• Posted on Thursday, September 2, 2010
  • Bookmark and Share
  • email
  • |
  • print
  • |
  • rss

tool name

close
tool goes here

Commentary: The pricetag on U.S. elections

email this story print this story jump to comments

As a visitor from Germany, I find it astonishing that elections in this country can be decided by who is able to buy the most advertising time out of his own pocket. Seeing is believing, though. Florida's gubernatorial and U.S. Senate primary races leave the impression that public offices come with a price tag.

Experience? Brains? A good political idea? That is so yesterday. Today, it's all about money. Billionaire Jeff Greene's loss in the Democratic primary for the U.S. Senate showed that money isn't always the determining factor, but it sure helped Rick Scott in his victorious race for the GOP nomination for governor.

In Germany, by contrast, campaign spending is strictly regulated and ad time is allocated. Germany has some 15 parties running in every federal and statewide election -- although only five or six have a serious chance of winning seats in the various parliaments.

Before every general election, one can watch sometimes puzzling commercials by the Animal Protection Party, the spiritual Purple Party or the Family Party. The repetition of the big parties' ads is limited without making it impossible for them to get their messages across.

Television time is allocated on the basis of success in former elections. It is not purely socialist equality, but instead fathoming the interest of the public yet still giving new parties a chance to emerge.

Thus, it is impossible for big money candidates to use the overwhelming power of TV ads and rise out of nowhere solely on the basis of the candidate's wealth.

This regulation may make it harder for charismatic leaders like John F. Kennedy or Ronald Reagan to gain power in a quick ascent, but political talk shows still make it possible for the eloquent candidate to shine. The career path within the party also prevents politicians from catapulting into public office with no idea what politics are about. Better to have a bureaucrat with background and experience in the office than a polished know-nothing.

In Germany, election campaigns are also indirectly funded by the government. Parties receive a yearly sum, which makes up to 20 to 40 percent of their capital. Again, the success in former and upcoming elections is crucial in determining how much money a party will receive.

To read the complete column, visit www.miamiherald.com.

  • Bookmark and Share
  • email
  • |
  • print
  • |
  • rss

tool name

close
tool goes here
JOIN THE DISCUSSION

We welcome comments. To post one, you must sign in using either your McClatchyDC login or your login for Facebook, Twitter or Disqus. Just click the appropriate box below.

Please keep your comment civil, short and to the point. Obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. If you find a comment abusive or inappropriate, please flag it for the moderator by placing your cursor on the comment, then clicking the "flag" link that appears. Thanks for your participation.

Stay Connected

Sign up for email newsletters RSS
Follow us on your iPhone Follow us on your Android device
Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us using Google Currents

FEATURED COLUMNIST

leonard pitts jr.

Miami Herald columnist Leonard Pitts Jr. won the Pulitzer Prize for commentary in 2004. He is the author of the Novel, Before I Forget. Read his latest commentary here.

COMMENTARY AROUND MCCLATCHY

FEATURED COLUMNIST

joe galloway

McClatchy's veteran war correspondent, Joseph L. Galloway, retired in January 2010 after half a century in the newspaper business. Read his farewell column, and an archive of his take-no-prisoners commentary. Here's one of his most-requested columns, "Fridays at the Pentagon."