Asbestos' U.S. legacy may be half-million deaths

International Consortium of Investigative JournalistsJuly 21, 2010 

WASHINGTON — The first sign of trouble came as Bill Rogers was mowing his lawn one January morning in 2007. "As I would go back and forth with the mower, I would run out of air," said Rogers, 67, of Palm Bay, Fla.

Rogers went to the doctor and learned that his right lung was full of fluid. Three days later he was diagnosed with mesothelioma, a lethal tumor that occurs in the lining of the chest or the abdomen and almost always is associated with asbestos exposure. "I'd heard of it, but I didn't really know what it was," he said. "They told me it's not a good cancer to get."

That Rogers is alive more than three years after his diagnosis is something of a miracle. To him, the source of his illness is clear: He worked on or around asbestos-containing automobile brakes, mostly at General Motors dealerships, for 44 years. He and his co-workers had used compressed-air hoses to clean out brake drums, where debris from worn asbestos brake shoes would collect, and had filed and sanded the shoes when installing new brakes.

Although he routinely wore a respirator while sanding plastic filler during bodywork, he said, no one ever told him he needed one for brake work. He sued GM, Ford, Chrysler and seven manufacturers and suppliers of brakes and clutches in 2008 and settled with the last of them in 2009.

Rogers is among hundreds of former mechanics and body shop employees known to have developed mesothelioma after working on brakes, clutches and gaskets, which contained the most common form of the mineral — chrysotile, or white, asbestos — well into the 1990s. Many have sued auto manufacturers and parts makers, litigation that reflects the unceasing burden of asbestos disease in the United States.

Asbestos has decimated the ranks of miners, millers, factory workers, insulators and shipyard workers, some of whom began filing workers' compensation claims as far back as the 1930s. The modern era of asbestos lawsuits began in the 1970s with claims from these same groups of workers. Many had taken in massive doses of fiber and died of diseases such as asbestosis, which can develop within a decade of initial exposure. Some of the cases involved mixtures of amosite, or brown, asbestos, which is no longer used, and chrysotile.

In court now, aside from a few heavily exposed claimants, are mechanics, teachers from asbestos-filled schools and the wives and children of workers who brought home asbestos on their clothing. Most of these people had relatively light exposures and developed mesothelioma, a disease that can take 30, 40 or even 50 years to appear.

"The people who were exposed to a ton of asbestos are dead. They've all been killed off by this stuff," said lawyer Jonathan Ruckdeschel, who's handled nearly 200 mesothelioma cases, including Rogers'. "What we're seeing now are people, like Bill Rogers, who are getting mesothelioma, often without any other associated asbestos disease."

Although asbestos use in the U.S. plummeted from a peak of 885,000 tons in 1973 to 1,609 tons in 2008, the nation's epidemic is far from over. As many as 10,000 Americans still die of asbestos-related diseases each year; one expert estimates that 300,000 or so will die within the next three decades.

Once broadly utilized by U.S. industry — not only in brakes but also in construction, insulation and shipbuilding — asbestos was heralded for its remarkable resistance to fire and heat. Strong and inexpensive, the fibrous mineral acquired a darker reputation in the 1960s as its health effects became widely known.

Internal documents showing corporate knowledge of the mineral's carcinogenic properties began to surface, and by 1981 more than 200 companies and insurers had been sued. The following year, the nation's biggest maker of asbestos products — Johns Manville Corp. — filed for bankruptcy protection in an effort to hold off the tide of litigation.

From the early 1970s through 2002, more than 730,000 people filed asbestos claims in the U.S., resulting in costs to the industry of about $70 billion, according to a 2005 study by the RAND Corp., a research center. About $49 billion of that went to victims and their lawyers, and the remainder toward other legal costs.

Asbestos use has largely moved overseas, fueled by an aggressive industry campaign that's pushed up consumption in fast-growing countries such as China, Brazil and India. Banned or restricted in 52 countries, asbestos products can still be sold in the U.S. but rarely are, and are largely limited to auto and aircraft brakes and gaskets. China, the world's leading consumer, used 690,000 tons of asbestos in 2007.

The decline in usage in the U.S., however, has done little for those who've already been exposed and perhaps for those who continue to be.

Long latency periods for mesothelioma and lung cancer ensure that there'll be victims for years to come, health experts say. Last year, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported that 18,068 Americans died of mesothelioma from 1999 through 2005, with the annual toll edging toward 3,000. Another 1,500 or so die each year of asbestosis, a rate that's apparently plateaued, according to the CDC. The number of asbestos-related lung cancer deaths is harder to pin down, given the ubiquity of smoking, but it could be as high as 8,000 per year.

Dr. Richard Lemen, a former assistant U.S. surgeon general who consults for plaintiffs in asbestos cases, has cited estimates of 189,000 to 231,000 worker deaths from all asbestos-related diseases from 1980 to 2007. "Another 270,000 to 330,000 deaths are expected to occur over the next 30 years," he told a Senate committee in 2007.

If Lemen's figures are correct, that would put the death toll from America's asbestos age at a half-million people. In its 2005 study, RAND similarly projected 432,465 asbestos-related cancer deaths from 1965 through 2029; this number excludes fatal cases of asbestosis.

The Environmental Protection Agency tried to ban asbestos in 1989 but was stopped by an industry lawsuit. Legislation to impose a ban has failed to pass since Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash, introduced it in 2002.

Murray has pointed out that imported asbestos brakes are still being sold for older vehicles, putting professional mechanics and weekend tinkerers at risk, and that asbestos can be found in a variety of items.

Laboratory tests commissioned by the Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization, a victims' advocacy group, have revealed the presence of asbestos in products as diverse as U.S.-made window glazing and a toy fingerprinting kit made in China. The organization's CEO, Linda Reinstein, said she was hopeful that proposed revisions to the notoriously weak Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976 would close loopholes that allowed the 1989 ban to be overturned.

Experts say that the current U.S. workplace standard for asbestos — 0.1 fiber per cubic centimeter of air, which the Occupational Safety and Health Administration adopted in 1994 — still allows a worker to inhale more than 1 million fibers over the course of a day. The CDC's National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health estimates that exposures at this level will produce five lung cancer deaths and two asbestosis deaths for every 1,000 workers over a lifetime. Federal officials think that 1.3 million workers in general industry and construction and 45,000 miners are still exposed to asbestos in the U.S.

Mindful of their potential liability on brake linings, GM, Ford and Chrysler have fought the current round of mesothelioma lawsuits with vigor.

Court records show that the three have paid nearly $43 million since 2001 to scientific experts at two consulting firms — ChemRisk and Exponent — who've testified that the amounts of asbestos fibers released from handling brake shoes (used in older drum brakes) and pads (used in newer disc brakes) either were harmless or in insufficient quantities to cause disease.

Several of these experts — most notably Dennis Paustenbach, the president of ChemRisk and a former vice president of Exponent — have published papers in peer-reviewed journals concluding that brake mechanics are not at increased risk of developing mesothelioma or lung cancer.

The papers are offered as evidence by defendants seeking to avoid financial blows such as the $15 million verdict that a Baltimore jury returned against Ford on April 28.

In that case, Joan Dixon, 68, died of mesothelioma after washing her husband's asbestos-coated work clothes for 14 years. Her husband, Bernard, had done part-time brake work in a garage that specialized in Ford vehicles. A ChemRisk toxicologist, Brent Finley, was a defense expert in the case. A Ford spokeswoman declined to comment on the verdict.

In an unrelated amicus brief filed with the Michigan Supreme Court in 2007, more than 50 physicians and scientists took aim at industry consultants retained in the brake litigation.

"It is in no way surprising that the experts and papers financed by these manufacturers conclude that asbestos in brakes can never cause mesothelioma," the brief says.

The brief contends that Paustenbach's work on asbestos follows a "business model" under which he publishes exculpatory papers on compounds — such as hexavalent chromium, the groundwater pollutant at the center of the 1990s Erin Brockovich case in California — that are the subject of lawsuits. Paustenbach strongly denies the charge. Records show that the big three automakers paid ChemRisk almost $12 million from 2001 to 2009.

In an e-mail, Paustenbach said he was an impartial scientist and pointed to studies on radiation and an industrial chemical in which he delivered bad news to his funders. "Our thorough and independent research and analysis stand on their own merits," he wrote of his work on asbestos, "and there has been no specific credible challenge to the conclusions we drew."

A scientist with Exponent, which received $31 million from the three automakers, agreed with Paustenbach. Epidemiological studies "have shown quite convincingly that neither lung cancer nor mesothelioma risks are increased among workers engaged in automotive, including brake, repair," Dr. Suresh Moolgavkar wrote in a statement.

Ford said in a statement that the "vast majority of money" it had spent on consultants such as ChemRisk "is directly related to expert costs incurred in defending the company against meritless lawsuits ... and is not related to the funding of scientific studies." A spokesman for Chrysler declined to comment; a GM spokesman didn't respond to requests for comment.

Warnings about asbestos in brakes go back decades and remain in effect.

In 1948, a newsletter from the National Safety Council, a public service organization, cautioned, "Asbestos used in the formulation of brake lining is a potentially harmful compound." A bulletin the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health issued in 1975 warned that brake work could produce "significant exposures" to asbestos and recommended that employers use dust-control measures. Nearly 1 million workers were at risk, the institute said. It held meetings on the subject in 1975 and 1976; among those present were representatives of Ford, GM and Johns Manville, then the nation's biggest manufacturer of asbestos products.

The message never filtered down to people such as Bill Rogers, however.

"There were no warning labels on the (brake shoe) boxes that said it was harmful to you," he said. "Nobody ever seemed to talk about it."

Lawyer Gary DiMuzio, who's represented about 200 mesothelioma victims, said automakers and brake lining manufacturers didn't give mechanics and vehicle owners "a realistic appraisal of the risks they were facing and how to minimize those risks."

Techniques to limit asbestos exposure — ventilation, the use of water to curb dust — were "widely discussed in the 1930s," DiMuzio said. "It wasn't rocket science. This was basic engineering, and they just didn't want to do it." No warnings appeared on brake products until well into the 1970s, he adds, "and those warnings were inadequate."

As mesothelioma sufferers go, Rogers is doing well. The tumor appears to be contained. Still, he said, "The thought of having cancer and knowing there's no cure for it works on your mind."

(This story is part of "Dangers in the Dust," a joint investigation by the BBC's International News Services and the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists. The consortium is a collaboration of some of the world's top investigative reporters. Launched in 1997 as a project of The Center for Public Integrity, the consortium globally extends the center's style of watchdog journalism, working with 100 journalists in 50 countries to produce long-term, transnational investigations.)

ON THE WEB

Read more on the investigation at PublicIntegrity.org and the BBC.

MORE FROM MCCLATCHY

Follow Afghanistan developments at McClatchy'sCheckpoint Kabul

Follow China developments at McClatchy's China Rises

Check out McClatchy's new blog about Mexico, Mexico Unmasked

McClatchy Newspapers 2010

McClatchy Washington Bureau is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service