Report finds U.S. tax money may be funding Taliban

June 21, 2010 

WASHINGTON — Private security contractors protecting convoys supplying U.S. military bases in Afghanistan are paying millions of dollars a week in "passage bribes" to the Taliban and other insurgent groups to travel along Afghan roads, a congressional investigation released Monday has found.

The payments, which are reimbursed by the U.S. government, essentially help fund the very enemy the U.S. is attempting to defeat and renew questions about the U.S. dependence on private contractors, who outnumber American troops in Afghanistan, 130,000 to 93,000.

The report's author called the findings of the six-month investigation "sobering and shocking."

"This arrangement has fueled a vast protection racket run by shadowy network of warlords, strongmen, commanders, corrupt Afghan officials, and perhaps others,” Rep. John Tierney, D-Mass., chairman of the subcommittee on National Security and Foreign Affairs wrote. "Not only does the system run afoul of the Department's own rules and regulations mandated by Congress, it also appears to risk undermining the U.S. strategy for achieving its goals in Afghanistan."

Spoekesman from the U.S. Central Command, which oversees operations in Afghanistan, declined to comment. The subcommittee is scheduled to hold a hearing into its investigation Tuesday.

Nearly every company listed in the report is associated with senior Afghan officials, including President Hamid Karzai, the minister of defense, a provincial governor and a senior Afghan Army official.

One of those companies, Host Nation Trucking, transports about 70 percent of all goods to U.S. troops stationed in 200 bases and combat outposts throughout Afghanistan, conducting between 6,000 and 8,000 trucking missions a month. The $2.16 billion contract called on HNT truckers to provide their own security, but did not call for any oversight into how the companies did that.

The investigation found that HNT has contracted with seven other companies to carry the cargo, but only one of those actually owns trucks. The others hire local Afghans, whose trucks sometimes bear the U.S. flag.

The truckers pay as much as $1,500 a truck to get to a base to “nearly every Afghan governor, police chief and local military unit whose territory the company passed,” according to the 79-page report. One company paid $150,000 for protection.

Tierney said he was unable to determine precisely how much was spent on such payments, but said it could reach millions a week.

The report alleges that neither the contactors nor the military know specifically how those trucks arrive safely at bases.

“The Department of Defense has been largely blind to potential strategic consequences of its supply chain contingency contracting. U.S. military logisticians have little visibility into what happens to their trucks on the road and virtually no understanding of how security is actually provided,” the report found.

The report quoted emails, PowerPoint presentations and meeting notes of HNT officials alerting local military commanders to the problem but the report found the military did little in response.

The report interviewed a major who sat in on a May 2009 meeting between the military and an HNT contractor about goods transported in Paktika province. The contractor complained that he was paying $150,000 a month to get supplies to Forward Operating Base Sharana.

Concerns over how U.S. contracting may be fueling Afghanistan’s rampant corruption have existed for years. But only earlier this month did Michele Flournoy, the undersecretary of Defense for Policy, and U.S. Central Command commander Gen. David Petraeus establish a task force to investigate the effects.

(Jonathan S. Landay contributed.)


Afghan parliamentary vote will test security conditions

New Afghan commission is setting Taliban suspects free

Experts: U.S. has no long-term political strategy for Afghanistan

Follow McClatchy on Twitter.

McClatchy Washington Bureau is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service