Clinton, Petraeus likely to press Pakistan on Haqqani support

McClatchy NewspapersOctober 19, 2011 

ISLAMABAD — In a rare display of U.S. muscle, the United States' top diplomat, senior-most military officer and its spy chief arrive here Thursday for a tense two-day visit that's likely to focus on U.S. accusations of Pakistani support for an Afghan insurgent group that the U.S. blames for thousands of deaths inside Afghanistan.

The atmosphere is already poisonous between the two "allies," and there is little expectation that the visit by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Army Gen. Martin Dempsey, the new chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and CIA Director David Petraeus, the former U.S. military commander in Afghanistan, will change that.

U.S. officials provided few details of how they intend to approach their meetings here, but expectations are that the trio is coming armed with intelligence to substantiate U.S. allegations that the military-run Inter-Services Intelligence Directorate spy agency is supporting the Haqqani network of insurgents. They're also expected to detail what the U.S. knows of the network's operations inside Pakistan.

The U.S. officials also are likely to tell their Pakistani counterparts that if Pakistan doesn't do more to disrupt Haqqani operations, the U.S. will step up attacks on Afghan insurgents inside Pakistan by unmanned aerial drones and resort more quickly to retaliatory strikes by Afghanistan-based artillery on insurgents firing from Pakistan.

The visit comes as the U.S.-led military coalition in Afghanistan has launched a new campaign in that country's eastern Khost province, which borders Pakistan's North Waziristan region, where the U.S. says the Haqqanis are based. Many in Pakistan fear the campaign could include forays by U.S.-led troops into Pakistan itself.

Last week, a drone strike in North Waziristan killed Jalil Kahn, a top aide to the son of the network's leader. The Pakistanis apparently were not told in advance of U.S. plans to launch the attack, which also killed three other militants.

The U.S. entreaties are likely to be met with exasperation.

For Pakistan, a country reeling from terrorist attacks and a collapsing economy, the continual U.S. demand for it to "do more" is portrayed as blame-shifting to mask American failures in Afghanistan.

On Tuesday, Pakistan's army chief, Gen. Ashfaq Kayani, said during a briefing to parliamentarians that the United States should look to Afghanistan for the answers to its problems there, and not Pakistan. Kayani also warned the United States against an operation on the soil of a nuclear-armed country.

"They (the U.S.) might do it but they will have to think 10 times because Pakistan is not Iraq or Afghanistan," Kayani told the members of parliament's defense committees, according to Pakistani press reports that were confirmed by some of those who attended.

Pakistani analysts say that any hopes Pakistan will change its policy toward the Haqqanis are likely misplaced. Military officials here say Pakistan doesn't want to make enemies of yet another extremist group by attacking the Haqqanis, noting that Pakistan has lost more soldiers in the "war on terror" than has the U.S.-led international force in Afghanistan.

Additionally, the Pakistanis still view the Haqqanis as their best chance to counterbalance what they see as worrisome influence in Afghanistan of Pakistan's archenemy, India. Pakistan's obsession with India, which earlier this month signed a strategic agreement with Afghanistan that included aid to Afghan security forces, drives its Afghanistan policy.

Pakistani suspicions of U.S. intentions are colored also by what is seen here as the anti-Pakistan tone of foreign policy discussions in Washington.

Earlier this month, Bruce Riedel, a former CIA officer who chaired President Barack Obama's 2009 review of U.S. Afghan policy, called for a new policy of containment for Pakistan, saying that American and Pakistani strategic interests "are in conflict."

That was followed by a suggestion by Sen. Mark Kirk, R-Ill., that it could be time to ditch Pakistan and "forge a new alliance with the world's biggest democracy, India."

Still, some in Washington expect the meetings will win some grudging Pakistani concessions.

"They will accommodate parts," said Thomas Lynch, a South Asia expert with the National Defense University. "And they will wait and see how much more cross-border drone activity or artillery activity will follow their partial efforts to meet our demands."

Clinton also will hold a "town hall"-style meeting in Islamabad as part of her visit, attempting to reach out to Pakistanis beyond the officials she'll meet. Students and business people will be among those invited and she will take questions.

For all the rancor and talk of opposing interests, some believe that at their core, Pakistan and American aims in Afghanistan are roughly the same. Both countries want peace and stability, said Shahzad Chaudhry, a retired vice marshal in the Pakistani air force — Pakistan, so that Afghanistan isn't a threat, and the U.S., so that it can exit from a decade-long war.

"The U.S. has short-term aims, to find a face-saving way to walk away from Afghanistan," said Chaudhry. "For us, it is a matter of survival."

(McClatchy special correspondent Shah reported from Islamabad, Landay from Washington.)

MORE FROM MCCLATCHY

U.S. steps up assault on Haqqani stronghold in Afghanistan

Obama warns Pakistan over support for Afghan insurgents

10 years into Afghan war, Pakistan gripped by crises

Follow McClatchy on Twitter.

McClatchy Newspapers 2011

McClatchy Washington Bureau is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service