WikiLeaks: Assange extradition hearing will last until Friday

McClatchy-Tribune News ServiceFebruary 8, 2011 

LONDON — WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange continually avoided interview requests from Swedish authorities who wanted to question him about allegations that he sexually abused two women last summer, a British prosecutor said Tuesday.

Assange's apparent reluctance to be interviewed made him a flight risk and justified the move to arrest him, a London courtroom heard on the second day of a hearing to decide whether the 39-year-old Australian should be extradited from Britain to Sweden.

But Assange's lawyers said their client was difficult to reach not out of a desire to avoid interrogation but because he had essentially gone underground last September after his website leaked thousands of U.S. military documents and sparked official condemnation and threats of retaliation.

Prosecutors in Stockholm want Assange sent back to Sweden so they can investigate allegations by two women who accuse him of molestation and rape on separate occasions in August. The website founder, who surrendered to British police two months ago on a European arrest warrant, said the sex was consensual.

His defense team continued to argue Tuesday that Assange was the subject of a witch hunt by overzealous prosecutors captive to their own agendas or external pressure, especially from the U.S. out of anger over WikiLeaks' revelation of documents from the Pentagon and the U.S. State Department.

Geoffrey Robertson, Assange's lead attorney, accused Swedish authorities of leaking his client's name to the media and prejudicing public opinion against him when the allegations first surfaced.

Drawing laughter during an otherwise testy hearing, Robertson also faulted Swedish prosecutor Marianne Ny's office for not providing his client with documents in the case in a language he could understand, either in English or "in Australian." Outside the courtroom, Assange tried to turn the tables on his pursuers, criticizing Ny for not coming to London to be questioned at the hearing.

In other testimony, Sven-Erik Alhem, a former Swedish prosecutor called by the defense, said Assange should have been allowed to be questioned in Britain but that, if he were Assange, he would hurry back to Sweden to clear his name. Alhem also said that extraditing Assange from Sweden to the U.S. would be almost impossible, if only because it would create a "media storm."

The hearing, which had been scheduled to conclude Tuesday, is now due to wrap up on Friday. The judge's decision could take days.

McClatchy Washington Bureau is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service