Many GOP Senate candidates doubt climate science

McClatchy NewspapersOctober 28, 2010 

WASHINGTON — Scientists say evidence from around the globe clearly shows that human activity is changing the climate. Conservative Republican candidates in U.S. Senate races nationwide, however, don't agree.

It's a point that scores well with tea party activists, but contradicts what NASA, the National Academy of Sciences and other prominent science organizations have been telling readers on their websites.

Victories by these candidates Tuesday could make Senate action on reducing emissions of greenhouse gases — already stalled — even more unlikely to restart next year. Still, even with the complex energy and climate bill looking dead, Republicans have used it — especially the cap-and-trade part about reducing emissions — to bash Democrats. In doing so, they've also cultivated uncertainty about climate change.

Beyond that, some Republican candidates also are denying that manmade climate change is real.

John Raese, the Republican candidate in West Virginia, put it bluntly in a debate this month when he spoke of the "myth of global warming and the other myth that man is causing global warming."

Some others:

  • Florida: Republican Marco Rubio questions whether global warming is manmade.
  • Missouri: Republican Roy Blunt, in a recent debate, said: "I think climate change is real. I don't know how much of it is being instigated by people."
  • Alaska: Republican write-in candidate and incumbent Sen. Lisa Murkowski, in debate Wednesday, said climate change is "one of the tough issues before us" that must be addressed with emissions reductions, but that she opposed the cap-and-trade bill the Senate was considering until this summer.

    Tea party Republican Joe Miller, who beat her in the primary, doesn't think global warming is real. "The science supporting manmade climate change is inconclusive," Miller says on his website.

  • Kentucky: Republican candidate Rand Paul, when asked whether human activity was making the planet warmer, replied: "I think it's complicated, first of all. And I think anyone who makes an absolute conclusion is probably overstating their conclusion."
  • California: Republican Carly Fiorina was asked at a meeting with Sacramento Bee reporters in March, "Do you believe in man-made climate change?" She replied: "I don't know. I don't know. But I think we should have the courage always to examine the science."

Some Democrats fight back by citing arguments from scientists.

"The science is overwhelming," said Rep. Baron Hill, D-Ind., an House Energy and Commerce Committee member in a close race in a conservative district. "There is no question about that."

"There is compelling, comprehensive, and consistent objective evidence that humans are changing the climate in ways that threaten our societies and the ecosystems on which we depend," 255 scientists who are members of the National Academy of Sciences wrote in May.

Scott Denning, a professor in the Department of Atmospheric Sciences at Colorado State University, said it's been about 150 years since scientists first figured out that accumulating carbon dioxide in the atmosphere would trap heat and emit it back to Earth.

"This is a very well understood scientific phenomenon," he said.

The amount of extra carbon dioxide in the atmosphere roughly matches with the amount released from fossil fuels. An analysis of the makeup of the carbon atoms also pegs the extra gas to fossil fuels, Denning said.

NASA scientists say they're ruled out natural causes for the current warming, such as changes in sun activity. Global warming, NASA says, is "primarily due to the greenhouse gases released by people burning fossil fuels."

Most congressional campaigns haven't spent much time on climate change, except where Republicans have brought up their objections to the cap-and-trade legislation.

"American campaigns are not educational," said Ross Baker, a professor of political science at Rutgers University. "They're more designed for people to express frustration in years like this . . . and subtleties are driven out of the market."

Added Nathan Gonzales, the political editor of the Rothenberg Political Report, a nonpartisan group that tracks congressional campaigns: "Cap and trade has come to be a symbol of government intervention. It's not necessarily about specific policies."

A recent Pew Research Center poll showed that 59 percent of adults say there's solid evidence that Earth's average temperature has increased in the past few decades, and 34 percent of those polled said the warming is mostly because of burning fossil fuels. Those numbers are down dramatically from 2006, when 79 percent said there was evidence of global warming and 50 percent said it was mostly caused by human activity.

Pew said that changing views among Republicans and independents accounts for the drop in numbers. The poll showed that 70 percent of those polled who agreed with the tea party movement didn't think there's solid evidence that the Earth is warming.

The poll also showed that 44 percent thought scientists agree the Earth is warming because of human activity, and an identical 44 percent thought they don't agree.

Another independent and nonpartisan poll, by the Opinion Research Corp., showed that about 6 in 10 Americans think climate change is "already a big problem and we should be leading the world in solutions," while about 1 in 4 thought global warming "may or may not be happening" and "we should let other countries act first while the science sorts itself out."

The breakdown for those who supported taking the lead on climate change solutions was 27 percent of Tea Party supporters, 62 percent of independents, 39 percent of Republicans and 82 percent of Democrats.

(Erika Bolstad, Lesley Clark, Rob Hotakainen and David Goldstein in Washington and Jack Chang of The Sacramento Bee, Steve Kraske of The Kansas City Star, and Bill Estep of The Lexington Herald-Leader contributed to this article.)

ON THE WEB

A guide for all ages: "Climate Literacy: The Essential Principles of Climate Science"

NASA

National Academy of Sciences

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

National Center for Atmospheric Research

MORE FROM MCCLATCHY

Report: Halliburton knew BP well's cement likely unstable

Iraqis gather plant samples to replace destroyed collection

Oil refiners add $1.5 million more to climate change rollback initiative

NOAA: Warming Arctic unlikely to return to how it was

Check out McClatchy's politics blog: Planet Washington

McClatchy Newspapers 2010

McClatchy Washington Bureau is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service