Experts: Debt deal avoids tackling hard questions

McClatchy NewspapersJuly 31, 2011 

WASHINGTON — The outline emerging Sunday night of a deal to raise the debt ceiling and execute deep cuts in federal spending disappointed budget experts, who feared that the agreement was politically expedient but appeared to fall far short of serious changes to the big cost drivers of government spending.

"If all you can say is this, after 12 weeks of intense wrangling, charges and counter charges, if all they can do is pass the basic debt limit, we're very disappointed," said Steve Bell, a senior director at the Bipartisan Policy Center, a research group comprised of former Democratic and Republican powerbrokers that late last year offered an exhaustive plan to tackle the nations fiscal problems.

What irked Bell and other budget experts was the blueprint emerging from congressional and White House officials that appeared to take off the table serious attempts to address military spending or changes to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid_ the so-called entitlement programs.

Most of the cuts agreed on during three-way negotiations between the White House and Senate leaders from each side of the aisle were in discretionary spending. They agreed to make steep cuts over 10 years to a segment of the budget that accounts for less than a fifth of federal spending.

"It is business as usual," said a disappointed Bob Bixby, executive director of the Concord Coalition, a bipartisan budget watchdog organization. "For people that bragged about not doing business as usual, it is business as usual."

The biggest threat to the federal budget comes from Medicare spending. It's projected to explode in coming years as the first wave of Baby Boomers_ roughly 76 million Americans born between 1946 and 1964_ has already reached retirement age.

As they age, their medical needs will grow, and medical costs rise with technological advances. This dynamic will challenge the nation's federal spending as never before.

Republicans want to radically alter entitlement programs; Democrats want changes on the margins and favor new ways to fund it. Republicans demanded no new taxes, resisted President Barack Obama's attempts to restore a higher tax bracket for earners with taxable income above $250,000 a year and fought off attempts to scale back popular tax deductions such as mortgage interest.

Leaders of a bipartisan presidential commission last December proposed many such remedies in a report entitled "Moment of Truth." But Obama never fully endorsed the detailed urgings of the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, nor did congressional leaders of either party. The Bipartisan Policy Center offered a similarly detailed report that even called for a national sales tax tied to getting the nation's ratio of debt down to economic activity.

Both Bell and Bixby criticized President Obama for failing to think big and lead on tackling entitlement spending — the nation's inescapable fiscal challenge. Like his predecessor, George W. Bush, Obama formed a presidential commission to make recommendations that he then ignored. Now the new "deal" calls for another new committee to make more recommendations.

"He has not supported really important structural changes in Medicare, Medicaid or pensions at all during this entire process," said Bell, who was equally critical of Republicans for an unwillingness to change tax deductions or consider new taxes.

Addressing the nation Sunday night, Obama said he recognized a need for "modest" changes to Medicare and said there was still a chance that another bipartisan commission being established as part of the deal could yet bring reforms to entitlement spending. The commission, said to be 12 members of Congress from both parties, is to present by November new proposed spending cuts and perhaps changes to entitlement programs.

"In this stage everything will be on the table," Obama said, adding that Congress would rule on the committee's recommendations on an up or down vote.

Budget experts viewed this process skeptically.

"I think it's very unlikely that a special committee is going to make (serious bipartisan) recommendations right before an election year," Bixby said. He also feared that Congress will not allow steep automatic cuts to spending. "Democrats are never going to agree to major entitlement reform if revenues are off the table. The fact of the matter is, entitlement programs are very popular" with voters.

The most positive outcome in the deal to cut spending and raise the debt ceiling is that it would delay steep cuts awhile, so they wouldn't come within the next year, when the economic recovery is still so fragile.

"We also made sure these cuts wouldn't happen so abruptly that it would be a drag," Obama said.

ON THE WEB

Presidential commission report

Bipartisan Policy Center report

MORE FROM MCCLATCHY

This fact may not sit well: Americans are under-taxed

Voters set the stage for Washington's abysmal dysfunction

Economists: Now is wrong time for Congress to cut spending

McClatchy's probe into roots of financial crisis, a Pulitzer finalist

McClatchy Newspapers 2011

McClatchy Washington Bureau is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service