials have claimed, 30 million riders annually would be traveling at high speeds between Los Angeles and San Francisco.
The House Republicans also want an assessment of how much state and federal funding will be required to complete the California project. Starting in fiscal year 2015, the project's business plan anticipates some $52 billion in federal grants, according to congressional estimates.
Bringing the issue down to the level of the individual rider, the House Republicans also want the Government Accountability Office to investigate what ticket prices would have to be for the project to be self-sustaining.
One skeptic, Elizabeth Alexis of the Palo Alto-based Californians Advocating Responsible Rail Design, predicts taxpayers will be providing a subsidy of nearly $100 per California passenger for the first 30 years.
"Needless to say, the California High-Speed Rail Authority's recently released business plan for the project only raises more questions and concerns," McCarthy and the other lawmakers wrote.
Other Republican lawmakers signing the letter, from California, are Reps. Darrell Issa, John Campbell, Brian Bilbray, Duncan Hunter, Tom McClintock, Gary Miller, Buck McKeon and Devin Nunes. Republican Rep. Bill Shuster of Pennsylvania also signed.
Follow Michael Doyle on Twitter
ON THE WEB
MORE FROM MCCLATCHY
McClatchy Newspapers 2011