• Posted on Friday, January 22, 2010
  • Bookmark and Share
  • email
  • |
  • print
  • |
  • rss

tool name

close
tool goes here

Scott Roeder's trial starts on anniversary of Roe v. Wade

Stay Connected

Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Facebook Follow us on your iPhone
Follow us on your Android device Sign up for email newsletters RSS

More on this Story

On the anniversary of the Supreme Court ruling that gave constitutional protection for abortions, prosecutors this morning will begin presenting evidence that Scott Roeder killed George Tiller because he performed them.

A jury of eight men and six women were seated Thursday afternoon and will begin hearing evidence this morning — 37 years to the day after the high court decided Roe v. Wade in 1973.

Sedgwick County District Judge Warren Wilbert plans to swear in the jury, most of whom are over the age of 40.

Roeder, 51, is charged with the May 31 killing of Tiller, one of the few physicians in the country who performed late-term abortions.

Over the past week, lawyers narrowed the jury pool to 47 in individual questioning of jurors privately, before opening the jury selection to the public briefly on Thursday.

"We talked to you about private issues, things maybe you wouldn't discuss with your own spouse," public defender Mark Rudy told the remaining jurors.

Prosecutor Kim Parker asked jurors whether they had any religious beliefs or philosophies that would prevent them from convicting Roeder of first-degree murder if the evidence warrants it.

"That is probably the most important question we can ask," Parker said.

Row by row, each juror said, "No."

Roeder also stands accused of aggravated assault involving two members of Tiller's church, where the doctor was shot just as Sunday services began.

Parker also asked jurors whether they could decide the case without outside distractions, either from news reports or questions from friends, family or others. The trial is attracting national attention.

"Someone came up to me last night and asked, 'What case are you on?' " one woman answered. "I just told them I was on a criminal case. I just walked away, and that's what I would do."

Parker also asked whether people should be held responsible for their voluntary actions.

To read the complete article, visit www.kansas.com.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

We welcome comments. To post one, you must sign in using either your McClatchyDC login or your login for Facebook, Twitter or Disqus. Just click the appropriate box below.

Please keep your comment civil, short and to the point. Obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. If you find a comment abusive or inappropriate, please flag it for the moderator by placing your cursor on the comment, then clicking the "flag" link that appears. Thanks for your participation.

LEGAL AFFAIRS BLOG

Suits & Sentences

"Suits & Sentences" is written by Mike Doyle, who covers the Supreme Court for McClatchy's Washington Bureau. Send a story suggestion.