Commentary: 'Ground Zero' mosque and religious liberty

The (Raleigh) News & ObserverAugust 5, 2010 

It's the 9/11 of emotional issues. The proposal to build a mosque near the Ground Zero site in lower Manhattan has understandably angered many people — and not a few politicians — in New York and around the nation.

The issues involved are deeply felt and firmly entrenched in the horrors of Sept. 11, 2001, when Islamic extremists dispatched by Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda murdered nearly 3,000 people at the World Trade Center, in Pennsylvania and at the Pentagon.

As one woman told Newsday this week, "We are not bigots ... I know that not all Muslims are terrorists, but all these terrorists were Muslims and I cannot forget that." But also entitled to consideration are claims that the mosque project's backers should not be blocked from their stated goals of encouraging moderate Islam and of bridging religious divides.

There is one point, however, that should not be subject to dispute. That is the use of governmental power to block a religious organization from putting up a worship center on land it owns (or is buying) because of opposition to the particular faith involved.

Such an effort goes directly counter to our concept of religious liberty. And yet using government power to block the mosque seems to be just what some people want various committees in New York City — from zoning boards to the Landmarks Preservation Commission — to do.

To read the complete editorial, visit

McClatchy Washington Bureau is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service