• Posted on Wednesday, October 13, 2010
  • Bookmark and Share
  • email
  • |
  • print
  • |
  • rss

tool name

close
tool goes here

How 'none of the above' could help Harry Reid win

email this story print this story jump to comments

More on this Story

LAS VEGAS — Those Nevadans fed up with Washington, as most voters in this state appear to be, have a unique option: They can vote for "none of these candidates."

Yet on Nov. 2, that protest vote could help re-elect the consummate Washington insider, struggling Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, a Democrat, since a vote for no one is a vote that Reid's challengers won't get.

"It helps him quite a bit," said David Damore, associate professor of political science at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas.

Reid is seeking his fifth term, but polls have shown his support in a 40 percent to 47 percent range for months. He's in trouble because of his role as Washington's most powerful Senate Democrat in championing big government programs.

However, his main opponent, Republican Sharron Angle, an upset winner of the June GOP primary, isn't catching fire either. Angle's an outspoken tea party supporter, and independents and moderate Republicans often find her "a walking set of controversies," as described by Jennifer Duffy, the Senate analyst for the nonpartisan Cook Political Report.

Angle and Reid have been in a virtual tie for weeks, even as one message has dominated the voters' mood.

"In a race like this, people want to show they're fed up with the status quo," Damore said. Though the ballot includes six other independents and third-party candidates, polls suggest that many frustrated voters will turn to the none-of-the-above option.

A statewide CNN/Time/Opinion Research poll taken Oct. 1 to 5 found the just-say-no option polling 10 percent among likely voters. Angle got 42 percent; Reid 40 percent. Among a broader sample of registered voters, none-of-the-above got 15 percent. (Error margins were 3.5 percentage points for likely voters, and 2.5 percentage points for the broader sample.)

Nevada's "none of these candidates" option, adopted in 1975, grew out of efforts after the Watergate scandals to combat voter apathy. If the none-option were to win, the next highest vote-getter would be declared the winner.

That actually happened in 1976, when "none of these" got 16,097 votes in a Republican congressional primary, far more than the two leading candidates.

It rarely makes much difference — though analysts saw it as a big help to Reid in 1998. He won re-election that year by 428 votes — and "none of these candidates" got 8,125.

ON THE WEB

Reid-Angle polls

1998 Nevada U.S. Senate election results

CNN/Time/Opinion Research poll

Cook Political Report Senate race ratings

Larry Sabato's Crystal Ball

MORE FROM MCCLATCHY

Tidal wave of outside money swamping 2010 elections

Supreme Court rolls back limits on corporate campaign spending

Support for Congress sapped by inaction, partisan feuding

For more McClatchy politics coverage visit Planet Washington

McClatchy Newspapers 2010
  • Bookmark and Share
  • email
  • |
  • print
  • |
  • rss

tool name

close
tool goes here
JOIN THE DISCUSSION

We welcome comments. To post one, you must sign in using either your McClatchyDC login or your login for Facebook, Twitter or Disqus. Just click the appropriate box below.

Please keep your comment civil, short and to the point. Obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. If you find a comment abusive or inappropriate, please flag it for the moderator by placing your cursor on the comment, then clicking the "flag" link that appears. Thanks for your participation.

Stay Connected

Sign up for email newsletters RSS
Follow us on your iPhone Follow us on your Android device
Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us using Google Currents

POLITICS & GOVERNMENT BLOG

Planet Washington

"Planet Washington" is a group blog by journalists in McClatchy's Washington Bureau. Send a story suggestion.