Idaho power companies move to slow alternative energy

Idaho StatesmanDecember 19, 2010 

BOISE, Idaho — In the midst of an energy transition not seen since Idaho Power built its Hells Canyon dams in the 1950s and ’60s, Idaho’s new energy economy is evolving faster than the state’s infrastructure can handle it.

But it still is not happening fast enough for entrepreneurs who are ready to risk their capital to build new wind, solar, geothermal and anaerobic digester power plants.

As late as 2006, Idaho Power Co. had just 80 megawatts of wind power in its system. Today, the utility has 472 megawatts of wind generation expected to be online by the end of the year. Idaho Power officials expect to have 1,100 megawatts of wind energy soon. That’s nearly as much power as can be produced from its Hells Canyon dams, although wind can’t produce a consistent flow of power at that level.

Idaho Power’s efforts to reduce usage during peak times and to build a business around energy efficiency come at a time when Idaho’s Republican governor campaigned for re-election by touting solar power — just one sign of the tectonic shift that the new energy age is bringing.

“We hope to lead some of that cultural change,” said Ric Gale, Idaho Power’s vice president of corporate responsibility, a new position.

Idaho Power also has smaller but growing blocks of geothermal and biofuel power coming online and has one solar developer planning a major power plant near Mountain Home. These new sources of power — along with the company’s Langley Gulch natural gas plant under construction near New Plymouth — are shifting the utility away from coal, which was how the company handled growth when demand outgrew its hydroelectric plants in the 1980s.

Wind, solar and energy-efficiency programs are now the mainstream.

“We really shouldn’t call it alternative energy anymore,” said John Freemuth, a Boise State University public policy professor.

The change isn’t coming easy. Idaho Power Co., Avista Utilities and PacifiCorp have filed a petition with the Idaho Public Utilities Commission that they hope will curtail wind projects and make the regulatory system catch up to the changing energy markets.

Wind developers, dairy farmers and contractors who produce power from municipal waste worry the petition will make it harder for them to sell the power they produce.


In 1978, Congress passed the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act, known as PURPA, to promote renewable energy development to replace fossil fuels. The law requires utilities to buy electricity from small producers at a rate based on what it would cost to produce that power at a new plant.

Part of the goal was to boost smaller producers. But the utilities say the bulk of wind projects today are large-scale wind farms often installed by huge corporations, such as the General Electric-backed facility under construction near Bliss.

Some energy developers keep their projects a mile apart so they qualify for PURPA’s small-producer rate, which can be higher than what the power would fetch on the open market.

The utilities want the Public Utilities Commission to drastically reduce — down to 100 kilowatts — the amount the companies are required to purchase at the set rate. They argue that they have so many wind projects coming on line that they could end up having more power than they can use or sell at some times of the year.

Idaho Power officials hope the petition will help the utilities and the commission develop a better system for everyone.

“It gives most parties the incentive to come up with creative solutions to these problems,” said Donovan Walker, Idaho Power senior counsel.

Some wind generators have negotiated a comparable rate with Idaho Power that works for both sides. Idaho Power wants that to be the norm.

“Any time I’ve worked with Idaho Power, it’s been cordial, productive and pleasant,” said Glenn Ikemoto, a California-based wind developer who has 180 megawatts of wind power under contract in Idaho.

The Northwest and Intermountain Power Producers Coalition said the current system has brought rural development to Idaho — and the utilities’ proposal threatens to slow or halt it. The system has not increased costs for Idaho Power customers, the group says.

“The policy in place right now is successful in my view,” said Peter Richardson, a Boise attorney who represents the coalition.

Read the full story at

McClatchy Washington Bureau is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service