New Hampshire sets its primary for Jan. 10

McClatchy NewspapersNovember 2, 2011 

WEST DES MOINES, Iowa — New Hampshire will hold its presidential primary on Jan. 10, filling out the campaign calendar for the initial voting for presidential nominees next winter.

New Hampshire Secretary of State Bill Gardner announced the date, waiting to the last minute to make sure his state again has the first primary.

Iowa will kick off the season, with the first precinct caucuses on Jan. 3. After that, the Republican presidential campaign will head to New Hampshire for a full week. President Barack Obama is not now being seriously challenged for the Democratic nomination.

After New Hampshire, the campaign will move to South Carolina, which will hold its first-in-the-South primary on Jan. 21. South Carolina will offer more-conservative candidates a chance to solidify their gains, or to rebound after a disappointing finish in New Hampshire. In 2000, George W. Bush lost New Hampshire, then rebounded in South Carolina and went on to win the nomination. Several candidates already are investing time or money in South Carolina, including Rep. Michele Bachmann of Minnesota and Gov. Rick Perry of Texas.

After South Carolina, the campaign moves down Interstate 95 to Florida, which will hold its primary on Jan. 31, the first test in a mega-state.

Florida will be the first state voting with a large Hispanic population as part of the mix. And with the winner taking all of its delegates, the state could cement a leading candidate’s momentum – or give new life to an alternative.

The next contest will come Feb. 4 in Nevada, the first in the West.

Party leaders had wanted Nevada to be one of the first four states to vote so that the campaign touched all four regions of the country – first in the Midwest with Iowa, then the Northeast with New Hampshire, then the South with South Carolina, and then the West with Nevada. But after Florida leapfrogged into the early voting, all the early states moved up their dates. Nevada at first picked Jan. 10, but that squeezed New Hampshire and risked a Nevada boycott from the candidates. Nevada ultimately moved back to February.

Follow Steven Thomma on Twitter

For more McClatchy politics coverage visit Planet Washington

More from McClatchy:

Cain's stumbles raise questions about his past, competence

Poll: Texans say Perry's campaign is hurting the state's image

Perry's tax plan would be a boon for the wealthy, study says

McClatchy Washington Bureau is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service