• Posted on Wednesday, October 5, 2011
  • Bookmark and Share
  • email
  • |
  • print
  • |
  • rss

tool name

close
tool goes here

Edwards case goes before federal judge in late October

email this story print this story jump to comments

RALEIGH — A federal judge will hear arguments later this month on whether the criminal case against John Edwards should be dismissed or move toward trial.

In a court document filed this week, federal court officials set a hearing for Oct. 26.

Edwards, 58, is accused of violating campaign finance laws by secretly obtaining and using contributions from two wealthy supporters to hide his pregnant mistress from the public during his 2008 presidential run.

The payments covered living, medical and other expenses for Rielle Hunter, a videographer with whom Edwards had an extramarital affair and a child. Prosecutors argue the donations exceeded legal limits and were campaign contributions because they were meant to hide the affair so Edwards could keep his presidential bid alive.

Defense attorneys argue that Edwards was trying to hide the affair and pregnancy from his wife, that the hundreds of thousands of dollars that went from his wealthy friends to others, not him, were gifts.

In hundreds of pages of documents filed in September, defense attorneys sought dismissal of the case, arguing that charges against Edwards are unconstitutionally vague, that no crime occurred and even if one had, the government did not give him a "fair warning" that his conduct would violate campaign finance laws.

The lawyers also described the case as an abuse of prosecutorial discretion, more about politics and furthering the political ambitions of the lead prosecutor in North Carolina's eastern district.

The prosecutor, former U.S. Attorney George Holding, has announced plans to run for Congress as a Republican in 2012. A George W. Bush appointee, he was replaced by President Barack Obama once the Edwards investigation concluded.

In response to the defense's claims, prosecutors filed hundreds of pages of court documents disputing allegations of prosecutorial power abuse and inadequacies with the case.

Prosecutors argue that career prosecutors were behind the investigation and that it should be up to a jury to decide whether a crime occurred.

To read more, visit www.newsobserver.com.

  • Bookmark and Share
  • email
  • |
  • print
  • |
  • rss

tool name

close
tool goes here
JOIN THE DISCUSSION

We welcome comments. To post one, you must sign in using either your McClatchyDC login or your login for Facebook, Twitter or Disqus. Just click the appropriate box below.

Please keep your comment civil, short and to the point. Obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. If you find a comment abusive or inappropriate, please flag it for the moderator by placing your cursor on the comment, then clicking the "flag" link that appears. Thanks for your participation.

Stay Connected

Sign up for email newsletters RSS
Follow us on your iPhone Follow us on your Android device
Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us using Google Currents

POLITICS & GOVERNMENT BLOG

Planet Washington

"Planet Washington" is a group blog by journalists in McClatchy's Washington Bureau. Send a story suggestion.