• Posted on Friday, September 10, 2010
  • Bookmark and Share
  • email
  • |
  • print
  • |
  • rss

tool name

close
tool goes here

Commentary: Obama following Bush playbook on renditions

email this story print this story jump to comments

It is one of the most shameful tactics in the war on terrorism.

The CIA calls it "extraordinary rendition" — intelligence-speak for seizing suspects and either interrogating them in secret prisons in Afghanistan and elsewhere, or turning them over to allies to extract information. That too often meant mistreatment, even torture.

America needs a thorough cleansing from this travesty, but that appears less and less likely to happen. In a 6-5 ruling on Wednesday, the federal appeals court based in San Francisco refused to let five former rendition prisoners even have their day in court. The court accepted the Obama administration's claim that if the lawsuit proceeded any further, it would expose "state secrets."

The five men sued Jeppesen Dataplan Inc., accusing the San Jose-based Boeing subsidiary of arranging flights for the rendition program and thus being complicit in the torture they say they endured. To read just the summaries of the allegations is to be horrified anew. The lead plaintiff, Binyam Mohamed, an Ethiopian who was also a legal British resident, said the CIA handed him over to Moroccan security agents who broke his bones, sliced his body with a scalpel and poured "hot stinging liquid" in the open wounds.

To his credit, President Barack Obama has turned the page on many of President George W. Bush's mistakes and excesses. To his disgrace, Obama is reading from the same book on renditions. While the administration promises that suspects are no longer tortured, we do know that rendition, in some form, persists. And Obama, like Bush, wants to keep hidden what atrocities were done to supposedly protect us.

It's unclear exactly what secrets are at stake. The broad outlines of the program have already been disclosed, largely through the hard work of human rights lawyers and investigative reporters. Administration officials want us to take them at their word that further disclosures would damage national security, just as the majority on the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals did.

To read the complete editorial, visit www.sacbee.com.

  • Bookmark and Share
  • email
  • |
  • print
  • |
  • rss

tool name

close
tool goes here
JOIN THE DISCUSSION

We welcome comments. To post one, you must sign in using either your McClatchyDC login or your login for Facebook, Twitter or Disqus. Just click the appropriate box below.

Please keep your comment civil, short and to the point. Obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. If you find a comment abusive or inappropriate, please flag it for the moderator by placing your cursor on the comment, then clicking the "flag" link that appears. Thanks for your participation.

Stay Connected

Sign up for email newsletters RSS
Follow us on your iPhone Follow us on your Android device
Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us using Google Currents

FEATURED COLUMNIST

leonard pitts jr.

Miami Herald columnist Leonard Pitts Jr. won the Pulitzer Prize for commentary in 2004. He is the author of the Novel, Before I Forget. Read his latest commentary here.

COMMENTARY AROUND MCCLATCHY

FEATURED COLUMNIST

joe galloway

McClatchy's veteran war correspondent, Joseph L. Galloway, retired in January 2010 after half a century in the newspaper business. Read his farewell column, and an archive of his take-no-prisoners commentary. Here's one of his most-requested columns, "Fridays at the Pentagon."