EPA sets first new limit on sulfur dioxide in decades

McClatchy NewspapersJune 3, 2010 

WASHINGTON — The Environmental Protection Agency on Thursday set a new health standard that coal-fired power plants and other industries will have to meet on sulfur dioxide, a pollutant that triggers asthma attacks and causes other respiratory problems.

The EPA set the new standard within a range that an independent panel of scientists suggested. This marks the first time the standard has been changed since the original one was issued in 1971.

The new rule sets the amount at 75 parts per billion over a one-hour period, a level that's aimed at protecting people who go outdoors from short-term exposures. The EPA said that even brief exposure could create health problems, especially for children, people with asthma and older people.

The agency also changed its rules to require more monitors in areas that have the highest amounts of sulfur dioxide pollution.

Sulfur dioxide comes mainly from coal-fired power plants. The EPA is in the process of tightening controls on other air pollutants from coal and other fossil fuels. It's expected to issue a final rule tightening the regulation of ozone, or smog, in September.

The EPA estimated that cleaner air as a result of the new standard would mean 2,300 to 5,900 fewer premature deaths and 54,000 fewer asthma attacks per year. It said the estimated cost to upgrade pollution controls was about $1.5 billion.

Clean Air Watch, an advocacy group, gave the EPA "a B plus or A minus" on the new standard. It was slightly less strict than the group and the American Lung Association had recommended.

Charles D. Connor, the president of the American Lung Association, said the new standard "will help curtail the bursts of this noxious gas that spew into communities living next to some of our nation's oldest, dirtiest polluters, including coal-fired power plants. This standard offers the promise of real protection to the people who have breathed these fumes for far too long."

Dan Riedinger, a spokesman for the Edison Electric Institute, a power industry group, said: "It's a very stringent standard. It will certainly have an impact on electric utilities in terms of the need for us to continue to install new pollution-control devices on our power plants."

Those controls will be put on power plants that burn coal, which is cheap but also is the most polluting fuel. Natural gas plants produce much less sulfur dioxide. The EPA said that power plants accounted for 73 percent of the sulfur dioxide in the air.

Riedinger said it was too early to say how many plants would need additional equipment. The industry also is expecting a separate revised rule on air pollution that applies specifically to the electric power industry, and it also will require sulfur dioxide reductions.

The Edison Electric Institute had fought the sulfur dioxide health standard the EPA set, arguing that scientific research supported a less stringent one.

Power plants have reduced sulfur dioxide by 70 percent since 1980 under existing regulations.


Top kill's failure means Gulf oil spill will only get worse

Oil spill's scope threatens Gulf's endangered marine life

Obama calls for a price on carbon emissions

Check out McClatchy's politics blog, Planet Washington

McClatchy Newspapers 2010

McClatchy Washington Bureau is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service