Despite talk of cuts, Pentagon spending still going up

McClatchy NewspapersJanuary 6, 2011 

WASHINGTON — Amid growing calls for government spending cuts, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates unveiled Thursday a proposed five-year budget plan that would cut tens of thousands of troops from the Army and Marine Corps, eliminate two key weapons systems, and raise the cost of health insurance for some military retirees.

The proposal still foresees military spending growing by three percent next year, to $553 billion, not including spending on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

But the plan would trim about $78 billion from anticipated spending over the next five years, with even greater cuts coming after 2015, when the size of the Army and Marine Corps would shrink by 47,000 troops — primarily in response to the anticipated U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan at the end of 2014.

Gates didn't say how much he thinks the annual health care premium should rise for military retirees who are still of working age. But he noted that many military retirees take full time jobs after retirement, while keeping their military insurance, whose basic annual enrollment fee of $460 for a family hasn't changed since 1995.

He promised next year's budget will include "modest increases" to premiums for retirees of working age, with a goal of reducing the Pentagon's medical expenses by $7 billion over five years.

The budget Gates outlined would mark the 14th year in a row that Pentagon spending has increased. Pentagon spending has more than doubled in 10 years and is projected to rise to $620.2 billion by 2015; in fiscal year 2001, the defense budget was $291.2 billion. Adjusted for inflation, the Defense Department budget has risen 65 percent over the past decade.

Even that may not be enough for Republicans in Congress, however.

"I am concerned that this budget proposal for the Defense Department recommends less than one percent real growth in the Departments base budget over the next five years," said Arizona Sen. John McCain, the top Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, in a statement after Gates briefed him on the plan. "I look forward to receiving additional information to fully evaluate the impact of the administration's defense budget request on the missions and operations of our military forces."

Other analysts said that if the military budget were ever to be cut seriously, it would require the U.S. to rethink its military strategy.

"The administration continues say that the purpose of the U.S. military is not the defense of the United Sates but of the whole world," said Christopher Preble, the director of foreign policy studies at the CATO Institute, a libertarian policy organization in Washington. "I think it is worth asking whether the American taxpayer is willing to continue footing for the world's security."

Gone under the Gates proposal: a $14 billion amphibious Marine vehicle, the Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle, designed by General Dynamics Corp., and a ground-launched missile produced by Raytheon Co. that was part of a future combat system for the Army.

In addition, Gates proposed placing the Marine variant of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, produced by Lockheed Martin, on a two-year probation, saying that Lockheed Martin has only that long to correct problems in what's turned into the Pentagon's costliest weapons program.

But those specific savings would be used for other programs.

The Air Force budget includes $34 billion for advanced drone aircraft, improved radar on existing F-15 fighter jets and helping develop a new long-range nuclear bomber.

The Army would spend the $24 billion savings from the elimination of Raytheon's so-called non-line of sight missile launch system on suicide prevention programs and to modernize three key military vehicles — the Abrams tank, the Bradley Fighting Vehicles and the Stryker armored fighting vehicle.

Gates' proposal also foresees a range of cuts to the Navy that would be used to finance $35 billion in spending on the development of electronic equipment to protect shipboard radar, refurbish Marine Corps equipment used in Iraq and Afghanistan and purchase additional ships, including a destroyer, an ocean surveillance vessel and fleet oilers.

Under Gates' proposal, the Army would shrink by 27,000 starting in fiscal year 2015; there are currently 569,000 soldiers. Between 15,000 and 20,000 Marines would be cut from the current complement of 202,000.

Despite those cuts, both the Army and Marine Corps would be larger than they were when Gates assumed his Pentagon post four years ago under President George W. Bush.

"These projected reductions are based on an assumption that America's ground combat commitment in Afghanistan would be significantly reduced by the end of 2014 in accordance with the president's strategy," Gates said.

Gates said his proposed budget is the "minimum level of defense spending that is necessary."

Gates made his announcement just one day after Republicans took control of the House of Representatives and could become a point of contention between rival Republican factions. While McCain said he's concerned that the budget proposal is too little, the No. 2 Republican in the House of Representatives, Virginia's Rep. Eric Cantor, said he welcomes Gates' proposals.

Gates briefed top defense legislators on Capitol Hill Thursday about his proposed budget, including Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., the chairman of the Senate Armed Services committee, and McCain. The department is expected to present its full five-year budget plan to Congress early next month.

(William Douglas contributed to this article.)


Army opens probe of its role in WikiLeaks security breach

Why will it take so long to lift 'don't ask, don't tell'?

Afghanistan report finds progress 'fragile,' offers few details

Follow McClatchy on Twitter.

McClatchy Newspapers 2010

McClatchy Washington Bureau is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service