For Idaho Democrat Minnick, it's still 'no' to health overhaul

McClatchy NewspapersMarch 16, 2010 

WASHINGTON — They're among the 39 most sought-after people in Washington this week, the Democrats in the House of Representatives who voted against health care last year, but who might be persuaded to change their minds.

But not Rep. Walt Minnick, D-Idaho, who was elected in 2008 in an overwhelmingly Republican district and already has announced he's not voting for the health care bill.

"I have analyzed the bill, I've listened to my constituents, and I have told people, and I'm of the view that it's not a bill I can vote for," he said. "The bill has not change din any substantive way in the last few weeks. And I'm going to vote against it for the same reason I voted against the first one."

So far, Minnick hasn't had much in the way of what he called "direct arm twisting" to persuade him to change his vote. He also hasn't heard from the White House or directly from top House Democrats — although he said Tuesday that could change because "the week is yet young." Some House Democrats have gotten personal phone calls from President Barack Obama or a pledge he will help them with their re-election campaigns.

Right now, Minnick said he's mostly hearing from his constituents in Idaho.

"That is more the pressure that I tend to pay attention to," he said. "I try pretty hard to be more responsive to that than I do to arm-twisting from colleagues or leadership here."

Most of the pressure to toe the party line is coming at caucus meetings, Minnick said, and most of it has focused on the merits of the bill. It's all that any of his colleagues are talking about, whether they're in the member's gym, the hallways of House office buildings, or the floor of the House itself.

He says his biggest concern remains that he doesn't believe enough has been done in the bill to control the cost of health care. He also doesn't think Democrats did all they could to make the legislation palatable to as many people as possible.

"My biggest complaint about all of this from Day One, is it was not a bill that was developed with bipartisan input and therefore didn't develop bipartisan support and didn't represent the thinking of the middle of the political spectrum — which I tend to pay particular attention to," Minnick said.

As for the appeal coming from leadership that there's no better time than now to pass a long-term goal for the Democratic Party, "that's not a persuasive argument for me," Minnick said. "I want to do what's best for Idaho."

McClatchy Washington Bureau is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service