McChrystal recall culminates months of tensions with White House

McClatchy NewspapersJune 22, 2010 

WASHINGTON — The White House decision to order Afghanistan commander Army Gen. Stanley McChrystal on Tuesday to leave a flailing war and answer to President Barack Obama about comments he and aides made in a forthcoming magazine article culminates months of tension between the military and political leadership over how to conduct the war and who's in charge.

The friction between the military leadership and the Obama administration began almost immediately after the president took the office last year and has grown as the situation in Afghanistan has deteriorated.

It reached its apex in December, when Obama gave an address at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, N.Y., and set a date — July 2011 — for American troops to start withdrawing, which goes against the principles of counterinsurgency that guided the military in the latter part of the Iraq war.

Military commanders said privately that the White House didn't understand war; White House officials said the military didn't understand political realities.

Political leaders have intimated for months that the Pentagon has engaged in leaks and backroom insubordination. Military leaders have charged that the Obama administration is committed to getting out of Afghanistan, not winning.

Where the military has called for leaving behind a stable Afghanistan, civilian leaders have said they want only to “disrupt, defeat and dismantle” al Qaida.

In the Rolling Stone magazine article, scheduled for release Friday, a McChrystal aide ridicules Vice President Joe Biden — who'd opposed the troop "surge" for Afghanistan —and another aide described Richard Holbrooke, the U.S. special envoy for Afghanistan and Pakistan, as a “wounded animal.”

McChrystal is quoted saying that the U.S. ambassador in Kabul, Karl Eikenberry, who wrote an e-mail opposing sending the additional troops, “covers his flank for the history books.” A McChrystal aide calls National Security Adviser Jim Jones, a retired Marine general, a “clown." Only Secretary of State Hillary Clinton gets good reviews from McChrystal’s staff.

Aides to McChrystal have made the same complaints privately for months. Indeed, in a statement Tuesday about the article McChrystal didn't question the accuracy of the story but instead offered his “sincerest apology.”

“It was a mistake reflecting poor judgment and should never have happened. Throughout my career, I have lived by the principles of personal honor and professional integrity. What is reflected in this article falls far short of that standard,” McChrystal said in the statement.

“I have enormous respect and admiration for President Obama and his national security team, and for the civilian leaders and troops fighting this war, and I remain committed to ensuring its successful outcome.”

One of McChrystal’s key aides, civilian public affairs adviser Duncan Boothby, resigned Tuesday. He set up and sat in on many of the Rolling Stone interviews.

McChrystal spoke to Secretary of Defense Robert Gates and Navy Adm. Michael Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, for about 10 minutes each last night. Mullen expressed "deep disappointment" in the article, according to Pentagon spokesman Navy Capt. John Kirby.

It was Gates who told McChrystal to return to Washington, where on Wednesday he will meet first with Gates and then later with Obama.

According to Pentagon officials, Rolling Stone sent excerpts of the article to McChrystal for fact checking, but it was unclear that McChrystal himself read the story.

But the general has a history of making candid statements that draw the ire of the administration. Most notably, during a speech in London last fall, McChrystal, 55, publicly refused to embrace calls by Biden to scale down U.S. goals from creating a stable state and eliminating the Taliban threat to only defeating al Qaida.

He called Biden's approach "shortsighted"; Obama brought him onto Air Force I and chastised him for the comments afterward.

But McChrystal continued to make comments that cast Afghan policy in a harsh light. In February, McChrystal promised that he would stand up an Afghan local government that would govern Marjah after a U.S. offensive there. In May, as the situation in Marjah deteriorated, he called the situation in surrounding Helmand province "a bleeding ulcer," a comment that was reported by McClatchy.

At the Pentagon, commanders began speculating over McChrystal’s possible replacement, conceding that the bench is short. At the top of the list is Marine Gen. James Mattis, the commander of the U.S. Joint Forces Command, who was just passed over to replace Gen. James Conway as the next Marine Corps commandant.

Tensions began months into the new administration when top defense officials came to Obama and recommended that he fire then-Afghanistan commander Army Gen. David McKiernan and replace him with McChrystal. The military also said it needed 21,500 more troops, and Obama agreed. Pentagon officials have told McClatchy that Obama felt cornered and responsible for a war that he didn't understand.

Upon becoming commander, McChrystal conducted a 90-day review and concluded that he needed as many as 80,000 more troops. The administration, which had once said that the commander would get what he needed, instead publicly squabbled for months before agreeing to send another 30,000 troops, 50,000 short of the request.

In addition, the Obama administration announced that the commander had until December — four months after the completion of the troop surge — to show progress. By July 2011, the start of the 2012 political cycle, a withdrawal would begin.

The Pentagon tried to adjust its position to the White House timetable. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, who'd opposed timelines in a counterinsurgency when he served under the George W. Bush administration, said he supported this one because it created a sense of urgency among Afghans and their neighbors.

The uniformed military, however, never embraced the deadline. Instead, military officers say the Afghan government and neighboring countries assume that the United States will abandon them and are making alliances around the American military, not working alongside it.

Just last week, Army Gen. David Petraeus, the commander of U.S. Central Command, appeared on Capitol Hill and answered questions about whether he supported the July 2011 withdrawal timeline with a “qualified yes.”

In hopes of reassuring its allies in the region, Pentagon officials have suggested that the withdrawal will be gradual and “conditions-based,” and that the U.S. military presence will remain until Afghanistan is stable.

However, Biden also told a reporter that “in July of 2011, you are going to see a whole lot of people moving out. Bet on it."

The war effort continued flailing. U.S. troops deaths rose, and the Taliban's hold in Afghanistan kept expanding as NATO members such as Britain, Germany and Canada sought ways to reduce their presence in the country. McChrystal launched an offensive in the southern city of Marjah in February to eliminate a Taliban stronghold.

Weeks after the operation, the Taliban reappeared in the town. The U.S. military had planned a major offensive this month in the southern city of Kandahar, Afghanistan’s largest city. The military since has tried to lower expectations of that effort, however, saying it will last well into the winter rather than being a burst of activity.

The troop surge was supposed to include a civilian component but remains under-resourced. In addition, the military is short 450 trainers in its effort to build up the Afghan army and police. Throughout, officials haven't spelled out what they envision as Afghanistan’s political end state.

In a White House briefing Tuesday, Deputy Press Secretary Bill Burton said the president remained committed to the July 2011 timetable to start drawing down troops, but he noted that Obama also said he'd review those plans late this year.

"The president is committed to that timeline, and he’s also committed to making sure that we have a full review at the end of this year, as he announced in his West Point speech," Burton said. "And we will go from there."

If Obama accepts McChrystal’s resignation or fires him, it would be the second time under Gates’ tenure that a high-ranking military official has resigned over controversial comments made in a magazine piece. In March 2008, then-CENTCOM commander Adm. William “Fox” Fallon resigned over remarks he made to Esquire magazine criticizing the Bush administration.

Gates replaced him with Petraeus.

(Special correspondent Saeed Shah in Kabul, Afghanistan, and Jonathan S. Landay and Steven Thomma in Washington contributed to this article.)

MORE FROM MCCLATCHY

McChrystal calls Marjah a ‘bleeding ulcer’ in Afghan campaign

McChrystal recalled to Washington over Rolling Stone article

U.S. military criticizes McClatchy story on McChrystal in Marjah

Report finds U.S. tax money may be funding Afghan insurgents

Afghan parliamentary vote will test security conditions

New Afghan commission is setting Taliban suspects free

Experts: U.S. has no long-term political strategy for Afghanistan

McClatchy Washington Bureau is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service