California's low carbon fuel rules are unconstitutional, say oil and trucking groups

The Sacramento BeeFebruary 3, 2010 

The oil and trucking industry sued to block California's new carbon fuel regulations Tuesday, saying the rules will raise costs but do little to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

In a lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in Fresno, lobbyists for oil refiners, truckers and other groups charged that the state's "low carbon fuel standard" is unconstitutional.

While not as well known as AB 32, the state's landmark climate-change legislation, the fuel standard is an important element of California's attempt to fight global warming.

It's a thicket of regulations that says transportation fuels must reduce their "carbon intensity," starting next year. It not only targets the carbon content of a fuel but also examines the amount of carbon emitted to produce the fuel and haul it to its destination.

The California Air Resources Board, which adopted the standard last spring, says it will save billions of dollars by reducing oil consumption and encouraging new biofuels and electric-vehicle technologies. While the new fuels "in the beginning are going to be expensive," eventually costs will come down, said board member Dan Sperling, a professor at the University of California, Davis.

But in their lawsuit, the National Petrochemical & Refiners Association, American Trucking Associations and two other groups say the standard is a costly disaster.

To read the complete article, visit www.sacbee.com.

McClatchy Washington Bureau is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service