San Joaquin Valley officials speak as one to Congress

McClatchy NewspapersSeptember 14, 2011 

WASHINGTON - San Joaquin Valley officials from Stockton to Bakersfield are putting aside their competitive instincts this week to lobby Congress with one voice.

They've got their work cut out for them, no matter how unified their chorus.

The Valley officials want federal funds for roads and rail. They want money for ports. They want streamlined environmental rules. They want a lot, at the very time a bitterly divided Congress seems inclined to offer less.

"It's hard to ask for money, because they're slashing spending left and right," San Joaquin Mayor Amarpreet Dhaliwal acknowledged Wednesday, "but the Valley has special issues."

Dhaliwal joined some 20 other representatives as part of the annual "Valley Voice" lobbying trip to Washington, sponsored by the San Joaquin Valley Regional Policy Council. For two solid days, the team of transportation managers, planners, mayors, city council members and county supervisors pushed a common agenda.

In particular, the Valley representatives rallied behind a multi-billion dollar transportation authorization bill that would steer money toward highways and railroads. Although the bill covers every state, some of its dollars would come the Valley's way.

Documents distributed by the Valley group identify high-priority highway projects totaling $2.6 billion, many of them involving improvements to State Route 99. The proposed improvements to the famously dreary highway range from work on four San Joaquin County interchanges to road-widening in Tulare and Kern counties.

"We know that there's not a lot of money, but we can also have an impact on policy," Merced Mayor Bill Spriggs said. "Some of the things we're asking for don't cost money."

The Valley wish list includes, for instance, support for a bill by Rep. Kevin McCarthy, R-Bakersfield, to ease the bite of federal air quality standards.

The Valley representatives also want Congress to specify that regions with extremely bad air pollution will have priority in securing certain federal transportation funds.

"We're looking at the transportation bill, and trying to tie it to air quality," Spriggs said.

Lawmakers so far have been stymied in their efforts to craft a full transportation bill, though the House on Tuesday approved by voice vote a short-term extension until March 31, 2012. This latest in a series of extensions is supposed to give House and Senate negotiators more time to work out their differences.

Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer leads the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, which gives the Californians a leg up in angling for a piece of the pie.

Earlier this year, individual Valley counties sent their own delegations to Capitol Hill under similar "one voice" banners. All of these common-ground delegations try to avoid divisive proposals.

This week's lobbying trip, for instance, is steadfastly steering clear of California's politically controversial high-speed rail project, whose initial route runs from Bakersfield to rural Madera County.

"Every day, it's more and more of a boondoggle," Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Visalia, said of the high-speed rail project.

Nunes was one of a number of House members to address the San Joaquin Valley group Wednesday, spending part of his time denouncing Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein. The Valley representatives listened politely, though without necessarily sharing the Republican's vehemence.

"We have to work with Sen. Feinstein," Spriggs noted later.

Washington-based lobbyist Len Simon, whose clients include the cities of Fresno and Hanford and the Council of Fresno County Governments, has coordinated some of these trips, including this week's.

ON THE WEB

Council of Fresno County Governments

MORE FROM MCCLATCHY:

Merced County officials hunt scarce funds on Capitol Hill

California mayors urge caution on federal budget cuts

California's Capitol Hill clout is changing, not disappearing

McClatchy Newspapers 2011

McClatchy Washington Bureau is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service