• Posted on Thursday, March 10, 2011
  • Bookmark and Share
  • email
  • |
  • print
  • |
  • rss

tool name

close
tool goes here

Rand Paul rips Energy Department on toilets, light bulbs

email this story print this story jump to comments

It may be a slow-burning issue, but light bulbs have been getting conservatives riled up for some time now. The surprise on Thursday was the problem with toilets.

Sen. Rand Paul, in a tussle with an Energy Department official Thursday, complained about what he described as burdensome, "busybody" regulations that were forcing him to buy a bad bowl.

"Frankly, my toilets don't work in my house. And I blame you and people like you who want to tell me what I can install in my house, what I can do. You restrict my choices," the Kentucky Republican said.

The issue on the table was a 2007 law requiring a phase-in of energy efficient bulbs. Paul and others are trying to repeal portions of the law, arguing that it restricts the American consumer.

At a Thursday hearing on the issue, Paul — a freshman Republican who shares a libertarian streak with his father, Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) — aimed his complaints at Kathleen Hogan, a deputy assistant at the Energy Department.

He began his remarks by asking Hogan if she was pro-choice. She replied that she was "pro-choice of bulbs."

"The point is that most members of your administration probably would be frank and would be up front to characterize themselves as being pro-choice for abortion," Paul said.

"But you're really anti-choice on every other consumer item that you've listed here."

The Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee was reviewing the Better Use of Light Bulbs Act (Bulb), a bill introduced by Sen. Michael Enzi (R-Wyo.) and Rep. Joe Barton (R-Texas) in the House.

Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) has her own version — and catchy name — the Light Bulb Freedom of Choice Act.

The measures take aim at a set of efficiency standards for light bulbs, attached to the 2007 energy bill signed by President George Bush.

The standard will eventually have the effect of phasing out traditional incandescent bulbs and replacing them with newer technology.

Critics say the law cost U.S. jobs and limited consumer choice.

"I can't buy the old light bulbs. That restricts my choice on buying," Paul said Thursday.

"My view is what you want is lighting?" Hogan said.

"I can't buy a toilet that works," Paul responded.

"I can help you find a toilet that works," Hogan said.

  • Bookmark and Share
  • email
  • |
  • print
  • |
  • rss

tool name

close
tool goes here
JOIN THE DISCUSSION

We welcome comments. To post one, you must sign in using either your McClatchyDC login or your login for Facebook, Twitter or Disqus. Just click the appropriate box below.

Please keep your comment civil, short and to the point. Obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. If you find a comment abusive or inappropriate, please flag it for the moderator by placing your cursor on the comment, then clicking the "flag" link that appears. Thanks for your participation.

Stay Connected

Sign up for email newsletters RSS
Follow us on your iPhone Follow us on your Android device
Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us using Google Currents

POLITICS & GOVERNMENT BLOG

Planet Washington

"Planet Washington" is a group blog by journalists in McClatchy's Washington Bureau. Send a story suggestion.